RE: [Pound Mailing List] URGENT HELP NEEDED

2008-11-05 Thread Jacob Anderson
I think your inbound to pound connection is working okay. It's your pound-back_end that is failing. In the jail, you need to allow the pound server to connect outbound to your inside network. So you have: USER - { jail [pound] } | |-- back_end The USER - { jail

[Pound Mailing List] Request: add client IP to e500 error log message

2009-01-23 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello, Can you please add the client IP to the error log when any internal pound errors, e.g. e500, are generated? The current message looks something like: Jan 23 09:11:31 pound: (9d6ec003) e500 response error read from (BE IP ADDR)/POST /mypath HTTP/1.1: Connection timed out (59.992

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Request: add client IP to e500 error log message

2009-03-25 Thread Jacob Anderson
To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Request: add client IP to e500 error log message On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:25 -0800, Jacob Anderson wrote: Hello, Can you please add the client IP to the error log when any internal pound errors, e.g. e500, are generated

RE: Pound is Slowing Down My Site [Pound Mailing List]

2009-04-30 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello, When in doubt, you should always use tail -f on the log files: 1. tail -f /var/log/messages and watch the pound traffic 2. tail -f /var/log/httpd/blah.log and watch your back end traffic If pound is the culprit, then you will see a quick connection in #1 and a slow connection in #2. Of

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Axis IP Cameras

2009-05-22 Thread Jacob Anderson
Jeff, Do the cameras send video packets using UDP? Since the camera connection from Lynx says that it needs Java, I am thinking that it delivers a java applet, and then starts a UDP feed on the camera to send back to the java applet, which then displays UDP video packets. That's a very common LAN

[Pound Mailing List] undefined reference to rpl_malloc

2009-06-19 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello, I am trying to build pound 2.4.4 against PCRE and google-perftools. (a) installed PCRE using yum install pcre-devel (b) downloaded, extracted, and built the google-perftools from the google code site. Using version 1.3. No problems here. (c) added /usr/local/lib to the ld.so.conf just

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound website down?

2010-01-25 Thread Jacob Anderson
San Diego, CA - had one failure, and then persistent success. Likely intermittent DNS failure in the US. -Original Message- From: Albert [mailto:po...@alacra.com] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 11:23 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound website down? I've been

[Pound Mailing List] rpl_malloc

2010-02-02 Thread Jacob Anderson
Software Solutions ( \ / ___ \ | Insurance * Entertainment * Defense * Government ) ) | | || - | __ (| | | || Jacob Anderson President | |__) ) |___| || j...@beyond-ordinary.com | www.beyond-ordinary.com

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Connection Timeouts

2010-03-16 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello David, First step - try direct routing with a static NAT rule to jump your users directly to one back end. If they timeout, then it's a back end issue. If it works great, then read on. Next, check your routing. The back end may have a firewall running that is not allowing the traffic on

RE: [Pound Mailing List] SSL and backend servers?

2010-04-05 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello Anne, You only need one SSL certificate for Pound with SSL. If you need to have SSL on your back end servers, then you need certificates for every IP ADDRESS that will be secured with SSL. Pound is intended to be an SSL terminator, so you really only need SSL on the pound server. -- Jake

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound - Help Backends and URL-Path

2010-05-26 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hi, You can only do this with a proxy rewrite, like mod_rewrite in Apache. Pound is only a pass-through reverse proxy. Either you do this on the front-end with Apache, or the back-end after Pound. -- Jake -Original Message- From: p...@gmx.de [mailto:p...@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, May

RE: [Pound Mailing List] SSL Weak Cipher Suites Supported

2010-09-02 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello, You don't disable, you just authorize which ciphers you want to offer to the client: Ciphers TLSv1+SSLv3 -- Jake -Original Message- From: alexus [mailto:ale...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:53 PM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: [Pound Mailing List] SSL Weak

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Ssl Version 2 (v2) Protocol Detection

2010-09-02 Thread Jacob Anderson
Try adding this to your ListenHTTPS config: Ciphers TLSv1+SSLv3 This worked for our PCI DSS compliance scan. Is that what you are doing? -- jake -Original Message- From: alexus [mailto:ale...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:52 PM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: [Pound

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Redirect HTTP to HTTPS

2010-12-20 Thread Jacob Anderson
My $0.02 worth here. I had a similar problem recently when I switched our network over to a routed network instead of drop-in. The DNS needed to change, but I didn't change it, so pound redirected all https back to http, no matter what. When I fixed the DNS (the pound machine had to resolve its

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound segfaults

2011-01-10 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hi, Do you have a core file? If you build pound with debug symbols and have a core file, then you can dbg the core file and see where it is segfaulting. Once you get that information, post it and someone will be able to better help you. What other libraries are you using? (pcre, tmalloc, etc.)

