Yu (Irvin) Fan:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> Thanks for the quick answer. Can I say that the postfix performance is
> affected by small file read/write speed of the disk?
Many email messages small. Therefore performance is dominated by
rotational and seek latencies (absent a large persistent buffer
between t
Hi Wietse,
Thanks for the quick answer. Can I say that the postfix performance is
affected by small file read/write speed of the disk?
Anyway, I have another related question. We have an after-queue content
filter written in Perl. The email is fed to the filter using pipe as
suggested in the foll
Wietse Venema:
> Yu (Irvin) Fan:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're building a box to run two postfix instances to receive and send high
> > volume of emails. According to the documentation it's better to run the two
> > instances on separate disks for performance reason. I'm trying to understand
> > how exact
Yu (Irvin) Fan:
> Hi,
>
> We're building a box to run two postfix instances to receive and send high
> volume of emails. According to the documentation it's better to run the two
> instances on separate disks for performance reason. I'm trying to understand
> how exactly does the disk I/O affect t
Hi,
We're building a box to run two postfix instances to receive and send high
volume of emails. According to the documentation it's better to run the two
instances on separate disks for performance reason. I'm trying to understand
how exactly does the disk I/O affect the postfix performance? By s
