I tried but nothing in that page seems to help me
Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
Am 20.01.2010 12:48, schrieb luca:
Hi,
Yes I know it is not a bug.
I would like to know if it is possible to configure postfix so that the
answers it gives to
the Exchange Server instruments it to avoid producin
Am 21.01.2010 10:12, schrieb luca:
> I tried but nothing in that page seems to help me
>
> Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
>> Am 20.01.2010 12:48, schrieb luca:
>>
>>> Hi,
as i understand
http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html
you can disable dsn
for the exchange ip
Use the smtpd_discard_ehlo_
Hi all,
I've got Postfix running on two machines balanced with lvs, the
configuration is obviously identical on every machine, but in only on
one of them and with some messages i see this kind of error message in
the log:
Jan 21 11:52:55 mail-2 postfix/error[4716]: E2B4A208256:
to=, relay=no
On 2010-01-19, Stan Hoeppner (s...@hardwarefreak.com) wrote:
> So now I get to file a bug report on T-Bird as it's clearly not processing the
> headers correctly or obeying "custom" headers I plug in. Hell, it won't even
> filter on Sender: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org for Pete's sake and Sende
RaSca:
> Hi all,
> I've got Postfix running on two machines balanced with lvs, the
> configuration is obviously identical on every machine, but in only on
> one of them and with some messages i see this kind of error message in
> the log:
>
> Jan 21 11:52:55 mail-2 postfix/error[4716]: E2B4A208
Hello,
I have a Postfix daemon that handles just one task - receive bounces
(user not found, autoresponders, temporary server errors). It simply
pipes all messages to a "| usr/local/bin/script.pl". The reason I don't
have the Perl app listening on port 25 itself is SPAM and other attacks
that
Hi,
Quick question. I couldn't find an answer in documentation, but that
probably means I can't do it but just to confirm.
Is there any way to setup address_verify_sender setup value to use
original sender email address ?
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
Jarek
* Jaroslaw Grzabel :
> Quick question. I couldn't find an answer in documentation, but that
> probably means I can't do it but just to confirm.
>
> Is there any way to setup address_verify_sender setup value to use
> original sender email address ?
Which sender? If anton sends mail to bertha, the
Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 13:08:02 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) ha scritto:
[...]
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Look for obvious signs of trouble
Hi,
I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group.
As i wrote, Postfix works perfectly exce
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Which sender? If anton sends mail to bertha, the the verification is done HOW?
>
> Like:
> MAIL FROM:
> RCPT TO:
> ?
>
>
Hi Ralf,
If emails comes from an...@domain.com to ber...@otherdomain.com I would
like to check it sending original data, so to ask otherdomain.com s
* Jaroslaw Grzabel :
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Which sender? If anton sends mail to bertha, the the verification is done
> > HOW?
> >
> > Like:
> > MAIL FROM:
> > RCPT TO:
> > ?
> >
> >
> Hi Ralf,
>
> If emails comes from an...@domain.com to ber...@otherdomain.com I would
> like to check i
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Some systems block mail if sender and recipient are the same!
> Especially if THEIR sender is used coming from the outside...
>
Sorry but It's not that what I meant. You misunderstood me.
> BUT verifiying mail from an...@domain.com to ber...@otherdomain.com
> using "ber
Hi,
I'd like postfix to treat EX_CANTCREAT (73) as "temporary failure".
I use this command to deliver my mails:
mailbox_command = /usr/bin/formail -D 8192 ~/.msgid.cache
-s /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
The problem is that if the filesystem containing home directories is not
mounted, formail ret
On 2010-01-21 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> Which sender? If anton sends mail to bertha, the the verification is
>> done HOW?
>>
>> Like:
>> MAIL FROM:
>> RCPT TO:
>> ?
>
> If emails comes from an...@domain.com to ber...@otherdomain.com I
> would like to check it sending ori
* Jaroslaw Grzabel :
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Some systems block mail if sender and recipient are the same!
> > Especially if THEIR sender is used coming from the outside...
> >
> Sorry but It's not that what I meant. You misunderstood me.
> > BUT verifiying mail from an...@domain.com to be
* Ansgar Wiechers :
> Sounds to me like you're trying to do something like callback
> verification [1].
Yes he is. We're talking about details of that here.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenb
On 2010-01-21 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Ansgar Wiechers :
>> Sounds to me like you're trying to do something like callback
>> verification [1].
>
> Yes he is. We're talking about details of that here.
I meant to refer him to the "Limitations" section of that article.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> OTOH this could generate loops :) (if both use the same scheme)
Why ? I can't imagine the loop situation. Can you explain in more details ?
Also regarding a verification... I've got a problem with understanding
refresh times and expiry times. For example if I've got POSIT
Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 14:33:16 CET, RaSca ha scritto:
[...]
What else should i check?
I know that these information may be few for giving me help, but I'm
trying to find out a way for understanding what is happening.
Thanks to my friend Mauro, I finally solved the problem.
The problem was
It's nice for a change to work with someone who provides actual
information, instead of that dork from last week who was just
venting his opinions and not giving people a chance to help.
In this case it looks like a Solaris TCP bug when sending data over
a connection that suffers from heavy packet
RaSca:
> > http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
> > Look for obvious signs of trouble
>
> Hi,
> I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group.
I suppose you overlooked this warning then.
Jan 21 15:06:06 mail-2 postfix/qmgr[31542]: warning: connect to
transpo
Seems the solution is very
simple - postfix doesn't care if the pipe closes before reading all
input, so a
$string .= $_ while
( && $lines++<100) will do the trick.
