On 11/03/12 00:01, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
I would just delete them once they aren't needed anymore.
Delete them locally, you mean? Do you then need to push the deletion?
Well the two things actually separate.
You can delete a local branch wi
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> I would just delete them once they aren't needed anymore.
Delete them locally, you mean? Do you then need to push the deletion?
Steve
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
htt
On 10/03/12 03:08, Steve Bennett wrote:
One thing I'm not sure about in this whole approach is what you're
supposed to do with the zillions of branches you end up creating.
Assuming that the pull requests all get accepted, am I then supposed
to delete or archive these old branches? Seems like ev
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> My Git-fu is gradually improving to the point where I think I can
> probably decompose them. I'll try and cherry pick them apart and
> resubmit as individual pull requests.
Ok, done. For general education, here's what I did:
1) git pull syst
On 5 March 2012 04:01, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> "undo on creating way" fix,
>
> Definitely worthy of review - it's totally possible that I broke
> something else. Anyone else want to have a look at it? I guess we
> don't have any tests?
We don't have any tests that cover starting drawing a new wa
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Today's commit log is at:
> https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/commits/master
Thanks for the update. It's nice to get acknowledgement of our work,
even if it's not merged yet.
> I've not yet merged in Steve's highway=proposed/constru
Current most obvious bug that I can see is that (in en-GB at least) the
dreaded "[object Object]" is back on the GPS menu.
Oh, and landuse=cemetery renders as a black opaque area. Appropriate I
guess but probably not great for editing. :)
cheers
Richard
_
