The docs at http://www.postfix.org mention several features available in
postfix 2.6(experimental).
Where is the complete changelog of postfix 2.6 available
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 04:05 -0800, Harakiri wrote:
Hi,
i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over
postfix servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
check? Maybe a
One of my clients sends mail using a custom application which *cannot*
recognize a smtpd error message .. like user-not-found, or
invalid-domain etc
Now they want our postfix server to accept all mails without checks and
send NDR's for undeliverable mails.
Can I write a special transport in
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 09:05 +0200, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
on my smtp out i want to put ''reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org''
since many local ADSL dynamic ips are in PBL ; is it desirable?
where i can put this? this relay machine does only sending out;
help appreciated
For outgoing
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:40 -0700, tom lee wrote:
hello,
I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
clear about two issues.
I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B is a relay
server forwarding the email to machine C (target machine).
I want to
I use cyrus saslauthd with -r option to include realms in login.
For smtp-auth configuration, some users put full emailid as username ,
some use just the userid part of email-id(before '@'). Can postfix
always authenticate with userid. Can this be done only for email-ids of
some domain
For
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:03 +1100, ctheod...@shakenbake.net wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We have a Email Archive system which is designed for a Email Journaling (from
Exchange). Is there a feature (perhaps a milter), within Postfix that can
achieve the same feature?
note: using postfix-2.5.6 on
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:51 +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Hello,
I was looking for a way to do selective milter. Meaning if a specific
host connects I send it trough the milter.
I would suggest you try implement the logic in the milter itself
That would be very trivial to do , even if
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering perfectly fine
There are no body / header checks on this machine that could
potentially be slowing down pickup. And
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 14:23 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:01:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 03:22 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:16:51AM +0530, ram wrote:
The pickup process is not responsible for moving mail out of the
incoming queue. If mail is stuck in maildrop, then debug pickup.
http://www.postfix.org
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* ram r...@netcore.co.in:
Thanks for all the info. Well the high incoming queue is definitely is
due to syslog. Because I also notice that some of my logs are also
getting dropped.
Sorry for being OT , but can someone help
...@netcore.co.in /etc/hosts
I need to identify the bottle neck. Do I need better CPU , or better
harddisks. There seems to be plenty of RAM free though
We provide relay services for our clients.
The clients mail-servers connect to our postfix servers , authenticate
using a client-accountid and send the messages.
I would like to restrict the from domains for every client.(Mainly to
prevent inadvertent spam outbreaks)
Can I use smtplogin maps
Can I implement smtp_sender_login_maps such a way that
* for selective accountids reject_sender_login_mismatch
* And the for the rest Permit any sender id if authenticated
SNIP
Note When I send mail from this very server the mails are forwarded
according to the virtual_alias_maps.
but when I do the same from another server the second server mail.info
shows that the message is sent successfully. But the first server
where my postfix is running with vitual_alias
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 19:10 +0200, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys. I've been googling around looking for info on this without much
sucess. Here we are: Some of my customers insist on sending bulk-email
from their web php sites (you know,
If I enable cisco pix workarounds on a high traffic outgoing server ,
what are the performance impacts on that
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 09:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
If I enable cisco pix workarounds on a high traffic outgoing server ,
what are the performance impacts on that
It has no impact for delivery to non-PIX systems.
For all outgoing mails, the mails are going through a PIX
??
Thanks
Ram
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
limit
Thanks
Ram
I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept mails and
relay to an admin email-id , is that possible.
Or should I simply accept all mails and move spamhaus checks to
SpamAssassin and write rules over
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 06:26 -0400, Sean C. wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible in postfix to set an account to never generate bounce
back messages or to send them all to a email account rather than to the
originating user? I have an account where users email in and it maps
via aliases to
Error: authentication failed: authentication failure
MAIL FROM:r...@netcore.co.in
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO:postmas...@mumbai.nstest.com
250 2.1.5 Ok
DATA
354 End data with CRLF.CRLF
.
250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 32E07147D31
QUIT
221 2.0.0 Bye
==
How do I prevent this ???