On 1/21/10 2:11 PM, Razvan Cosma wrote:
Hello,
I have a Postfix daemon that handles just one task - receive bounces
(use
Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 16:33:23 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) ha scritto:
RaSca:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Look for obvious signs of trouble
Hi,
I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group.
I suppose you overlooked this warning t
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:30:54 -0500 (EST), wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) wrote:
> It's nice for a change to work with someone who provides actual
> information, instead of that dork from last week who was just
> venting his opinions and not giving people a chance to help.
I don't know how on
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
It's nice for a change to work with someone who provides actual
information, instead of that dork from last week who was just
venting his opinions and not giving people a chance to help.
In this case it looks like a Solaris TCP bug when sending data over
a connection t
RaSca:
> Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 16:33:23 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
> Venema) ha scritto:
> > RaSca:
> >>> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
> >>> Look for obvious signs of trouble
> >> Hi,
> >> I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group.
> > I
Hi list,
I had a problem with my primary mailserver which was not able to deliver
mail to some remote mx's. One of the mx's that we couldn't deliver to was
mx-cluster[1-2].one.com. After I modified the transport maps on
mx1.youngguns.nl (stevie.youngguns.nl) the message now is deliverd to
mx2.youn
Does anyone have a simple guide to setup Postfix to send e-mail? Just from the
local system to one external e-mail address.
I want to send an e-mail from BASH upon login to certain accounts.
-Jason
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 08:51:54AM -0800, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Does anyone have a simple guide to setup Postfix to send e-mail? Just
> from the local system to one external e-mail address.
>
> I want to send an e-mail from BASH upon login to certain accounts.
To submit an email message via a l
Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 17:21:52 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) ha scritto:
[...]
I asked you to egrep '(fatal|panic|error|etc)' but you thought
you knew better and therefore lost time.
Wietse
You don't asked me anything, you just copied and pasted a README file.
You are
RaSca wrote:
Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 17:21:52 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) ha scritto:
[...]
I asked you to egrep '(fatal|panic|error|etc)' but you thought
you knew better and therefore lost time.
Wietse
You don't asked me anything, you just copied and pasted a README file.
Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 18:19:07 CET, Michael Katz ha scritto:
[...]
In short, Wietse has earned a position
of the highest regard and ultimate professional respect and insulting
him is out of line on this list.
In short, I'm not insulting anyone and I'm not frustrated.
Keep up the good work!
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 02:57:17PM +0100, Mickael CANEVET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like postfix to treat EX_CANTCREAT (73) as "temporary failure".
>
> I use this command to deliver my mails:
>
> mailbox_command = /usr/bin/formail -D 8192 ~/.msgid.cache
> -s /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
>
> The pro
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> On 1/20/2010 12:49 PM, Aaron Clausen wrote:
> > Some anti-spam software that works with Exchange can deliver spam
> > messages to a Spam folder in a user's mailbox. Is there any
> > facility in Postfix to allow that
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 02:57:17PM +0100, Mickael CANEVET wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like postfix to treat EX_CANTCREAT (73) as "temporary failure".
> >
> > I use this command to deliver my mails:
> >
> > mailbox_command = /usr/bin/formail -D 8192 ~/.msgid.cache
> > -s /usr
Everyday I have a notification from my virus scanner that a Virus /
Trojan was received from a specific IP:
***
A virus was found: Trojan.Delf-5385
Banned name: .exe,.exe-ms,postcard.htm ... .exe
Scanner detecting a virus: ClamAV-clamd
Content typ
On 1/21/2010 2:34 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> Everyday I have a notification from my virus scanner that a Virus /
> Trojan was received from a specific IP:
>
> The email every day is from the same IP to the same recipient on my
> Postfix server. I have what most of you consider a very small / low
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> This is a client IP not a sender, e. g. 'MAIL FROM: br...@example.com'
>
> The IP should go into a file referenced by a check_client_access
> restriction.
So when I generate a 'check_client_access' file in '/etc/postfix', I
need
On 1/21/2010 3:20 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> wrote:
>
>> This is a client IP not a sender, e. g. 'MAIL FROM: br...@example.com'
>>
>> The IP should go into a file referenced by a check_client_access
>> restriction.
>>
> So whe
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> Since you have 'smtpd_delay_reject = yes', it does not matter.
> All restrictions are processed during 'RCPT TO' time with this (default)
> setting.
> All information about client, helo, sender and recipient are available
> in th
Martijn de Munnik:
> Jan 21 17:02:30 marcus postfix/qmgr[16421]: 523FD1C11A:
> from=, size=650750, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Jan 21 17:02:30 marcus postfix/smtp[16449]: 523FD1C11A: host
> mx-cluster1.one.com[91.198.169.10] said: 450 4.7.1 :
> Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for 5 minutes (in
Charles Marcus put forth on 1/21/2010 6:05 AM:
> On 2010-01-19, Stan Hoeppner (s...@hardwarefreak.com) wrote:
>> So now I get to file a bug report on T-Bird as it's clearly not processing
>> the
>> headers correctly or obeying "custom" headers I plug in. Hell, it won't even
>> filter on Sender: o
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
The client IP address passed along in the policy protocol.
This goes back to my original question. How, using existing Postfix
syntax, can I call the policy daemon - after the IP address and/or
sender authentication has been performed by Postfi
Thanks a lot for your answer.
The filesystem could be unavailable because it is located on NAS. I
don't want my mails to be bounced if the NAS falls.
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 12:58 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 02:57:17PM +0100, Mickael CANEVET wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'
I've wondered for a couple of months why my rbl check is being skipped. I've
not seen a spamhaus entry in my logs since Sept 25 '09. Interestingly, postgrey
is being called now and then, and it is after the rbl check in main.cf. Any
idea why my rbl check is being skipped? What have I screwed up
45 matches
Mail list logo
