Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 14 December 2017 at 00:13, Maarten wrote: > Where can I find documentation on all the settings of the amavis-new > configuration file. The only documentation I can find is about how to > set it up with postfix in README.postfix. There are some comments in > the

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Maarten
bericht- >>> Van: postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com >>> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Bill Cole >>> Verzonden: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46 >>> Aan: Postfix users >>> Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavis

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Bill Cole
On 13 Dec 2017, at 11:01 (-0500), L.P.H. van Belle wrote: No, i know it runs fine, after about 2-3 milion emails processed, i know .. Really.. My vague recollection of MailScanner's inherent risk is that it is volume-dependent, i.e. it might never cause any problem with a million messages

RE: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread L . P . H . van Belle
mber 2017 16:56 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle; Postfix users > Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new > > On 12/13/2017 10:52 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > Hai, > > > > > > mailscanner runs fine here for about 5-6 years now, with postfix. &

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread John Peach
: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46 Aan: Postfix users Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten wrote: According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works too. https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/ Yes, and there's a link

RE: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread L . P . H . van Belle
t; Van: postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Bill Cole > Verzonden: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46 > Aan: Postfix users > Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new > > On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Bill Cole
On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten wrote: According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works too. https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/ Yes, and there's a link at the bottom of that page to the postfix.org add-on page which specifically warns against MailScanner.

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 13.12.17 11:13, Maarten wrote: I'll have a look at amavisd-new after the new year since that seems to be the more update one. So with amvisd-new you can also do spam filtering, use different scanners, filename blocking etc? yes. On 2017-12-13 11:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: MailScanner

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Maarten
I'll have a look at amavisd-new after the new year since that seems to be the more update one. So with amvisd-new you can also do spam filtering, use different scanners, filename blocking etc? On 2017-12-13 11:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2017-12-13 Maarten wrote: According to their

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2017-12-13 Maarten wrote: > According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works > too. > > https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/ MailScanner operates on Postfix internal structures (namely the mail queue). Postfix does not make guarantees about these (meaning they might be

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Maarten
According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works too. https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/ What would be the advantage to switching to something like amavisd-new? . On 2017-12-13 10:28, Benny Pedersen wrote: Maarten skrev den 2017-12-13 10:11: I use MailScanner, I'm

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Benny Pedersen
Maarten skrev den 2017-12-13 10:11: I use MailScanner, I'm happy so far with it. bad solotion with postfix, since mailscanner uses queue dirs directly, this is not supported in postfix, mailscanner is designed for sendmail only, dont try other mta with it

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Maarten
I use MailScanner, I'm happy so far with it. On 2017-12-13 10:05, Benny Pedersen wrote: John Stoffel skrev den 2017-12-12 16:53: Now to figure out why spamassisin as a milter ain't working properly... try rmilter, configure it for spamd, so you dont need to use spamc :=) same auhor as

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Benny Pedersen
John Stoffel skrev den 2017-12-12 16:53: Now to figure out why spamassisin as a milter ain't working properly... try rmilter, configure it for spamd, so you dont need to use spamc :=) same auhor as rspamd maked it, rmilter is now depricated, hopefully he wont delete it ucl was born to

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-13 Thread Benny Pedersen
Sven Schwedas skrev den 2017-12-12 16:12: On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote: I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-12 Thread J Doe
On Dec 12, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote: >>> I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using >>> amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? > >> On 12.12.17 16:12,

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote: I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? On 12.12.17 16:12, Sven Schwedas wrote: There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know of

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-12 Thread John Stoffel
> "Sven" == Sven Schwedas writes: Sven> On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using >> amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? Sven> There's nothing wrong with

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-12 Thread Sven Schwedas
On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using > amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know of is Rspamd. > The site I have

Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-12 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/12/2017 3:55 AM, J Doe wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using > amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? > > The site I have this in mind for receives a moderate amount of e-mail per day. > > This appears

Question regarding use of amavisd-new

2017-12-12 Thread J Doe
Hi, I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? The site I have this in mind for receives a moderate amount of e-mail per day. This appears to be the most mentioned configuration via web