RE: [Pound Mailing List] pound with 7 servers

2011-03-31 Thread Jacob Anderson
If memory serves, the host header require is a regular expression. You need to escape the '.'. headrequire ^host:[\t ]*store\.compumedik\.com http://store.compumedik.com $ BackEnd Address192.168.3.32 Port80 End End service From: Adrian

RE: [Pound Mailing List] New problems arrising, cannot connect to web server...

2011-06-30 Thread Jacob Anderson
Test #1: telnet 192.168.1.5 80 (from the pound machine) If this fails, then you have a firewall rule blocking port 80 outbound traffic, or you have a port 80 inbound block on 192.168.1.5. Pound often times must reside on both an external and internal network. The next test is to see

RE: [Pound Mailing List] pound w/ HTTPS to Apache backend redirects to HTTP

2011-07-25 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hall, If you ONLY have an HTTPS directive in your config, and you are being redirected back to http, then it sounds like you are (a) testing from your LAN, and (b) your BE is sending a redirect that is LAN addressed instead of pound addressed. Make sure that your application always

RE: [Pound Mailing List] pound w/ HTTPS to Apache backend redirects to HTTP

2011-07-25 Thread Jacob Anderson
BE Apache setup with usecanonicalname no, so it should be using whatever is passed in the URL. Unfortunately I don't have that much control over the application, it's a big box ERP system. DNS appears to be sound. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jacob Anderson j...@beyond-ordinary.com wrote: Hall

RE: [Pound Mailing List] pound crash and emergency config ignored

2011-09-09 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello Patrizio, What about removing HAProxy from the mix? The log looks like pound is telling you that it can not connect back to HAProxy: [Sep 9 12:08:15 bil1] pound: (4332a940) connect_nb: error after getsockopt: Connection refused [Sep 9 12:08:15 bil1] pound: (4332a940) backend

RE: [Pound Mailing List] detailed stats through command-line

2011-12-15 Thread Jacob Anderson
Change the logging option to be verbose, then: %grep [pound] /var/log/messages pound.log %webalizer pound.log J Set this up as a nightly logrotate post-processing step and viola'! From: Tom S [mailto:tsz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 7:17 AM To: pound@apsis.ch

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Upload problem through Pound

2011-12-16 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello, The FIN/ACK is a TCP stack related issue, not pound. Do you have the most recent patches and such for your host server? I’ve seen this same behavior for a variety of hosts, not just Windows clients. Plus, I’ve seen this on CentOS 4 and CentOS 5, and so far no relief in the way of

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7

2011-12-30 Thread Jacob Anderson
Sorry to chime in here on this topic, but this really isn’t a pound function. If you are losing your session data because pound bounces your client to another BE, then you need a shared session state machine for your back ends. We do this in ASP.NET with the session state server and it works

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7

2011-12-30 Thread Jacob Anderson
+1 on the cluster/macro idea. Yeah, that's a really good 2.7 idea. I could really use that and get rid of my m4 templates. -- jake -Original Message- From: Todd Freeman [mailto:free...@andrews.edu] Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 8:35 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: Re: [Pound

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7 (FR27: Misc new features)

2011-12-30 Thread Jacob Anderson
Joe's items #1, #3, and #5 would benefit me. +1 for each. -- jake -Original Message- From: Joe Gooch [mailto:mrwiz...@k12system.com] Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 9:47 AM To: 'pound@apsis.ch' Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7 (FR27: Misc new features) I have a bunch

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Wildcard Certificate and 302 redirect

