You need to turn on TLS to encrypt you connection and ask again.
Cheers,
Ken
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 05:21:13PM -0500, postmas...@klam.ca wrote:
> This may be a duplicate request, if so sorry but its been a bad day so
> far!
> I don't seem to be able to get SMTP Auth to work. I have read the
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:08:57AM -0500, Cory Coager wrote:
> We have a mainframe client sending emails with the body containing null
> characters. I found the message_strip_characters and
> message_reject_characters options could resolve this issue but I'm
> wondering if 'message_strip_charac
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:50:26PM +0800, jan gestre wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > David Cottle:
> > [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I see this a lot in my mail.l
Use a policyd.
Cheers,
Ken
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 20:54 CEST,
> richard lucassen wrote:
>
> > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > can't find it. Anyone a hint?
>
> Limiting in what sen
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:59:58PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:57:44PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> > > > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > > > can't find it. Anyone a hint?
> &g
rsyslog can log directly to a database backend.
Cheers,
Ken
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:57:33PM +0530, Ashwin Muni wrote:
> Thanks Luigi for the reply can you please tell me how to parse rsyslog
> to get the desired results using pglogsumm.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:07
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:41:45PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Wietse Venema [2009.05.22.2010 +0200]:
> > > > Is it possiblew to instruct postfix to always deliver to a different
> > > > port when it tries to connect to a specific machine?
> > >
> > > iptables is not an option, si
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:02:32AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
> grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I am
> down to under 10 spams a day. Looking at my backend server which is
> exchange 2007, I fi
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:14:03PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
> Mark Goodge wrote:
>
> > > I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
> > > recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
> > > smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limi
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:23:50PM +, Mark Goodge wrote:
> richard lucassen wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
>> Mark Goodge wrote:
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
smtpd_recipient_overshoot_lim
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:00:32PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
> Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> [mlm]
>
> > I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
> > option that will allow you to prevent col
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:40:29PM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Well, it looks like, perhaps, I found the missing link. After adding
> s25r rules and HELO response verification in main.cf, no spam has
> siped through.
>
> I think that mostly it was HELO response verification that did it.
> BTW,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:34:35AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Mikael Bak put forth on 1/22/2010 7:50 AM:
> > Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries.
> >
> > Stan,
> > Do you have a good enough reason to not run your own name resolver on
> > you
Can you use a pcre/regex map instead?
Ken
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:53:37PM -0400, Ryan Suarez wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 3/17/2010 3:35 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain header
>>> is present.
>>>
>>> Eg. Mail to
What about setting a second instance up to use for your
slow destinations. Then you can route to that instance from
your production instance and keep those messages from
impacting the faster sites.
Cheers,
Ken
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:58:42PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a some
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:34:56PM +0200, Josep M. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> One spammer has tried about 300 times send me email, always from the
> same address, but from about 20 different IP . Never pass verify sender,
> always get 450 errormy question is...when one email fail postfix
> verify_se
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:41:40PM +, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running my postfix with 3 mail filters and 2 content filters (actually
> one of the content filter (amavisd) is piping it's output to the other).
>
> My question here is how can I make sure to make my setup robust
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 01:53:37PM +, Charles Account wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We have a situation where LDAP query is resulting in a LDAP 80 level
> errorduring a domain lookup. Yes I understand we need to fix this problem.
> However, the side effect we see is the client's SMTP session hangs. Over
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:50:05PM +, Trier, James wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm standing up Postfix to intercept inbound email to a particular domain.
> What I'd like to do is take the inbound emails that reach this Postfix host,
> regardless of its final destination address, and place them on the f
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:03:12AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-05-19 6:33 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Then just delete the 20K messages from the queue using postsuper
> > within a script and reset the password on the compromised account.
>
> He wasn't asking how to delete the queued me
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:48:53PM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2010 13:30:44 Curtis Maurand wrote:
> > currently I have in my smtpd_client_restrictions: ...
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
> > permit
> >
> > Is flat out rejecting client
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0200, Mikael Bak wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> [big snip]
> >> So you have made your point. You prefer (or are required) to have user in
> >> control.
> >>
> > Yes. The big problem is that no solution out there is 100% accurate for all
> > users. So the only way to ma
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:06:11PM +0200, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:09:54 -0500
> > Von: Kenneth Marshall
> > An: Mikael Bak
> > CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:23:13PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> what's the deal w/ no configure script?
