On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:20, lists wrote:
>
> /\.asia$/ 510 Denied: Unacceptable TLD .asia
[Long list… removed]
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname
check_helo_access pcre:/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre permit
/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre:
/.*\.(com|net|org|edu|gov|ca|mx|de|
Hi Dominic
How can I set gmail not top-posted? Its default reply is at the top.
I have read the article, unfortunately I want to forward all messages not
to create filters against special conditions.
Someone told me can forward to a commercial pobox account then pobox has
the ability to forward
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 06:11:15PM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
> OK, I'm a rank amateur at this. I'll take the CNAME record out.
Note that despite RFC2181 a non-trivial fraction of domains do set
the "exchange" portion of an MX RR to a name that is a CNAME alias.
I am not aware of any MTAs that r
OK, I'm a rank amature at this. I'll take the CNAME record out. My mx
record looks OK with "10 mail.{my-FQDN}". I will create an A record
called mail which will point to my machine's IP address. I have no NS
records at this time.
On 10/23/2019 3:41 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 23 Oct 2019, at 12:33
As an aside, I have stopped some real live human beings from getting these dumb
TLDs. Apparently "design" is one that is becoming popular for obvious but wrong
headed reasons.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.design
Original Message
From: xxdpp...@yahoo.com
Sent: October 23, 2019 1:
I've had the same problem for some time. I put the following into access_helo
and header_checks. It's pretty severe (and the list gets bigger every month)
but the percentage of valid email coming from those domains is next to nil.
I use a 510 rather than a 554 reject so hopefully they won't try
Pedro David Marco:
> Thanks Wietse..
> The? output is this:??
> # date ; env - dateWed Oct 23 21:22:20 CEST 2019Wed Oct 23 21:22:20 CEST 2019#
> It is actual valid localtime...?
> Thanks again,
> Pedro.
Can you run this AS A NON-ROOT USER? On the same machine that runs
Postfix?
The Postfix mailq
* li...@sbt.net.au:
> what's the best way to block that, block entire '*.best' ?
> how and where ?
See http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html . You can
for example use
/\.best$/ REJECT
in a PCRE style sender access file to match envelope sender addresses.
-Ralph
On 23 Oct 2019, at 14:33, Steve Matzura wrote:
[...]
On a whim, I change the DNS record for mail from A to CNAME.
That's a weird and dangerous whim. Hostnames that are used as the value
for MX records MUST have A records and hence MUST NOT have CNAME
records. The CNAME *MIGHT* work if done co
On 23 Oct 2019, at 12:33, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I change the DNS record for mail from A to CNAME
Don’t do that.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2181
The domain name used as the value of a NS resource record, or part of
the value of a MX resource record must not be an alias. Not only is
th
Thanks Wietse..
The output is this:
# date ; env - dateWed Oct 23 21:22:20 CEST 2019Wed Oct 23 21:22:20 CEST 2019#
It is actual valid localtime...
Thanks again,
Pedro.
On Wednesday, October 23, 2019, 3:56:51 PM GMT+2, Wietse Venema
wrote:
Pedro David Marco:
> Hi,
> my Postfix 3.1.12
Things are definitely getting better, but not enough to make eighteen
users happy yet.
The manual granting of privileges in MySQL stopped the virtual alias
errors entirely.
More syslog checking revealed I did not have policyd-spf installed. I
took care of that, but neglected to comment out
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 16:54, Maggie Q Roth wrote:
> Hi I am newbie on technology sorry.
> Do you know how I setup gmail to forward to a group of other emails? From
> their webmail I can setup the only one. Will postfix do this stuff?
> Maggie
>
This is not really a postfix question, you've post
Hi
I am newbie on technology sorry.
Do you know how I setup gmail to forward to a group of other emails? From
their webmail I can setup the only one. Will postfix do this stuff?
Maggie
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 17:24, Dominic Raferd
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 17:05, Wietse Venema
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 17:24, Dominic Raferd
wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 17:05, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > Noel Jones:
> > > On 10/22/2019 10:27 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 16:18, Noel Jones
> wrote:
> > > >> ...
> > > >>> I am using postfix 3.3. Apart from cr
Here's what I want to do:
1. Email is received for an address I have set to forward emails, let's call it
forw...@example.com.
2. Postfix pipes the email through a command postforward, which in turn runs
the email through postsrsd, to make spf and such validate (especially when
forwarding to an
On 10/23/2019 8:27 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
I've narrowed my problems down to three. Two may be related.
1. Virtual alias table lookup failure:
syslog is full of pairs of entries like these:
Oct 23 13:03:06 theglobalvoice postfix/trivial-rewrite[23647]:
warning: virtual_alias_domains:
pro
luc...@dds.nl:
> > So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
>
> That sounds like what I am looking for, thanks!
> How do I do that? I did not get it to work with a REPLACE in the
> header_checks...
header_checks are based on first-match-wins, so you would need
different regexps f
Pedro David Marco:
> Hi,
> my Postfix 3.1.12 mailq command is showing timestamps in UTC... is it
> possible to have them in localtime?
>
> It is not chrooted and /etc/localtime is correct.
What is the output from:
date ; env - date
I'm asking this, because the date conversion happens in the po
I've narrowed my problems down to three. Two may be related.
1. Virtual alias table lookup failure:
syslog is full of pairs of entries like these:
Oct 23 13:03:06 theglobalvoice postfix/trivial-rewrite[23647]: warning:
virtual_alias_domains:
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_map
luc...@dds.nl:
> Hello Group,
>
> I have configured Postfix as a relay to forward all messages to the AWS
> SES mail service.
>
> One sending application is sending mail with a From: header containing a
> semicolon-separated list of addresses. This is not according to the
> standard (https://tool
on 2019/10/23 16:48, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
That sounds like what I am looking for, thanks!
How do I do that? I did not get it to work with a REPLACE in the
header_checks...
I saw postfix has a address rewrite guide you may want to ch
So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
That sounds like what I am looking for, thanks!
How do I do that? I did not get it to work with a REPLACE in the
header_checks...
on 2019/10/23 16:40, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
I was just curious, why the From addr is a list of addresses?
Isn't from just a single address?
My bad - I meant to say the "To:" header!
So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
regards.
I was just curious, why the From addr is a list of addresses?
Isn't from just a single address?
My bad - I meant to say the "To:" header!
Thanks
Hi
on 2019/10/23 16:27, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
One sending application is sending mail with a From: header containing a
semicolon-separated list of addresses. This is not according to the
standard (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.3) and is
rejected by SES:
I was just curious, w
Hello Group,
I have configured Postfix as a relay to forward all messages to the AWS
SES mail service.
One sending application is sending mail with a From: header containing a
semicolon-separated list of addresses. This is not according to the
standard (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 6:19 AM, Wesley Peng wrote:
>
> I saw my ESP has two MX records pointing to just the same host.
>
> rambler.ru. 21 IN MX 5 inmx.rambler.ru.
> rambler.ru. 21 IN MX 10 inmx.rambler.ru.
>
> Does this have any value inprove
28 matches
Mail list logo
