virtual aliases vs. dovecot users

Hi, I'm in the process of upgrading our old mailserver (postfix, amavis & dovecot, all LDAP fed). Previously not all users were virtual, a situation that I want to get rid of. So far, all works nicely except for one thing: when amavis bans a locally originating email, it tries to send an email

Re: Am I overdoing my configuration?

On 28 Nov 2015, at 16:16, Michael Grimm wrote: Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:26:20PM -0500, David Mehler wrote: In particular can I eliminate the rbl checks in smtpd_recipient_restrictions since they're going in the postscreen setup? Keep

Re: combined backup and primary MX config

Dave Lewis - Mailinglist: > What I want to do or rather I have a need to do is have one domain on the > backup MX as a primary mx. Does anyone have any sample config's mixing the > two ? or is it even possible ? is it just as simple as using a regular > primary config and including It is as

combined backup and primary MX config

Hi, I wanted to get people's suggestions/opinions about mixing primary and backup MX's. In my old mail config with qmail it seemed easier to configure. Basically I have one mail server with a bunch of domains on it, which acts as the primary mx (incoming and outgoing etc etc), then I

Re: Am I overdoing my configuration?

Noel Jones wrote: > On 11/28/2015 3:16 PM, Michael Grimm wrote: >> Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:26:20PM -0500, David Mehler wrote: In particular can I eliminate the rbl checks in smtpd_recipient_restrictions

[OT] shocking incident in software industry

Dear list, A shocking incident in software industry has been disclosed recently. I'm sharing it here so that more people can support the cause. https://www.change.org/p/andi-puehringer-netzrezepte-de-netzrezepte-technologies-pvt-ltd-clear-pending-salaries-and-compensate-for-our-job-loss

Re: virtual aliases vs. dovecot users

Udo Rader: > Hi, > > I'm in the process of upgrading our old mailserver (postfix, amavis & > dovecot, all LDAP fed). > > Previously not all users were virtual, a situation that I want to get > rid of. > > So far, all works nicely except for one thing: when amavis bans a > locally originating