Thanks
Ram
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:25 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:06:09PM +0530, ram wrote:
RCPT TO:postmas...@mumbai.nstest.com
250 2.1.5 Ok
Mail to $address_verify_sender (qualified with @$myorigin if a bare
user name) is not subject to recipient restrictions
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 09:27 +, Arora, Sumit wrote:
Hi All,
I’m new to postfix, I need to execute my code when I receive a new
email on my postfix smtp server.
Please give me some idea, where I can get the postfix code
documentation so that I can change its code.
All and
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 00:58 -0300, Postfix User wrote:
I'm having an issue getting the smtp client to bind to an aliased IP
address.
mail_version = 2.5.7
I've tried to no avail to have the smtp client use a aliased IP to
deliver mail but it insists on using the address of the interface
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 07:57 -0300, Postfix User wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:28 +0530, ram wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 00:58 -0300, Postfix User wrote:
I'm having an issue getting the smtp client to bind to an aliased IP
address.
mail_version = 2.5.7
I've tried
smtpd_helo_required = no
Thanks
Ram
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is the right thing , but
we for now I
We use postfix to accept mails at our MX servers and relay it to
scanning servers for spam virus checking
The problem is last week , I had the smtp service on MX servers hanging
while trying to relay some messages. Both sending and receiving servers
run postfix 2.5.1
Oct 24
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 08:49 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
delay=180, delays=0.11/0/0.1/180, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
(conversation with 202.162.240.2[202.162.240.2] timed out while sending
message body)
You have set your SMTP client timeouts TOO LOW.
A timeout of 180s for DATA
We need to design a mail system where postfix transport maps file will
grow based on the inputs. . This may grow to a million lines
I need to know what will be the max entries in transport map that the
machine can handle ( 4 GB Ram , Quad Xeon) .. given that the system is
running postfix
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:46 +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von ram r...@netcore.co.in:
We need to design a mail system where postfix transport maps file will
grow based on the inputs. . This may grow to a million lines
I need to know what will be the max entries in transport
to remove the reject_unknown_client because of this.
I hope postfix would have a *reject_no_ptr* .. that just checks for PTR
record exists.
Thanks
Ram
better.
Thanks
Ram
PS:
The parser may not be so neat because postfix unfortunately does not log
in sender , recipient , sent and size on a single line
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 20:55 -0800, cont...@rusanu.com wrote:
Is there a way to configure postfix to use a relay only if direct
delivery is rejected? The case being a web application that has to
send notification to subscribers, but some servers reject the
connection (app IP originates
At one of our locations I need to throttle outgoing , due to bandwidth
constraints
Can I specify maximum number of outgoing messages sent via smtp in a
minute or hour
Something similar to smtpd_client_message_rate_limit .
Thanks
Ram
+0530, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote:
Hi Mr Ram,
Here is the solution...
http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html
Look at the example with _destination_rate_delay
Rgds
Dhiraj
Stephen Leacock - I detest life-insurance agents: they always argue
that I shall some day die, which
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 15:51 +0530, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote:
In your main.cf, set default_destination_rate_delay = 1s and
leave all those other parameters at their default.
This will instruct postfix to send no more than 60 messages
per minute.
This will apply to all
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 21:55 -0500, Israel Garcia wrote:
Hi
I'm really sorry if it's OT but I'm having problems verifying my setup
of postfix/dkim/domainkeys. I've found some dkim/domainkeys online
checkers, one told me dkim/domainkeys valid others checkers not. When
sending the same test
warning ?
Should I set a different reply to address ?
Thanks
Ram
smtp_helo_name=client2.netcore.co.in
--
But FILTER smtp1: is apparently no a valid format
Is there a way out
Thanks
Ram
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:38 +0300, Luis Conrado Andrade wrote:
Hi Ralf,
But my server use an DNS server where the MX for domain.com points to them.
In the relay_domain, I have domain.com and to send this message I have to use
the transport file. How can I set internal MX servers and set
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:43 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
I need a sender dependent smtp service for my shared postfix servers
This is similar to what was discussed in the thread a month ago
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg18419.html
This is because
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 09:33 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:43 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
I need a sender dependent smtp service for my shared postfix servers
This is similar to what was discussed in the thread a month ago
http://www.mail
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 20:37 +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
Hello list,
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
R.
