development in Postfix by now and is there now a
better way of allowing some specific users to receive higher size mails?
-ANANT.
] while performing the EHLO
handshake)
-
Regards,
ANANT.
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of
Run, sendmail -q
Regards,
ANANT.
Quoting Patric Falinder :
Hi,
I'm not really sure if this has to do with Postifx so just tell me
if I'm wrong.
Is it possible to resend emails that are in a Maildir already?
The reason for this is that a user changed server so I had to ch
Yes, We have a CISCO PIX in between.
Regards,
ANANT.
Quoting Wietse Venema :
an...@isac.gov.in:
Dear List,
One of the mail sent to mail.bhelrnd.co.in is not getting delivered at
all. The following is the log extract. Do I need to set anything in
our Postfix mailer to solve this issue
ow PIX
Regards,
ANANT.
Quoting an...@isac.gov.in:
Yes, We have a CISCO PIX in between.
Regards,
ANANT.
Quoting Wietse Venema :
an...@isac.gov.in:
Dear List,
One of the mail sent to mail.bhelrnd.co.in is not getting delivered at
all. The following is the log extract. Do I need to set anything
than 2 Mb, postfix can detect it. Can it
redirect to some administrator for approval? If say, approved, by
mail itself, then it can proceed with delivery to recipient?
Any other ideas are also welcome...
Regards,
Anant
of a mail?
Regards,
Anant.
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any
mails. How does that mail be allowed without even looking at
policy (exception for policy).
Please provide guidance or any other alternative strategy to achieve
the requirement. But, it is must that, mail should go through the
virus scan.
Regards,
Anant.
- End message from Noel
policy (exception for policy).
Please provide guidance or any other alternative strategy to achieve
the requirement. But, it is must that, mail should go through the
virus scan.
Regards,
Anant.
Have D submit mail to a dedicated amavisd port on B, which can then
submit to a separate port on C w
ve
the requirement. But, it is must that, mail should go through the
virus scan.
Regards,
Anant.
Have D submit mail to a dedicated amavisd port on B, which can then
submit to a separate port on C with no policy.
See amavisd docs about listening on multiple ports, policy banks, etc.
For the p
ut, it is must that, mail should go through the
virus scan.
Regards,
Anant.
Have D submit mail to a dedicated amavisd port on B, which can then
submit to a separate port on C with no policy.
See amavisd docs about listening on multiple ports, policy banks,
etc.
For the postfix changes on C, th
,
Anant.
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use
cy for sending
outside mails. How does that mail be allowed without even looking
at policy (exception for policy).
Please provide guidance or any other alternative strategy to
achieve
the requirement. But, it is must that, mail should go through the
virus scan.
Regards,
Anant.
Have D submit mai
activated.
Even I tried to change the order of header_checks, same result.
Basically what I want is, if header X-ABC matches, it should deliver
the mail within the same postfix instance, and if it does not match,
it should relay to a.b.c.d
Where I am going wrong?
Regards,
Anant
on
multiple ports and setup a policy bank.
This has solved my problem.
Thanks to these wonderful solutions of Postfix, Amavisd-new, ClamAV
and SPAMAssassin and many more.
Regards,
Anant.
- Message from Wietse Venema -
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:13:09 -0400 (EDT)
From
?
Anant
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=none, delay=2351, delays=2351/0.06/0/0.05, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred (mail transport unavailable)
Waiting for info.
Regards,
ANANT.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Thanks. I had added one transport which I had forgotten to add in
master.cf (braindead).
Regards,
ANANT.
Quoting "Duane Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear List,
I am getting mail transport unavailable for one specific domain
REPLACE Option.
Before I try out, wanted to known all available options to choose from.
Anant S Athavale
--
IMPORTANT NOTE:
ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC) was renamed as U R Rao Satellite Centre (URSC).
Hence, the
instance
also. Is this allowed (being on the same system?).
Anant S Athavale
--
IMPORTANT NOTE:
ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC) was renamed as U R Rao Satellite Centre (URSC).
Hence, the existing domain (isac.gov.in) is changed to
eed to add any specific parameter with make makefiles which may solve
this issue?
Please suggest.
Anant S Athavale
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of th
1
Should I try older version of Postfix?
Anant S Athavale
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
l: aix
gcc version 6.2.0 (GCC)
but, still getting stuck @ same error.
collect2: fatal error: ../../lib/libglobal.a: not a COFF file
compilation terminated.
make: *** [master] Error 1
make: *** [update] Error 1
Should I try older version of Postfix?
Anant
retried
for few more days for delivery?
Is setting delay_warning_time the correct solution?
Regards,
anant.
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended
the bounce(5)
manpage.
Wietse
- End message from wie...@porcupine.org -
Thank you very much.
anant.
