> i am running Postfix 3.4.14 and try to set up mailrouting to multiple
> smtp hosts.
> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/mailertable
>
> example.com smtp:[mx1.foobar.com],smtp:[mx2.foobar.com]
>
> However i get:
> fatal: garbage after "]" in server description:
>
Hello,
i am running 3.4.14 smoothly. However, after adding a virtual ip and
some mailrouting (migration from an old sendmail host) i have the
problem, that if i add "reject_unverified_recipient":
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
reject_unknown_recipient_domain
> postfix/submission/smtpd[23263]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[21.193.143.55]: 450 4.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
> unverified address: unknown mail transport error; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
The verification fails with a "unknown mail transport error"
Check the logs (on both
Reviving my a bit old question.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
RFC 8601 section 5. requires deleting Authentication-Results headers from
incoming messages. This should be done at trusted border, so when receiving
message via SMTP from clients or the world, except MX gateways or
On 19/02/24 14:00, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:23:32PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Over 25 years, Postfix has accumulated some features that
are essentially obsolete.
A quick status update.
First,
On 21/02/24 12:40, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Peter via Postfix-users:
A quick status update.
First, several features have been logging warnings that they would
be removed for 10 years or more, so we could delete them in good
conscience (perhaps keeping the warning with the
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 06:02:22PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> - You'd better add $$ at the end of the pattern, to anchor the regular
> expression.
Actually, that hostname is typically followed by additional data
separated by whitespace or a ';'.
> header_checks = pcre:{
Peter via Postfix-users:
> > A quick status update.
> >
> > First, several features have been logging warnings that they would
> > be removed for 10 years or more, so we could delete them in good
> > conscience (perhaps keeping the warning with the suggested alternative).
> > This change has not
On 2024-02-21 MRob via Postfix-users wrote:
[ off-topic ]
It never ceases to amaze me how people *know* that what they're posting
is off-topic, yet decide it's okay for them to post it anyway if they
just label it as off-topic. Hint: it's not.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Abstractions save us
Peter via Postfix-users:
> On 21/02/24 12:40, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Peter via Postfix-users:
> >>> A quick status update.
> >>>
> >>> First, several features have been logging warnings that they would
> >>> be removed for 10 years or more, so we could delete them in good
> >>>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> I guess the inline code available since 3.7 supports this:
>
> header_checks = regexp:{ {/^Authentication-Results: $myhostname/ IGNORE} }
>
> This would only remove problem headers and exempt MX backups.
>
> >If it helps, header_checks happen before
Hello- Im looking for <= $6/mo VPS suggestions for general mail/web
hosting server. Some super-cheap hosts pre-install O/S and give root but
I want to install O/S myself so can put in FDE. Hard to see which hosts
can do this.
I tried Linode before and yes, could get FDE
($5 1GB, 1CPU, 25GB,
12 matches
Mail list logo
