Re: Some README files are not included in the postfix-files

2022-01-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Jaroslav Skarvada: > Hi, > > it seems the following README files are not included in the > conf/postfix-files: > BDAT_README > MAILLOG_README > POSTSCREEN_3_5_README > SMTPUTF8_README > > Is it intended? Yikes, these are all "new" files added with Postfix 3.x. I'll add a pre-release check for

Some README files are not included in the postfix-files

2022-01-20 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
Hi, it seems the following README files are not included in the conf/postfix-files: BDAT_README MAILLOG_README POSTSCREEN_3_5_README SMTPUTF8_README Is it intended? Checked with the postfix-3.6.4. Downstream Fedora bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041056 thanks & regards

Re: Some README files are not included in the postfix-files

2022-01-20 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 21.01.22 um 00:06 schrieb Wietse Venema: Jaroslav Skarvada: Hi, it seems the following README files are not included in the conf/postfix-files: BDAT_README MAILLOG_README POSTSCREEN_3_5_README SMTPUTF8_README Is it intended? Yikes, these are all "new" files added with Postfix 3.x. I'll

Re: Some README files are not included in the postfix-files

2022-01-20 Thread tobster
> Appreciated for decades, literally. Dank U zeer. For me just decade not decades ;-) but also from my side: dankä Dir villmol Wietse Also thanks a lot to all that help here on list and all who commit code to that masterpiece of SMTP software Cheers and have a good one tobi On Fri, 2022-01-21

Re: GhettoForge Postfix3

2022-01-20 Thread Peter
On 19/01/22 7:44 am, post...@ptld.com wrote: GhettoForge has a repo for Postfix3, it is not clear to me if Postfix3 is another beast entirely or if it is just a normal Postfix version 3 and higher. Can someone explain what is the purpose of "Postfix3"? It's just the latest version of

Should that behaviour be like this?

2022-01-20 Thread tobster
Today we stumbled over a postfix behaviour that was quite unexpected for us. we had in main.cf smtpd_client_restrictions = check_helo_access pcre:/etc/postfix/helo_access.pcre,regexp:/etc/postfix/helo_access.rege x so 2 access maps for helo but in "wrong" restriction. Postfix evaluated

Re: Should that behaviour be like this?

2022-01-20 Thread Wietse Venema
tobs...@brain-force.ch: > Today we stumbled over a postfix behaviour that was quite unexpected > for us. > > we had in main.cf > > > smtpd_client_restrictions = >check_helo_access > pcre:/etc/postfix/helo_access.pcre,regexp:/etc/postfix/helo_access.rege Commas and spaces are treated

Re: SASL questions

2022-01-20 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:22:40PM -0500, Joe Acquisto-j4 > > wrote: > >> . . . >> > I would imagine that Postfix can only authenticate to >> > servers that have entries in /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd. >> > >> > smtp_sasl_password_maps (default: empty) >> > >> > Optional Postfix SMTP