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the
receive back the mail posted to a mailing list.
But, due to SPF policy set for sender domain, mail is rejected.
Now, is there a way to overcome this using Postfix? As majordomo is a
very old software, it may be difficult to get any solution from
Majordomo. Please suggest.
Anant S Athavale
m discussing this in postfix group.
Regards,
ANANT.
- Message from Benny Pedersen -
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 13:42:25 +0100
From: Benny Pedersen
Subject: Re: SPF, Postfix and majordomo
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
an...@isac.gov.in skrev den 2017-03-02 13:38:
Now, is the
Hi,
I think, this may be due to my misconfiguration of mailing list
created using majordomo. I will try to resolve. I am sure,
postfix-users mailing list is not breaking SPF. But, my mailing list
using majordomo is breaking it.
regards,
anant.
- Message from Benny Pedersen
Hi,
to make things clear, I am running majordomo in my setup and I am
facing some SPF related issues in my setup and hence wanted to know,
how it is not happening with postfix-users which is also based on
Majordomo?
Regards,
anant.
- Message from an...@isac.gov.in -
Date: Thu
the relay host was slow.
I am not sure, whether this understanding is correct.
What is the correct way to come out of this situation and deliver the
mails faster after recovery of relay host.
Waiting for your valuable suggestions.
Anant S Athavale
alysis for further improving our setup.
Regadrs,
ANANT.
- End message from Viktor Dukhovni -----
Anant S Athavale
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of th
figuration that, smtp_pix_workaround_delay_time is 10s. Could PIX
be a factor in delivery latency?
I don't see 10s delay during normal operations, but I do see "enabling
PIX workarounds: disable_esmtp delay_dotcrlf for" lines in the logs
for the relay in question.
Do you think, PIX could be the reas
Dear List,
Lot of SPAM mails are being received where from and to address is
myself and the mail has contents which are dirty/bad.
The original sender id will be different.
How to handle such mails.
--
Anant S Athavale
We have implemented SPF check but not DMARC. It is passing SPF check also.
regards,
anant.
- Message from Michael -
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 07:10:50 -0500
From: Michael
Subject: Re: How to reject mails where from address and to address is myself.
To: postfix-users
nnection black ip
200.1.12.1
Regards,
anant.
- Message from Michael -
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 07:10:50 -0500
From: Michael
Subject: Re: How to reject mails where from address and to address is myself.
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Your email filter should be able to quaranti
to the same user.
What's the best way that, the user receives only one mail, when both
domains are in To addresses?
--
Anant S Athavale
--
IMPORTANT NOTE:
ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC) was renamed as U
n use any supported type.
Wietse
- End message from Wietse Venema -
Thank you.
Anant S Athavale
--
IMPORTANT NOTE:
ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC) was renamed as U R Rao Satellite Centre (URSC).
Hence
t, if both these domains are listed in the same mail, only one
mail should be received.
Hope this clarifies my requirement.
Anant S Athavale
--
IMPORTANT NOTE:
ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC) was renamed as U R Rao Satellite C
Dear List:
We have got one Ironport appliance for evaluation. It does reputation based
filtering and drops lots of mails. But, we are still running Postfix with
SpamAssassin for Anti-SPAM.
Can Postfix can be integrated with something for reputation based filtering?
Anant Athavale
.30.40 and reject all others.
Please let me know.
Regards,
anant athavale
s (if it is OK).
Please let me know a practical solution to my problem.
Regards,
Anant Athavale
Dear Wietse,
Thanks for the inputs. Will adhere to your suggestions.
Regards,
ANANT.
Quoting Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anant Athavale:
Dear List,
I have a basic question. Which is parameter I need to use to change
in order to change the mailq refresh time.
I have the fol
reachable (we assume). How do I debug to prove that, at that point
of delivery, lower priority MX record server is not reachable or
unable to deliver to lower priority MX record server?
Anant S Athavale
--
Confidentiality Notice
days for those in hold queue?
--
Anant S Athavale
--
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged
o use "postsuper -r" (not "postfix -r").
--
Viktor.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.orgTo
unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
- End message from Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-u
cc
a...@xx.coma...@xx.com
d...@xx.comd...@xx.com
Whether the above configuration will enable to get desired results?
ie. always_bcc should not work for a...@xx.com and d...@xx.com and
instead the mails are delivered to a...@xx.com and d...@xx.com only.
--
Anant S Ath
@postfix.org
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:24:15AM +0530, anant--- via Postfix-users wrote:
For specific 2 recipients of our domain, we don't want always_bcc to be
implemented. ie. if a mail is addressed to a...@xx.com (our domain only),
mail should not be Bcc to zz...@xx.com. similarly if mail recipie
47 matches
Mail list logo
