On 01.10.23 00:00, mailmary--- via Postfix-users wrote:
In my case, libspf2 is a dependent package of OpenDMARC
(Alma Linux, Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux)
Debian too, but this problem should only appear opendmarc does SPF
resolution.
This seems only to happen when SPFSelfValidate is true and
OpenDMARC only uses libspf2 if
(a) it was compiled with SPF support and with libspf2 includes
(configure options --with-spf --with-spf2-include --with-spf2-lib)
and
(b) configuration parameter SPFSelfValidate is enabled.
Item (a) is the case for example in the Debian and Ubuntu package,
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 01:58:17PM -0800, Mike via Postfix-users wrote:
> This is probably obvious to most, but not being a current user of
> DKIM/DMARC, why don't you verify DKIM, or enforce DMARC for inbound
> mail?
The "problems" that DMARC attempts to solve aren't an issue on my end.
I don't
Mike via Postfix-users:
>
> Quoting Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 12:00:25AM +0300, mailmary--- via
> > Postfix-users wrote:
> >
> >> In my case, libspf2 is a dependent package of OpenDMARC
> >
> > Not surprising, since DMARC takes both DKIM and SPF into
Quoting Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 12:00:25AM +0300, mailmary--- via
Postfix-users wrote:
In my case, libspf2 is a dependent package of OpenDMARC
Not surprising, since DMARC takes both DKIM and SPF into account.
On my system, I sign outgoing mail with
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 12:00:25AM +0300, mailmary--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> In my case, libspf2 is a dependent package of OpenDMARC
Not surprising, since DMARC takes both DKIM and SPF into account.
On my system, I sign outgoing mail with DKIM, but neither verify DKIM
signatures, nor
In my case, libspf2 is a dependent package of OpenDMARC
(Alma Linux, Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux)
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 16:47:30 -0400 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Recent news of security issues in Exim appear to in part implicate
> libspf2.
>
> While Postfix does not directly