>
> you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right?
> they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm so sick of
> that.
>
> if i supply a configure script, wil
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> On 8/4/2010 1:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>> what's the deal w/ no configure script?
>>
>> you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right?
>> they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm s
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:50:36PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> > On 8/4/2010 1:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >> what's the deal w/ no configure script?
> >>
> >> you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to insta
It might be worth checking out the pre_prepare module:
http://preprepare.projects.postgresql.org/README.html
Cheers,
Ken
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:45:17PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 08:40 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> Jeroen,
>>
>> thanks for the detailed answer. Please re
I think you need to define an alias-owner for each alias that
needs the members to be tracked individually, like a mailing
list. Otherwise, some batching of addresses is used with the
observed results.
Cheers,
Ken
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:37:15PM -0300, Mariel Sebedio wrote:
> Here is a better
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:00:43PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> [ top-posting fixed, please don't do that ]
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:34:50PM -0700, Jeff Orrok wrote:
> > On 3/1/2011 4:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >See:
> > >http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot
> > >
> > >and pl
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:15:41PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Ignacio Garcia wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Hi there. We use both postgrey and policyd-weight to block spam.
>> policyd-weight checks against several RBL and DNSBL so each time a mail
>> is receive
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:50:19AM -0400, Etienne Simard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I must have been searching at the wrong place or using the wrong
> keywords as I have been trying to find how to correctly transport to a
> particular smtp relay or have postfix do a MX query based on the "from"
> address fi
Hi Preston,
Your delivery looks normal. You need to logs from the other
end of the connection that is re-trying the message incorrectly.
Maybe they are not seeing the final response do to a firewall
issue or your delivery is part of a group that is retried because
someone else's delivery in the gr
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 03:26:07PM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Eric B. wrote:
> >
> > Is there no way to direct Postfix to a different DNS server (as opposed to
> > the ones specified in resolve.conf) either for a particular domain, or for
> > all domains altogether?
> >
>
> No, that's outsi
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 02:19:34AM +0300, devel anaconda wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix
> 2.5.9.
> This server serves only smtp traffic. The only t
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:03:13PM -0800, Corey Chandler wrote:
> Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>>
>> Your system is not a high-performance server I/O-wise. Your two disks can
>> only
>> handle 200-300 fsync's to disk per second and postfix will always sync
>> you
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:42:30PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Len Conrad:
> > postconf -n | egrep postscreen
> >
> > postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
> > postscreen_blacklist_networks =
> > mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-mta_clients_b.cf
> ...
> > postscreen_whitelist_networks = $mynetwo
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:44:37PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> I've been reading through
> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html and Googling in
> an attempt to figure out how to allow "tagging" of email accounts for
> SPAM fighting purposes (mail to bob+any...@server.com gets deli
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 04:30:17PM +0200, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We already know it is not Postix's fault, as the reason lies at the
> network level, but I'm writing to the list in the hope that someone
> might have seen this behaviour, as I
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:58:52PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Johan Andersson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We are thinking to implement some form of greylisting at one of our sites
>> and wonder which one of the many flavors out there
>> that this group have found reliable?
>> I know postfix has its builting one f
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:44:25PM +0200, Johan Andersson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are thinking to implement some form of greylisting at one of our sites
> and wonder which one of the many flavors out there
> that this group have found reliable?
>
> I know postfix has its builting one from a while back
There is/was a piece of software written by the author
of the DSPAM program called RABL with a server and a
client piece. I think that it would do what you need.
Ken
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:12:41AM -0400, Joey wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
> Does anyone have a good reference of how to create my ow
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:25:25PM -0400, Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've done some searching of the list archives and the web, but I
> can't lay hands on an answer to this question:
>
> - is there a way, ideally documented in a HOWTO or guide, to
> configure PostFix such th
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:06:46PM -0300, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
> Dear, thanksis it possible that the STARTTLS settings slow down mail
> processing? In this mail relay server, the connections as "client" to the
> corporate mail server are always encrypted with the TLS, with the
> corres
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:55:46PM -0300, Roberto Carna wrote:
> So should we use this setting for TLS options in main.cf in order to
> slow down the key generation time:
>
> tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
>
> ???
>
>
> Thanks again.
Yes, that is what we use here.
Regards,
Ken
44 matches
Mail list logo