Do these 3000
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:53 +0700, Tanuwijaya wrote:
Dear All,
I just installed postfix and now I have several questions about it:
1. How to make it accessible from outside but not making it as an open
relay?
2. Related to question #1, if possible I want to make it serve as main
MX,
restrict_from=
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/permit_domains,
reject
---
Ofcourse one client machine can send mail as any of the allowed
domains .. but thats OK in a practical situation.
Thanks
Ram
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:34 +0530, J. Bakshi wrote:
Dear list,
I am trying to drop outgoing emails having particular email-id in its
[TO] field. Say myn...@domain1.com and myna...@domain2.com, hence any
mail destined for myn...@domain1.com or myna...@domain2.com will be
dropped . To
I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
IP's
But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
Doesnt help if I use MX records instead of A records
How do I do fair loadbalancing with postfix
Thanks
Ram
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 08:59 +0100, Bjørn Ruberg wrote:
ram wrote:
I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
IP's
But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
Are Windows DNS resolvers involved? If so, see for instance this article
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 06:00 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
IP's
But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
Doesnt help if I use MX records instead of A records
How do I do fair
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 14:43 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* ram [25/01/2010 14:41] :
All mails are sent by a postfix server and this box has to relay the
mails to 3 load balanced machines.
No windows machines in the picture at all
What is the DNS server? On what OS is it running
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 11:45 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Serge Fonville serge.fonvi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I noticed with a couple of mail servers that the smtp greeting
contains 220 followed by a lot of asterisks.
CISCO PIX.
When I do a check using mxtoolbox I get Warning -
have managed to add custom logs in postfix source in bounce.c and
sent.c. (Thanks to the neatly structured code it wasnt much of an
effort)
Only problem is when a message expires there is no log line that says
$queue-id: $sender to $rcpt status=expired
How can I log this ?
Thanks
Ram
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:30 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:43:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
One of our clients sends contract notes to their customers and they
require to store all logs of deliveries/bounces by some law.
They have requirements like
* The log
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 07:13 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:30 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:43:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
One of our clients sends contract notes to their customers and they
require to store all logs
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
CentOS x64 server. I
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:48 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/2/22 ram r...@netcore.co.in:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
I need to reject messages above n recipients with a Permanent Failure.
If I configure smtpd_recipient_limit=50
I cant outright reject the messages unless I set
smtpd_hard_error_limit=1
Thanks
Ram
a better a solution let me know too.
Thanks
Ram
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:40 +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
Hi,
we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute
force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound
spam.
The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform outbound spam
) {
if(suspect client login) {
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch
} else {
allow sender_login_mismatch
}
}
Thanks
Ram
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 09:03 +0530, an...@isac.gov.in wrote:
Dear List,
We are using the smtpd-policyd feature from long time to allow some
specific users to receive higher size mails. It is working fine.
But, it does not work when the recipient_count is more than one as we
are
it
Thanks
Ram
servers.
I want to make sure that every customer uses only his domain(s) and
sends the mail. Important to implement proper usage reporting as well as
stop abuse of network
Thanks
Ram
PS: SPF is used by gmail,hotmail, aol and 40% of the fortune 500
companies in the world among a huge lot
postfix has defer deferred queue directories
In what directory are the mails stored when they get deferred due to a
unknown mail transport error
I want to keep monitoring mymail server for such mails
Thanks
Ram
I use in my main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_sender_access regexp:/etc/postfix/sender_transport
and in sender_transport I use FILTER to redirect mails as required
If a mail is coming in via uucp then this will not work. Can something
be done to get it working
Thanks
Ram
not work in header_checks
What could be the reason ?
Thanks
Ram
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:30 +0200, Hement Gopal wrote:
Hi all
I’m running 2.0.13 on my mail gateway.
I accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also have a domain that I still receive mail for called
@abc.mydomain.com
This domain received a huge amount of junkmail
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 08:08 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
I have implemented a custom whitelist/blacklist with a milter. This
milter has been working smoothly for a nearly 2 years now on multiple
machines
But now On 1 machine even if the load is very low and there is ample
free
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
My milter is quiet simple. It just does a bsearch on a in-memory array ,
to find if the recipient has blacklisted / whitelisted the sender and
takes action accordingly
The array now has approx 200k elements, which should
I would like to hide the recipient (alias) address in the header of the
mail. Unfortunately the header on the mail contains received from
for ... alias-id
How can I configure postfix not to insert this header
Thanks
Ram
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 16:48 +0200, mouss wrote:
ram wrote:
I would like to hide the recipient (alias) address in the header of the
mail. Unfortunately the header on the mail contains received from
for ... alias-id
why?
