On 14 December 2017 at 00:13, Maarten wrote:
> Where can I find documentation on all the settings of the amavis-new
> configuration file. The only documentation I can find is about how to
> set it up with postfix in README.postfix. There are some comments in
> the
bericht-
>>> Van: postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com
>>> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Bill Cole
>>> Verzonden: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46
>>> Aan: Postfix users
>>> Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavis
On 13 Dec 2017, at 11:01 (-0500), L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
No, i know it runs fine, after about 2-3 milion emails processed, i
know .. Really..
My vague recollection of MailScanner's inherent risk is that it is
volume-dependent, i.e. it might never cause any problem with a million
messages
mber 2017 16:56
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle; Postfix users
> Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new
>
> On 12/13/2017 10:52 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> > Hai,
> >
> >
> > mailscanner runs fine here for about 5-6 years now, with postfix.
&
: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46
Aan: Postfix users
Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new
On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten wrote:
According to their documentation using MailScanner with
postfix works
too.
https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/
Yes, and there's a link
t; Van: postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Bill Cole
> Verzonden: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46
> Aan: Postfix users
> Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new
>
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten
On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten wrote:
According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works
too.
https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/
Yes, and there's a link at the bottom of that page to the postfix.org
add-on page which specifically warns against MailScanner.
On 13.12.17 11:13, Maarten wrote:
I'll have a look at amavisd-new after the new year since that seems
to be the more update one.
So with amvisd-new you can also do spam filtering, use different
scanners, filename blocking etc?
yes.
On 2017-12-13 11:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
MailScanner
I'll have a look at amavisd-new after the new year since that seems to
be the more update one.
So with amvisd-new you can also do spam filtering, use different
scanners, filename blocking etc?
On 2017-12-13 11:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2017-12-13 Maarten wrote:
According to their
On 2017-12-13 Maarten wrote:
> According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works
> too.
>
> https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/
MailScanner operates on Postfix internal structures (namely the mail
queue). Postfix does not make guarantees about these (meaning they might
be
According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works
too.
https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/
What would be the advantage to switching to something like amavisd-new?
.
On 2017-12-13 10:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Maarten skrev den 2017-12-13 10:11:
I use MailScanner, I'm
Maarten skrev den 2017-12-13 10:11:
I use MailScanner, I'm happy so far with it.
bad solotion with postfix, since mailscanner uses queue dirs directly,
this is not supported in postfix, mailscanner is designed for sendmail
only, dont try other mta with it
I use MailScanner, I'm happy so far with it.
On 2017-12-13 10:05, Benny Pedersen wrote:
John Stoffel skrev den 2017-12-12 16:53:
Now to figure out why spamassisin as a milter ain't working
properly...
try rmilter, configure it for spamd, so you dont need to use spamc :=)
same auhor as
John Stoffel skrev den 2017-12-12 16:53:
Now to figure out why spamassisin as a milter ain't working
properly...
try rmilter, configure it for spamd, so you dont need to use spamc :=)
same auhor as rspamd maked it, rmilter is now depricated, hopefully he
wont delete it
ucl was born to
Sven Schwedas skrev den 2017-12-12 16:12:
On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote:
I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using
amavisd-new
when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know
On Dec 12, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote:
>>> I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using
>>> amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
>
>> On 12.12.17 16:12,
On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote:
I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using amavisd-new
when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
On 12.12.17 16:12, Sven Schwedas wrote:
There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know of
> "Sven" == Sven Schwedas writes:
Sven> On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using
>> amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
Sven> There's nothing wrong with
On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using
> amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know of
is Rspamd.
> The site I have
On 12/12/2017 3:55 AM, J Doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using
> amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
>
> The site I have this in mind for receives a moderate amount of e-mail per day.
>
> This appears
Hi,
I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using amavisd-new
when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
The site I have this in mind for receives a moderate amount of e-mail per day.
This appears to be the most mentioned configuration via web
21 matches
Mail list logo