I'm sorry, but this thread seems to have taken a detour. Being a Dane,
I run into these kinds of responses all the time, simply because I find
it counter-productive to sugarcoat things when writing English.
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 14:41:51 +0200
li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:15:34 -0500 (EST)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Postfix has supported forward secrecy for TLS since version 2.2
when the TLS patch was adopted into Postfix. Things have changed a
lot since then, both in TLS and in the real world.
Viktor wrote up a
Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:53:08 -0400 skrev Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com:
Once you install the Intro app
Well, if the app is not installed, it might solve the problem. Other
than that, I think this is a bit off-topic for Postfix, since it only
applys to Apples hand-held devices.
Cheers,
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:56:53 -0700 skrev Rob Tanner rtan...@linfield.edu:
I've googled around a quite a bit and while I can find lots of
instruction on what I need in order for Postfix to validate incoming
mail, I find nothing about what I need to do to make sure Postfix
does whatever it needs
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:22:00 -0500 skrev postfix2...@hushmail.com:
Holy cow? Two things I didn't expect. Somebody would own a goofy name
like that and somebody else would actually feel like pulling the
records to test that. I suppose example.com is taken too, which is
precisely why I avoided
Thank you for the replys, they are very helpful.
I own this domain, and the danish handler of .dk allows all settings
in DNS to be altered, but the hosting provider does not. All records
besides PTR is within my control at the provider, so I guess it's a
design decision they have taken, and I
Hello
I've searched several times about information on the PTR record, and
what myhostname in main.cf should be. The problem is not the
information, but the fact that I struggle to understand it...
This server runs with the IP address 46.21.105.38 from a hosted VPS, and
using dig to do a reverse
Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:38:38 -0700 skrev Grant emailgr...@gmail.com:
I think I need to tell munin where my postfix logs are
(/var/log/mail/current) since I use metalog. How can I do that?
- Grant
Try'n read some documentation
http://munin.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
Then check out
Fri, 31 May 2013 16:56:11 -0400 (EDT) skrev wie...@porcupine.org
(Wietse Venema):
After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it
is time to change the release numbering scheme.
...
Wietse
I think it would be ill advised to do so, since the current scheme
conforms
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:58:36 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
I wrote a little something about how to prevent delivery to mailboxes
over quota while still being in the SMTP dialogue:
http://sys4.de/en/blog/2013/04/08/postfix-dovecot-mailbox-quota/
(Postfix/Dovecot)
Very useful,
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:27:26 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
* Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk:
Very useful, thank you for writing and sharing. May I suggest the
english Wiki-article for background on backscatter?
URL?
Sorry, off course
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Solved it :-)
When sending to unknown users, Postfix now rejects the mail with User
unknown in virtual mailbox table, and it does so for hosted (that is,
virtual mailbox domains) domains as well.
It seems the SRS-daemon* I have been using with the main.cf parameters
recipient_canonical_maps
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:09:04 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Titanus Eramius:
MAIL FROM:
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO:real-u...@cogky.dk
250 2.1.5 Ok
RCPT TO:non-exist...@cogky.dk
250 2.1.5 Ok
If non-exist...@cogky.dk is substituted with non-exist...@aptget.dk
Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:49:39 -0400 skrev Brian Evans
grkni...@scent-team.com:
Thank you for the link, it was very informative, but didn't solve
the problem. I also tried making a virtual_mailbox_maps MySQL query
that always returned false, but Postfix still accepted all mail,
and then
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:12:40 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Test your lookups:
postmap -q cogky.dk the-virtual_mailbox_domains-table
This should return a result (the value does not matter).
aptget:~# postalias -q cogky.dk
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:30:41 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Titanus Eramius:
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:12:40 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Test your lookups:
postmap -q cogky.dk the-virtual_mailbox_domains-table
This should return
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:05 + skrev Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:21:35PM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
I've tried with relay_domains, but it matches on domain-level which
is too much. I then applied relay_recipient_maps, but it don't seem
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:55:21 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Titanus Eramius:
Besides aptget.dk this server also hosts cogky.dk (among others),
and while unknown recipients is being correctly rejected with a 550
when sent to aptget.dk, they are not when sent to the other
I have set Postfix only to allow relaying through submission on port
587, and as extra safety, I have installed the PolicyD* service to run
some rate limiting, and is trying to configure it with Postfix.
