Steve Bennett-3 wrote:
Anyway think the element names could be refined slightly. Are there
any other tags that work this way, apart from the lifecycle ones? Do
different tags have different lifecycles (I seem to recall that
railways have more states). Should I just hard-code it all?
I
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
My first thought is to just have another couple of highway types ( a
proposed highway and a highway under construction ) with a list of
Andy Allan wrote:
Pretty unnecessary, imo. I think you're misunderstanding the
current purpose of the simple tab - providing a simple UI for
the majority of the mapping. Proposed buildings is pretty niche,
and should be incorporated in a way becoming of its niche-ness.
+1.
(Are we
Actually, what I forgot to say was...
Potlatch, 1 or 2, has always been a 90-10 editor. Make the
90% of mapping easy, and the 10% possible.
...and with P2, we can now make it both a 90-10 editor and a 99-1 editor.
That's why we have user-selectable stylesheets, and in particular the
No, it won't, for reasons already explained by Nop. Moreover the
current system has the distinct advantage that it can be used to
describe what's on the ground - a stroke of a pen on a planner's chart
I disagree, but as this is a distraction from the actual discussion at
hand, I'll leave it.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I'm also a little aware (having optimised the CategorySelector stuff
yesterday)
Btw - awesome. :)
Steve
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