Because our client does not want his end users to see
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:50 -0700, scott andreas wrote:
Hello users,
I'm having transport error issues with a new setup
Ubuntu 6.10
Postfix 2.3
I have a GMAIL APPS hosted mail domain tildaworks.com
Oct 15 10:23:20 lexi postfix/qmgr[16975]: 44A8736E1:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
excellent ) whenever you have power and bandwidth
Route the outgoing mails too the same way
This is the same idea used by many places over here too. Power many not
be the issue, but reliable bandwidth is still a real challenge in rural
places
Thanks
Ram
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
configure postfix to send using different bind addresses
I know I can change the
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 23:39 +1100, Barney Desmond wrote:
ram wrote:
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 09:21 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
configure
. How do I change this
to a 4xx error code so that the clients server would retry the mail
Thanks
Ram
I use postfix 2.3 to accept mails and deliver to a cyrus server via
lmtp (unix )
IF I have a large mailq to local delivery via lmtp , how can I
prioritize the delivery of a particular mail
-listname...@mydomain.com/bounces-mail...@mydomain.com
What do you guys do for handling bounces ?
Thanks
Ram
Sometimes my mailq gets cluttered with lot of undelivearble mails.
Because end servers are not accepting
I wish to bounce back some messages ( not delete them ) from queue
How do I do it ?
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 13:48 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 08:33:12PM +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
My logfiles are approx 1.5 GB each, if we rotate twice a day
grep sender.*recipient $logfile is really much much faster than grep
-i sender.*recipient $logfile
IMHO
uppercase recipient
ids in virtual_alias_maps
Thanks
Ram
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 06:48 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
if I use
virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
Please show evidence of this in the form of SMTP commands and
Postfix logging.
Wietse
I did a default
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
[r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
r...@netcore.co.in
[r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
[r
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:25 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
[r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in
cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
r...@netcore.co.in
[r
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:25 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
[r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in
cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
r...@netcore.co.in
going to
relay to multiple servers and each one will have their own certificates
Thanks
Ram
configure postfix on the MX server to send mails for
ab...@domain.com in a seperate transaction and other recipients in a
seperate transaction
I dont want to break all the multi-recipient mails into multiple, only
for those mails marked to ab...@...
Thanks
Ram
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 10:35 +0200, bharathan kailath wrote:
hi
in smtp out server i configured the following:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/mydomains
reject_unauth_destination
This is what I do
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 22:56 -0800, secSwami wrote:
Hi,
After trying for another day to get my postfix config to work for
virtual domains, I would really appreciate if someone can give me an
example of WORKING main.cf file.
The problem I am having is whenever a MOBILE user is trying to
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:19 +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Hello
does anyone know a (working) URL to submit open-relay so they get
included in RBLs to save others from spam??
Regards
Andreas
report the spam to spamcop.net, that requires to create an account with
them
I have a postfix 2.5 server with two transport files , one hash map and
another regex
I want the hash map to take preference over the regex which doesnt seem
to be happenning
[r...@50.133 postfix]# postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:56 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
ram wrote:
I have a postfix 2.5 server with two transport files , one hash map and
another regex
I want the hash map to take preference over the regex which doesnt seem
to be happenning
[r...@50.133 postfix
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 18:36 +0100, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
Hei,
I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
450
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 11:04 +0100, Richard Foley wrote:
Hi postfix profis,
I'm running postfix 2.1.5-9 for several domains. Of course it handles the
workload with ease, but when I tail the mail.log the screen scrolls
constantly as it's just rejecting spam every second. The good thing is
_ONLY_ the
FROM is warni...@domain.com?
Thanks in advance.
Do not try to modify any setting in postfix. Set your mass
( massive ?? ) mail application Envelope sender-id to a different
sender-id. All mail servers would send the bounce messages to the
Envelope sender id
Thanks
Ram
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