Since the PolicyD service only needs to check mail that gets relayed, I
am trying to call it
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:25:24 -0400 skrev Brian Evans
grkni...@scent-team.com:
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
...
-o ... ,check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031,reject
Change this to
-o ... ,check_policy_service,inet:127.0.0.1:10031,reject
You
Thinking about this, I might have been to specific in my question.
At the fundamental level I would like to have 2 or more Postfix servers
capable of receiving virtual mail for multiple domains, where one of
the servers also handles relaying and local delivery. The rest should
function as backup
Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:25:31 -0600 skrev Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
...
Nothing wrong with this setup. It's very easy to configure,
requires no third-party software or additional packages, and it's
easy to understand where your mail goes. I expect that's why it's
used as an example
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:39:24 +0100 skrev DTNX Postmaster
postmas...@dtnx.net:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 12:18, Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk wrote:
I plan on upgrading Debians stable Postfix to the current stable
version of 2.10 so I may benefit from postscreen, and that will
probably
Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:54:02 +0100 skrev Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
On 02/08/2013 06:02 PM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Feb 7 22:12:48 ntdata postfix/pickup[24843]: 048341743609: uid=5005
from=SRS0=3u76=L7=gmail.com=jimmiedcu...@nt-data.dk
So you are...not re-injecting spamassassin
Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:03:32 -0600 skrev Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 2/7/2013 8:58 AM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin as a content_filter on incoming mail which
ads 4 spam-headers, one of them being X-Spam-Level:. The precise
header varies, depending
Hi all
Please note that the last time I asked about the behavior of Postfix it
turned out I had misunderstood the concept of relaying mail. It might
be the case again.
I'm running the mailserver that serves this domain + a few others,
the mailserver at ubuntudanmark.dk and the mailservers at
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:45:07 -0600 skrev /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk:
snip
---
titanus@ntdata:/var/log$ grep 048341743609 mail.log.1
Feb 7 22:12:48 ntdata postfix/pickup[24843]: 048341743609: uid=5005
from=SRS0=3u76=L7=gmail.com=jimmiedcu...@nt-data.dk
pickup(8) picks up mail which was
I'm running SpamAssassin as a content_filter on incoming mail which ads
4 spam-headers, one of them being X-Spam-Level:. The precise
header varies, depending on the spamscore. SpamAssassin ads one * for
each spampoint, so a example-header could be:
X-Spam-Level:
I would like
Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:30:05 + skrev James Griffin
jmz.grif...@kode5.net:
* Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com [2013-01-29 10:18:15 +0200]:
Hi all
How can I slow down deliveries to specified domain after temporary
deferred?
I have a list for marketing purposes and 2/3 part of
Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:24:11 -0600 skrev Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 1/8/2013 4:11 PM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
I've had some trouble seeing the difference
between -o overrides in main.cf and master.cf, but this really
helps.
main.cf parameters are used by all postfix
Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:59:31 +0100 skrev mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net:
This raises the question (or at least I think it do), if it's
possible to force the users onto 587 by denying relay access to
25?
fix the problem at the source: force the client to do the work:
use different services
I'm a little unsure about best practice here, hence the question.
Running /usr/sbin/spamd from the SpamAssassin package to scan mail, I've
integrated it into /etc/postfix/master.cf with the following
lines
---
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:39:58 -0600 skrev Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 1/8/2013 10:47 AM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
I'm a little unsure about best practice here, hence the question.
Running /usr/sbin/spamd from the SpamAssassin package to scan mail,
I've integrated it into /etc
Tue, 8 Jan 2013 20:29:30 +0100 skrev DTNX Postmaster
postmas...@dtnx.net:
...
The more typical way to do this is for local mail to use the
submission port 587. Sometimes folks redirect port 25 on the local
network to 587 as a migration aid.
This. Using the submission port is highly
Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:06:26 +0100 skrev Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 08.01.2013 21:48, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
This raises the question (or at least I think it do), if it's
possible to force the users onto 587 by denying relay access to
25?
it's more a human problem than
Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:54:41 -0600 skrev Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
...
