I have been asked to replace the MUA Message-ID of SASL senders with a
Postfix-generated ID. The Message-ID of incoming mail which arrives via the
same Postfix instance, but does not originate from a SASL authenticated
sender, should not be touched. The submission service runs on port 587. Are
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:38:22AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
This works as I'd expect, but will it break anything else?
Yes. It will break the complete mail handling of the client. _Never_
ever touch a message id.
Bastian
--
Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude.
--
Hi
I have been running a postfix/courier mailserver with virtual users and
Maildir for a while.
Now I need to setup a mailinglist and I have choosen mailman.
The installation of mailman did work well but somewhere I fail to get
the aliasing work properlly.
I get the following errorlog in
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
I have been asked to replace the MUA Message-ID of SASL senders with a
Postfix-generated ID. The Message-ID of incoming mail which arrives via the
same Postfix instance, but does not originate from a SASL authenticated
sender, should not be touched. The submission
Göran Höglund a écrit :
[snip]
Feb 8 11:34:11 apollo postfix/smtpd[11557]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[172.16.254.4]: 550 5.1.1 test-...@x.se: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table; from=go...@x.se
to=test-...@x.se proto=ESMTP
Hi
Sorry my fault! I did change the original listname and made an error in
the snippet.
Here is the correct errorlog:
Feb 8 13:06:05 apollo postfix/smtpd[12115]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[172.16.254.4]: 550 5.1.1 test_...@telemar.se: Recipient
address rejected: User unknown in
Göran Höglund a écrit :
Hi
Sorry my fault! I did change the original listname and made an error in
the snippet.
Here is the correct errorlog:
Feb 8 13:06:05 apollo postfix/smtpd[12115]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[172.16.254.4]: 550 5.1.1 test_...@telemar.se: Recipient
address
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:38:22AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
This works as I'd expect, but will it break anything else?
Yes. It will break the complete mail handling of the client. _Never_
ever touch a message id.
Do explain how adding/replacing
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:13:53AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
Yes. It will break the complete mail handling of the client. _Never_
ever touch a message id.
Do explain how adding/replacing a valid Message-ID only to submitted mail
will break the
Bastian Blank a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:13:53AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
Yes. It will break the complete mail handling of the client. _Never_
ever touch a message id.
Do explain how adding/replacing a valid Message-ID only to submitted
mouss wrote:
and if a spam filter blocks/discards/quarantines mail because of this,
it is the filter that should be blamed.
I use this setup for detecting Backscatter. Until now without problems,
but it's difficult to know.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 06:22:17PM +0100, mouss wrote:
I mean replacing or deleting already set Message-Id headers. And it will
break MUA driven thread handling
- very few people put their Sent mail in the same folders as received mail
- even then, MUAs have heuristics to cope with such
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:37:20PM +0800, jan gestre wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 02:55:28PM +0800, jan gestre wrote:
Where is the best place to put the DNS caching resolver? in the NAT
device? or
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 06:22:17PM +0100, mouss wrote:
I mean replacing or deleting already set Message-Id headers. And it will
break MUA driven thread handling
- very few people put their Sent mail in the same folders as received mail
- even then, MUAs have
On Feb 8, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Bastian Blank bastian+postfix-users=postfix@waldi.eu.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:13:53AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
Yes. It will break the complete mail handling of the client. _Never_
ever touch a message
On Feb 8, 2009, at 1:02 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 06:22:17PM +0100, mouss wrote:
I mean replacing or deleting already set Message-Id headers. And
it will
break MUA driven thread handling
- very few people put their Sent mail in
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 18:22:17 PM +0100, mouss wrote:
I mean replacing or deleting already set Message-Id headers. And
it will break MUA driven thread handling
- very few people put their Sent mail in the same folders as
- received mail even then, MUAs have heuristics to cope with such
-
Good day.
I am have spent spent some time trying to figure out if the following
Postfix config is possible and am hoping for some guidance.
Short Synopsis:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account. While there are only a
Tony Demark:
Good day.
I am have spent spent some time trying to figure out if the following
Postfix config is possible and am hoping for some guidance.
Short Synopsis:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account.
M. Fioretti a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 18:22:17 PM +0100, mouss wrote:
I mean replacing or deleting already set Message-Id headers. And
it will break MUA driven thread handling
- very few people put their Sent mail in the same folders as
- received mail even then, MUAs have heuristics to
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 09:08:32PM +0100, mouss wrote:
No, I was referring to the Sent folder, populated by the MUA, either
in a local disk or using IMAP.
I know some people clever-enough to set Sent == Inbox, yes this is not
very common.
I personally have rules that tag outgoing mail into
On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tony Demark:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account. While there are only a
handful of accounts, most of the accounts have many aliases and have
used '-' as a recipient
Tony Demark:
On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tony Demark:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account. While there are only a
handful of accounts, most of the accounts have many aliases and have
used
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 09:08:32PM +0100, mouss wrote:
No, I was referring to the Sent folder, populated by the MUA, either
in a local disk or using IMAP.
