Le lundi 3 octobre 2011 19:09, Steve Jenkins a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
it takes 5 minutes to clean the SPEC-File and remove
these patches - really i do not understand your problem
It takes 5 minutes for YOU to clean the SPEC
hello postfix list
I just updated to version postfix 2.8.5 with
the source rpm package
http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/postfix/RPMS/ils-5/SRPMS/
I made some changes to the file. spec
Is this correct. this does not compromise my security of my system
my file .spec
Le lundi 3 octobre 2011 01:05, vous avez écrit :
Have you used sasl auth with packages built from this rpm? I've had a heck
of a time trying to build with the pertinent features enabled on centos 5.
Joe
sasl authentication for sending mail works, but the package that manages the
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2011 00:12, mouss a écrit :
Le 15/09/2011 03:34, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
hello list
hello guru of postfix
I think I have correctly configure bind for IPv6. but I still can not
connect with telnet on my server
all testimonials are welcome
well
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2011 09:51, Robert Felber a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:34:58AM +0200, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hello list
hello guru of postfix
I think I have correctly configure bind for IPv6. but I still can not
connect with telnet on my server
all testimonials
hello list
hello guru of postfix
I think I have correctly configure bind for IPv6. but I still can not connect
with telnet on my server
all testimonials are welcome
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
hi folks
I just find out about slow and the table
/etc/postfix/transport
you think it useful for normal use and what are the major providers to be
added to this file
all testimonials are welcome
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu
Hello folks
Hello list.
I just set up the multi-line greeting patch .
So I have to declare another banner and surprise the result is not comparable
with the official documentation.
I do not understand the system of newline \ n
this is not working
what is the right solution
--
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 20:54, Wietse Venema a écrit :
m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
I just set up the multi-line greeting patch .
What patch? The official Postfix documentation has no multi-line
banner support.
is it possible to declare a personal banner
http://postfix.wl0.org/en/smtpd
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 21:27, Wietse Venema a écrit :
m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 20:54, Wietse Venema a ?crit?:
m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
I just set up the multi-line greeting patch .
What patch? The official Postfix documentation has no multi-line
banner
Le lundi 27 juin 2011 00:59, Wietse Venema a écrit :
m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
this patch it is safe ?
http://pastebin.com/
Ask the maintainer. I don't review code unless I have plains to
maintain it.
Wietse
I do not know the day of simon mudd github now I know
thanks
hi folks
hi Wietse
hi mouss
are you ready ?
This is a general question on improvements to a standard config postscreen
with postfix 2.8.2
this my config :
r13151 ~]# postconf -n | egrep postscreen
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks
postscreen_bare_newline_action = ignore
Le vendredi 17 juin 2011 20:44, Wietse Venema a écrit :
That is not postconf -n output. There are too many lines of output.
I assure you this is my exit.
[root@r13151 ~]# postconf -n | egrep postscreen
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks
postscreen_bare_newline_action = ignore
Le vendredi 17 juin 2011 20:54, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:44:52PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
r13151 ~]# postconf -n | egrep postscreen
That is not postconf -n output. There are too many lines of output.
Or the OP tweaked or cloned default values of too many
Le vendredi 17 juin 2011 21:39, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
In that case you've over-engineered your configuration as was my guess.
Now you need to construct something more restrained.
So I understand
how to build something cleaner
--
Le vendredi 17 juin 2011 21:54, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:44:00PM +0200, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
Le vendredi 17 juin 2011 21:39, Victor Duchovni a ?crit?:
In that case you've over-engineered your configuration as was my guess.
Now you need to construct
Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 19:06, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Petre Bandac:
hello
in the last period I had several complains about mail originating from
yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
logging in the logs I found entries like this:
###
Jun 16 10:07:12 mx postfix/smtpd[27072]:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 00:28, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 6/10/2011 4:04 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up with information like this
/^Received:/IGNORE
/^User-Agent:/ IGNORE
header_checks =
19 matches
Mail list logo