This raises the question (or at least I think it do), if it's
possible to force the users onto 587 by denying relay access to
25?
It's certainly possible to prevent relaying via port 25, and many
sites do
Hi list
I would like to express my gratitude to all the people on this list,
whom helps new folks like me to run a mailserver.
Especially Wietse would I like to thank, for making Postfix possible. I
can't really imagine using anything else.
So thank you all and happy holidays.
Cheers, Titanus
Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:00:34 -0500 skrev Robert Moskowitz
r...@htt-consult.com:
On 12/27/2012 01:38 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
i want a web interface for our email access.
To me roundcube seems more attractive/better then squirrel-mail
(look wise) however i dont want to overlook better
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:18:38 -0500
ashleygriffin.ca - Contact cont...@ashleygriffin.ca wrote:
Hi
Just so I understand this, what this really means is after version
v2.03, and I have version v2.10?
Some more general reading on the subject could include Wikipedia
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:37:12 +0100
mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
humour
mew :) you like cats too? or is it the pipe that you like?
$ sudo grep /var/log/mail.log
saves a few keystorkes
For some odd reason I kindda do. Maybe it's the concept of a data-pipe
itself, but I
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 20:32:17 -0600
/dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:23:21AM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
My highest concern is to setup an open relay by accident, so
in the process I've used an online anti-spam tester several
times: http://www.antispam
I'm not entirely sure how to formulate this question best in English,
so please bear over with me.
In the past 6 months I've set up several Postfix 2.7.1 servers, which
uses Dovecot as LDA and as SASL auth. One of them runs this domain, but
they are still in testing.
My highest concern is to
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:47:35 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Titanus Eramius:
Running Postfix 2.7.x I have set delay_warning_time to 4 hours, but
was wondering if it is possible to send out two or more bounce
messages about a delayed message?
If you want to know
Running Postfix 2.7.x I have set delay_warning_time to 4 hours, but
was wondering if it is possible to send out two or more bounce messages
about a delayed message?
What I am aiming for is, that if a message can not be delivered to the
destination, then Postfix will inform the sender immediately,
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:50:37 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
forgot to mention you should use BOTH types
TXT and SPF
I did not even know that a SPF record type existed in DNS. At the
homepage of SPF and other places I have read, it is indicated that SPF
= TXT RR in DNS, but
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:17:49 +0200
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 05.10.2012 16:04, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk:
Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as
such.
I
Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
if so, to what extend?
My former provider of mail added a header with the SPF-info retrived
from DNS, and I'm considering to do the same with
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:15:09 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Instead it looks like this:
Det her mailsystemet p?? v??rten mydomain.
Bounce templates have supported non-ASCII from the start. I suspect
that something after Postfix is stripping them.
I just
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:24:37 +
Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
postconf -b just stuffs the raw bits down your terminal, so this
just means that your terminal charset matches the encoding of Danish
characters in the file. What is your $LANG environment variable
set to?
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:13:15 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 28.09.2012 11:11, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
I have tried to set the charset of bounce.cf to UTF-8 and then sent
a few mails to the server to test it. When a bounce returns we'll
know if UTF-8 did the trick
I have translated bounce_template_file to Danish, and besides the
localized letters, it works fine (the English part is still present
in the error).
In /etc/postfix/main.cf I have set
delay_warning_time = 4
bounce_template_file = /etc/postfix/bounce.cf
When I run postconf -b
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 01:50:42 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Like this
http://www.iheavy.com/2012/04/26/bulletproofing-mysql-replications-with-checksums/
* mixed transactional and non-transactional tables
not relevant in this context
why would someone mix
Hello good folks
I have recently brought my very first mailserver online, and have been
testing it for the past month or so. Since the setup needs to be
redundant, I have also brought a secondary mailserver online on it's own
domain, and everything seems to run smoothly.
It's a Debian, Postfix,
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:39:08 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.09.2012 23:56, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
MySQL Replication, which seems a bit dodgy, with the risk of silent
data corruption.
where do you see a risk of silent data corruption?
if htis would
54 matches
Mail list logo
