Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-07 Thread Victoriano Giralt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote: Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The mapping between an

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-07 Thread Fran Garcia
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:02, Victoriano Giralt wrote: On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote: Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ...  which can be implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The mapping

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-07 Thread Victoriano Giralt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/07/2010 01:24 PM, Fran Garcia wrote: http://wiki.rediris.es/gtschema/Portada I'm getting a Mediawiki internal error there, does it work for you? Works for me right now (Wed Jul 7 13:29:29 CEST 2010) - -- Victoriano Giralt Systems Manager

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-07 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200 Victoriano Giralt victori...@uma.es articulated: On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote: Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be implemented via

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-07 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST, Jerry postfix-u...@seibercom.net wrote: On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200 Victoriano Giralt victori...@uma.es articulated: I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions for mail routing and is in use in several Universities and Higher

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-07 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote: On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST, Jerry postfix-u...@seibercom.net wrote: On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200 Victoriano Giralt victori...@uma.es articulated: I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-06 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote: Basically the schema should : - Be OpenLDAP compatible Not a problem. - Allow multidomain I don't know what this means. - Host transports for each defined account / email address. This is not a good idea. Avoid using LDAP for

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-06 Thread postfix
This site uses LDAP for postfix/dovecot administration since about ten years. We use qmailControl.schema (to define the domains, which are accepted at this site) and qmail.schema (to define the mailboxes whithin these domains). suomi On 2010-07-06 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Sat, Jul

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-06 Thread Fran Garcia
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote: Basically the schema should : - Be OpenLDAP compatible Not a problem. - Allow multidomain I don't know what this means. Hi Viktor, thanks for your reply. This means be

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-06 Thread Terry Inzauro
On 07/06/2010 04:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote: On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote: FWITW, I've used this as a reference in the past. After you build a few of these systems, They become quite easy. http://phamm.org/

Re: OT: ldap schema

2010-07-06 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:22:47PM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote: - Allow multidomain I don't know what this means. Hi Viktor, thanks for your reply. This means be able to hold several virtual domains as destination. Think of an ISP configuring a shared email platform for several domains

OT: ldap schema

2010-07-02 Thread Fran Garcia
Hi all, I'm planning now a LDAP-based Postfix setup and struggling designing the how the LDAP schema should look like. Basically the schema should : - Be OpenLDAP compatible - Allow multidomain - Host transports for each defined account / email address. - Integrate with dovecot and/or