agree
Calle
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 18:07, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> +1 paul
>
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 9:22 PM Regina Obe wrote:
>
>> PostgreSQL 9.6 has reached EOL so I don't think there is any point in
>> supporting it in PostGIS 3.3.
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
>>
>>
>>
+1 paul
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 9:22 PM Regina Obe wrote:
> PostgreSQL 9.6 has reached EOL so I don't think there is any point in
> supporting it in PostGIS 3.3.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
>
>
> PostgreSQL 10 will be EOL'd before or very close to our planned 3.3 release
+1 Darafei.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 8:22 AM Regina Obe wrote:
> PostgreSQL 9.6 has reached EOL so I don't think there is any point in
> supporting it in PostGIS 3.3.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
>
>
> PostgreSQL 10 will be EOL'd before or very close to our planned 3.3
PostgreSQL 9.6 has reached EOL so I don't think there is any point in
supporting it in PostGIS 3.3.
https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
PostgreSQL 10 will be EOL'd before or very close to our planned 3.3 release
so we should get rid of that too.
There is not much savings with only