Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
Having a problem understanding where my issue is with AV for this one (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives mx1# grep 8024C2E2BD /var/log/maillog Feb 24 08:33:45 mx1 postfix/cleanup[7752]: 8024C2E2BD:

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Fitzpatrick: (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives ... Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/smtp[6812]: 8024C2E2BD: to=tmia...@example.com, relay=x.x.x.x[x.x.x.x]:25, delay=10, delays=0.01/0.01/5.1/5,

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Fitzpatrick: On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Fitzpatrick: (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives ... Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/smtp[6812]: 8024C2E2BD:

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: Robert Fitzpatrick: On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Fitzpatrick: (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives ... Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/smtp[6812]:

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On 2/24/2012 3:40 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Fitzpatrick: On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Fitzpatrick: (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives ... Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On 2/24/2012 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: There is also is some logic to prevent a negative probe result from replacing a positive result. This is needed because Postfix will try to refresh a probe result before it expires. Just read this after my last post. Perhaps this explains, the address

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Fitzpatrick: On 2/24/2012 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: There is also is some logic to prevent a negative probe result from replacing a positive result. This is needed because Postfix will try to refresh a probe result before it expires. Just read this after my last post. Perhaps

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Fitzpatrick: But unlike other domains that we transport for, I do not see the NOQUEUE reject log entries for this user address, I do see the deliveries for If you don't save the probe result, then the result is thrown away. Telepathic computing is not yet commercially available.

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-02-24 4:33 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: That is explained in my two sentences above. I am not a pervert who has a better explanation but refuses to share it. Maybe not, but you definitely have one of the driest senses of humor I've ever seen... thanks for making me

Re: Understanding address verification

2012-02-24 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On 2/24/2012 4:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: That is the part I didn't understand. What exactly triggers the other rejections I see with NOQUEUE? I thought each message would be rejected What other rejections? You have shown nothing. Yes, for I have failed to post all that I have referenced...