On 12/1/16 1:35 PM, Fongaboo wrote:
But can they really blame the middleman (us) for mail that is just
passing through our hands?
Yes they can, and they do. Unlike Google, which seems able to mostly
usally eventually figure this out, Yahoo mail has *always* been a source
of frustration
org>
Subject: RE: Banned by Yahoo?
This sounds like a great idea. Where do you actually specify AOL's mail
servers for this rule?
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
> Hi, I throttle my traffic to AOL and HOTMAIL, maybe you need to do the same
> for Yahoo.
> I had to lo
This sounds like a great idea. Where do you actually specify AOL's mail
servers for this rule?
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
Hi, I throttle my traffic to AOL and HOTMAIL, maybe you need to do the same for
Yahoo.
I had to lookup each ISP's limits to configure it in Postfix to
Fongaboo:
[forwarding spam to Yahoo and getting blocked]
> But can they really blame the middleman (us) for mail that is just passing
> through our hands? I mean, I understand it's possible for them to do
Absolutely. Yahoo is not the only one who does this, by the way.
Wietse
Hi, I throttle my traffic to AOL and HOTMAIL, maybe you need to do the same for
Yahoo.
I had to lookup each ISP's limits to configure it in Postfix to help with all
the mail to them getting deferred.
I must say it has been years since users complained about mail not getting
delivered to those
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:35:40PM -0500, Fongaboo wrote:
> However we do have virtual aliases on hosted domains that ultimately point
> to yahoo.com addresses. Undoubtedly, I can reference instances of spam
> received to the virtual and then forwarded on to Yahoo's mailserver from
> there.
>
>
