> On August 14, 2020 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> This is of those rare cases where the documentation is now in error. In
> order to improve backwards compatibility with postfix prior to 2.10, the
> order of evaluation was changed in postfix-3.3-20180106 to evaluate the
> recipient restrictions
> On August 21, 2020 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> * if smtpd_relay_restrictions has been set (not defaulted) evaluate it
>> first
> I mentioned this to Wietse recently. My instinct is to go with the
> last option.
Viktor, great! Thank you for the update..
Greg
Hi,
First thank you for all the work you do/have done on Postfix!
I have been using Postfix for 15+ years to handle mail for a handful
of my domains. I upgraded my mail server from Debian 8 to 10 a couple
months ago, and was running 3.4.10-0+deb10u1 as of the time I last saw
the issue below.
>>>>> On August 14, 2020 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 05:41:38PM -0400, Greg Klanderman wrote:
>> smtpd_relay_restrictions is documented as being checked before
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
> This is of those rare cases where
> On April 10, 2022 Bill Cole
> wrote:
> Right, because you do not need to run 'postmap' on regex or pcre maps. The
> text
> format ios what Postfix uses for those types.
Thank you Bill! Knowing that now, I see where postmap(1) states:
| The postmap(1) command can query any
Hi all,
Quick question, what is the correct syntax to match an empty sender in
a hash: sender access map (i.e. check_sender_access)?
Somewhat related, if I have a regexp: map (header checks), like so:
/^Subject:.*foo bar/ REJECT
/^Subject:.*foo baz/ REJECT
when it is postmap'd, it warns
egexp
> package installed?" instead of "unsupported map type for this
> operation". This happened with all non-dynamic map types (static,
> cidr, etc.) that have no 'bulk create' support. Problem reported
> by Greg Klanderman.
Thank you Wietse!
Greg
>>>>> On April 10, 2022 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 02:27:33PM -0400, Greg Klanderman wrote:
>> Quick question, what is the correct syntax to match an empty sender in
>> a hash: sender access map (i.e. check_sender_access)?
> This is
>>>>> On April 13, 2022 Matus UHLAR <- fantomas > wrote:
>>>>>>> On April 10, 2022 Bill Cole
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> Right, because you do not need to run 'postmap' on regex or pcre maps. The
>>> text
>>>