I know some people clever-enough to set Sent == Inbox, yes this is not
very common.
I personally have
On Feb 8, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tony Demark:
On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tony Demark:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account. While there are only a
handful of accounts, most of the
Tony Demark a écrit :
On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tony Demark:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account. While there are only a
handful of accounts, most of the accounts have many aliases and have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is listed. I made changes to postfix
but its still rejecting, here is the extract of the main.cf and the rules.
I don't understand why its
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is listed. I made changes to postfix
but its still rejecting, here is the extract of the main.cf and the rules.
I don't understand why its not
Tony Demark:
If the original server gets an email addressed to 'me-
foo...@example.com', I need the email to be relayed to
'm...@example.com', not 'me-foo...@example.com'.
/^(.+)(-.+)?...@example\.com$/$...@example.com
OK ... I think I got this figured out. It ended up that the
Hi,
I'm configuring postfix to use LDAP as backend db. I have to deal
with something that i don't know how to do.
For example, i have this conf file:
server_host = localhost
server_port = 389
bind = yes
bind_dn = cn=admin,dc=foobar,dc=com
bind_pw = aaa
cache = no
search_base =
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/02/2009, at 10:09, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is listed. I made changes to
postfix
but its still
David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is listed. I made changes to postfix
but its still rejecting, here is the extract of the main.cf and the rules.
I
Victor Duchovni wrote, at 02/08/2009 03:37 PM:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 09:08:32PM +0100, mouss wrote:
No, I was referring to the Sent folder, populated by the MUA, either
in a local disk or using IMAP.
I know some people clever-enough to set Sent == Inbox, yes this is not
very common.
I
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/02/2009, at 10:38, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is listed. I made changes
David Cottle wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/02/2009, at 10:38, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is
On Feb 8, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
To make this work without false matches, you will need to enumerate
the user names.
/^(user1|user2|user3)(-.+)?...@example\.com$/$...@example.com
/^(user4|user5|user6)(-.+)?...@example\.com$/$...@example.com
False positives will cause
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/02/2009, at 11:12, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
David Cottle wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/02/2009, at 10:38, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have got RBL
Good evening,
I recently enabled reject_unverified_sender in my postfix configuration,
but it seems like it fails when the server against which the sender is
verified uses greylisting. I've been getting log entries like (@ were
replaced by _AT_):
Feb 8 07:56:49 atlas postfix/smtpd[25949]:
Jo?o Miguel Neves:
Good evening,
I recently enabled reject_unverified_sender in my postfix configuration,
but it seems like it fails when the server against which the sender is
verified uses greylisting. I've been getting log entries like (@ were
replaced by _AT_):
Feb 8 07:56:49 atlas
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
Yes all the files (whitelist, check_backscatterer and
check_spamcannibal) have been postmap.
I assume that as long as the whitelist is done first, anything that
is ok in the file simply should 'brute force' past the rest of the
checks, no
-d
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is listed. I made changes to postfix
but its still rejecting, here is the extract of the main.cf and the rules.
I don't understand why its not
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 06:38:31PM -0500, Manuel Mely wrote:
Hi,
I'm configuring postfix to use LDAP as backend db. I have to deal
with something that i don't know how to do.
For example, i have this conf file:
server_host = localhost
server_port = 389
bind = yes
bind_dn =
Quoting Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
Yes all the files (whitelist, check_backscatterer and
check_spamcannibal) have been postmap.
I assume that as long as the whitelist is done first, anything that
is ok in the file simply should 'brute force' past
Quoting Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
Yes all the files (whitelist, check_backscatterer and
check_spamcannibal) have been postmap.
I assume that as long as the whitelist is done first, anything that
is ok in the file simply should 'brute force' past
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of
webmas...@aus-city.com
Sent: Monday, 9 February 2009 3:21 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org; Sahil Tandon
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: whitelisting not
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
Quoting Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
Yes all the files (whitelist, check_backscatterer and
check_spamcannibal) have been postmap.
I assume that as long as the whitelist is done first, anything
Quoting Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
Quoting Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
Yes all the files (whitelist, check_backscatterer and
check_spamcannibal) have been postmap.
I assume that as long as
Hi:
I would appreciate any advice anyone can offer on how best to achieve
this behavior:
I am trying to figure out the best way to map one domain to another
with the same users...precisely the behavior I am trying to achieve
is: when mail is sent (from outside, or from another user
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 09:50:16PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
I am trying to figure out the best way to map one domain to another with
the same users...precisely the behavior I am trying to achieve is: when
mail is sent (from outside, or from another user within my postfix
Hi,
I have configured SMTP-AUTH, this is maily to allow sending from
outside network. as per your suggestion can i use check_sender_access?
Thanks Regards,
Ramesh
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, MacShane, Tracy tracy.macsh...@...
wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I want to have multiple incoming hostnames to match my domains so it
passes spam checks better.
I found this:
http://www.linuxmail.info/postfix-multiple-ip-address-smtp-greeting/
exactly what I want except it does not work :(
master.cf
51 matches
Mail list logo
