rrect or are I wrong?
Current situation:
- it gives a 450 error code (while it receives a 550 error code)
I think it should be:
- it should give a 550 error code (because it did receive a 550 error code
from a server downstream)
With kind regards,
Mark Scholten
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:17 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Response codes
>
> Mark Scholten:
> > Hello,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of mouss
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 11:51 PM
> To: postfix users
> Subject: Re: Php hook for all my emails
>
> Andrés Gattinoni a écrit :
> > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:29 P
lo/sending server/action (including error
code/error information if available)
I did check and didn't find it here (or I didn't look good enough)
http://www.postfix.org/addon.html#logfile
Is something like that available for postfix or should I create something
for it?
With kind regards,
Mark Scholten
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman
> Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 3:16 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Log file checking
>
> On 07/31/2010 02:15
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner
> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 12:26 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Log file checking
>
> Mark Scholten put for
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner
> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 3:50 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Log file checking
>
> Mark Scholten put fo
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 11:15 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix on Cloud
>
> Julio Cesar Covolato put forth on 8/7/2010 12
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Walter Pinto
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 1:20 AM
> To: postfix users
> Subject: Re: How to reject bad hosts
>
> I also can vouch for policyd-weight , with a bit of c
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:12 PM
> To: postfix users
> Subject: Re: Postfix MX Real-Time Anit-SPAM Firewall
>
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Au
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of pf at alt-ctrl-del.org
> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 12:31 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: conditional "recipient address verification" - how to do?
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Dom Latter
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 11:41 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Logfile condenser
>
> Helo, as one might say.
>
> Wading through logfile
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of mouss
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:55 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Logfile condenser
>
> what I'd like to see is "requirements/needs". that is:
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner
> Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 6:14 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: postfix clustering
>
> Reinaldo de Carvalho put forth on 10/30/2010
"unknown" client hostname)
- Helo matches client hostname
Using extra smtpd_restriction_classes isn't a problem (as I do it already
for certain "whitelists").
With kind regards,
Mark Scholten
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Reinaldo de Carvalho
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 3:28 PM
> To: Mark Scholten
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Custom action b
an online form.
Also note:
- Donations/money won't be accepted.
- On some pages regarding this free service I might put ads (the files with
the information won't contain any ads that could cause problems with
postfix).
I also want to publish a list with known not working rDNS hosts with mail
servers to lower the number of F/P while blocking on not matching rDNS.
With kind regards,
Mark Scholten
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:41 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: postscreen request: pcre support
>
> Jeroen Koekkoek:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I woul
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:08 AM
> To: Robert Schetterer; postfix users list
> Subject: RE: OT aol.com no mx record ???
>
>
there. I didn't find it in
the documentation (but I might have overlooked something).
With kind regards,
Mark Scholten
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 8:00 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Change error messages returned by Postfix
>
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011
Wietse Venema:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Instead of making every response configurable, a more practical
> > solution is to configure ONE response that gets appended to ALL
> > the SMTP server's reject messages. Effectively, this turns the
> > one-line reject into a two-line response, one chosen by Pos
>
> Le 04/01/2011 22:24, Noel Jones a écrit :
> > On 1/4/2011 3:04 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to stop the chain of:
> >> Sender calls recipient, recipient calls their tech,
> >> recipient's tech calls me... Then I tell them to contact the
> >> sender's admin... Then the
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Subject: Re: Change error messages returned by Postfix
>
> This is the current implementation of "reject" footer messages.
>
> Wietse
>
> smtpd_reject_contact_information (defau
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:52 AM
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:02:00PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > I've been running with "smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade = strong" with
> Postfix
>
Hello,
The feature with the config name smtpd_reject_footer is now available for
some time. Our experience with it is that some people really read it and do
what is listed in the message provided.
How is your experience with it?
Wietse: Thank you for adding this feature!
Kind regards,
Mark
Hello,
We have Postfix running for some years now. And for what we did with it it
is great. However I'm looking for an extra option as we didn't use it for
this (for this part we currently use Exim, I want to change it to Postfix).
Situation:
- Postfix 2.9.6 installed using apt-get on Debian 7 (i
Hello,
We have a few forwarders where we need to change the "mail from" during the
SMTP stage. Nothing else has to change and I know that spam would be seen as
coming from our mail server if we forward it. This last part is acceptable
for us. On the mail server that we want to retire this is done
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Kozlowski [mailto:m.kozlow...@mini.pw.edu.pl]
> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 8:04
> To: Mark Scholten; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Changing "mail from"
>
> :-)
>
> On 06/04/2017 07:58 AM, Mark Scholte
29 matches
Mail list logo
