Zitat von George Forman georgeforma...@hotmail.com:
Hi,
I am running into a problem where (it seems) queue manager
doesn't pickup the queued message for delivery. SMTPD returns
a 250 OK at 16:26:39. However, oqmgr doesn't pick it up until 16:35:41.
The is no post queue processing on the
Hi,
I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix.
I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this
content filter?
It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow.
Thanks
/etc/aliases:
local_user:local_user, other_u...@domain
--
ToMasz
2009/12/12 mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net:
K K a écrit :
Hi all,
I would like to forward all mail as they come(with the same envelope
recipient addr.)
- it is not problem to do it with transport_map, for example:
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to
recreate it again.
It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default,
Is
On 12/14/2009, Jaroslaw Grzabel (ja...@meil.me) wrote:
Simon Waters pisze:
It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default, so within 3 days jon
starts getting email (and spam potentially). This is configurable.
http://www.postfix.org/verify.8.html
Yeah, and it works on the other way round... if
On 12/15/2009 6:59 AM, Walter Breno wrote:
The problem is that my logs doesn't report any error, here is the log
connect from host[200.xxx.xxx.xxx]
9B2B16015997C: client=host[200.xxx.xxx.xxx], sasl_method=LOGIN,
sasl_username=u...@server.domain.com mailto:u...@server.domain.com
9B2B16015997C:
On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to
recreate it again.
Stefan F?rster:
While I certainly like the fact that Postfix becomes more and more
admin friendly in that it now also logs warnings about performance
issues, I'd like to know how many milliseconds a single request to
update the temporary whitelist may take before a warning is emitted.
Is it
On 12/15/2009 5:21 AM, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix.
I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this
content filter?
No.
It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow.
If you write your
Giovanni Mancuso:
Hi,
I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix.
I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this
content filter?
It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow.
The queue ID is in the first RECEIVED: message
On 12/15/09 5:16 PM, vi...@wlcr.net wrote:
Received: from 58.18.216.190 by example.com; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:13:56 +0800
See the first received line: Received: from 58.18.216.190 by
example.com; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:13:56 +0800
localhost line is caused your content filter that lives at
On 12/15/2009, Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote:
On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until I will not be
notified and
Did this email really originate from my server?
How did it get sent?
Has an account been compromised or is Postfix improperly configured?
Thanks!
MESSAGE SOURCE:
=
Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON
Delivered-To: vi...@example.com
Received: from
Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to
Mark Goodge:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
I will not be notified and remove the database
Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
The cache has two main functions:
1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and
reduce load on both.
2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail
acceptance/rejection when the destination server is unreachable.
If the
Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
The cache has two main functions:
1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and
reduce load on both.
2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail
acceptance/rejection when the
To speed up postscreen, is there any advantage in, eg, harvesting high-volume
pregreet or dnsbl IPs into a blacklist that would be more efficient than
pregreet or dnsbl dropping?
Len
In fact the problem is not on postfix, i'm using mailscanner and i set
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks and the content of the
file is: /^Received:/ HOLD, when i comment the line on main.cf the mails are
sended correctly.
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Stefan Foerster:
Is it 100ms? I got exactly 882 messages like
postscreen[5486]: warning: ps_dict_put: /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db update
took 108 ms
with values ranging from 101 to 147 within the last 24 hours on a
moderately busy system.
Stefan Foerster:
Probably unrelated: When does postscreen(8) clean up it's database?
Periodically? Every X connections? Never? What database sizes are to
be expected?
The delete old records thread is not yet implemented. I suggest
that you rotate the cache file each Saturday night
Len Conrad:
To speed up postscreen, is there any advantage in, eg, harvesting
high-volume pregreet or dnsbl IPs into a blacklist that would be
more efficient than pregreet or dnsbl dropping?
High-volume pregreet - yes, as long as you use a fast database.
High-volume DNSBL - maybe. The DNS
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:21:53 -0300
Walter Breno walter...@gmail.com replied:
In fact the problem is not on postfix, i'm using mailscanner and i set
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks and the content of
the file is: /^Received:/ HOLD, when i comment the line on main.cf the
mails are
and what do you recommend to use? proc mail? i'm testing the best set of
tools for my mail server and accepting sujestions, i'm using spamassassin
and clamav here, i'm sorry i know that is off topic but with a good set of
tools the mail server will have best performance.
Thanks for help
* Walter Breno walter...@gmail.com:
and what do you recommend to use? proc mail? i'm testing the best set of
Best practise on the Postfix mailing list is to use only anti-spam tools that
do not interfere with Postfix internals e.g. the queue mechanisms etc.
tools for my mail server and
On 12/15/2009 4:03 PM, Walter Breno wrote:
Thanks for the answers, i'm testing the implementation of a modest
server, i have only 15xx accounts near 2000, it's only one domain, i
have a centralized OpenLDAP server where my mail authenticates, i'm
using cyrus-sasl, using submission port to
nunatarsuaq a écrit :
/etc/aliases:
local_user:local_user, other_u...@domain
please do not top post. google if you don't see what this means.
anyway, reread OP and focus on with the same envelope recipient addr.
the bcc options are the easiest way to do what he wants with stock
People are sending to a name domain and yet most of their suppliers
are getting bouncing stating error in domain.
I check the DNS record and the MX is correct.
The virtual and the amin.cf files are also correct.
Where else sould I look?
--
Member - Liberal International This is
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, The Doctor wrote:
People are sending to a name domain and yet most of their suppliers
are getting bouncing stating error in domain.
This makes no sense; show some logs that correspond to the 'problem' you
are trying to solve.
I check the DNS record and the MX is correct.
29 matches
Mail list logo