2012-05-17 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hello, For my take, and my experience only, I’ve had this occur when I did not have the DNS setup properly. In my case, I was not setting the sd1.example.com and sd2.example.com domains back to the local IP addresses. When this was the case, pound would not redirect correctly and our login

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Questions

2013-02-22 Thread jacob anderson
I’ll bite. So Peter, can you just rebind your web application “/html” to the root of your web server? That would get rid of “/html” and you won’t have to change your pound configuration or add Varnish in there. You’re not really URL rewriting per-se. You’re just rebinding the web application to

RE: [Pound Mailing List] PCI-DSS Compliance with Pound

2013-04-29 Thread jacob anderson
Wow, thanks Joe! Keeping 2.6 alive for us xenophobic IT administrators is very helpful. :) -- Jake -Original Message- From: Joe Gooch [mailto:mrwiz...@k12system.com] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 7:40 AM To: 'pound@apsis.ch' Cc: 'Lubomir Rintel' Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List]

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Re: NULL: get_thr_arg spamming my syslog

2013-08-28 Thread jacob anderson
: jacob anderson [mailto:j...@beyond-ordinary.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 2:44 PM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Re: NULL: get_thr_arg spamming my syslog I like to refer to IBM's docs on pthreads when looking up this stuff: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com

[Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.6 on CentOS 5 2.6.18

2013-10-31 Thread jacob anderson
Software Solutions ( \ / ___ \ | Insurance * Entertainment * Defense * Government ) ) | | || -- | __ (| | | || Jacob Anderson President | |__) ) |___| || j...@beyond-ordinary.com | www.beyond-ordinary.com

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.6 on CentOS 5 2.6.18

2013-10-31 Thread jacob anderson
Yeah, I have not updated the box - it's been very stable for 3 years. I opted to just replace all of it, hardware to OS, with current stuff. I wanted to upgrade to 2.6 b/c we had a webserver go down and 2.5 did not recognize it as down, so 50% of users were being directed to the dead node.

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Poodle Exploit

2014-10-15 Thread Jacob Anderson
Nick, Can you just build with openssl 0.9.8zc: OpenSSL 0.9.8 users should upgrade to 0.9.8zc. The advisory recommends using this version for 0.9.8 users (which is what we are too). http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20141015.txt -- jake From: Nick Rogers

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7 Hickups on OpenBSD 5.6

2015-04-09 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hi Most of the time when I see pound stutter during processing it is the result of DNS access/latency. Maybe there is some problems on your network with routing to the DNS servers? -- Jake From: Nino Fink, Contria GmbH [mailto:f...@contria.com] Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 9:01

[Pound Mailing List] Redirecting http to https from web application

2015-08-13 Thread Jacob Anderson
Hey Pounders, I have an ASP.NET application that redirects http connections to https using the old Response.Redirect(https://blah/foo) method. In Pound 2.5, this works fine and the client is properly redirected from http to https. I upgraded to Pound 2.7 (and 2.8), now when I try the

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Connection reset on non-SSL sites instead of presenting first SSL mentioned in configuration

2015-10-23 Thread Jacob Anderson
Freja, There's not much you can do here. SSL binds on the port explicitly and handles all traffic, unless you use the SSL name protocol (SNI). It sounds like you don't want that. So the "Head Require" in an HTTPS rule set is just perfunctory. It really has no control over connections. SSL

RE: [Pound Mailing List] syslog error messages

2015-12-09 Thread Jacob Anderson
These are the client breaking the connection. From: John Hayward [mailto:john.hayw...@wheaton.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 6:37 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: [Pound Mailing List] syslog error messages In syslog we are seeing the following types of errors: 1) Dec 9

RE: [Pound Mailing List] syslog error messages

2015-12-09 Thread Jacob Anderson
These are the client breaking the connection. From: John Hayward [mailto:john.hayw...@wheaton.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 6:37 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: [Pound Mailing List] syslog error messages In syslog we are seeing the following types of errors: 1) Dec 9

RE: [Pound Mailing List] 503 Service Unavailable: Back-end server is at capacity

2015-12-09 Thread Jacob Anderson
Pound tells you the server is overloaded because your back end is telling pound that it is overloaded. 10.5.4 503 Service Unavailable The server is currently unable to handle the request due to a temporary overloading or maintenance of the server. The implication is that this is a temporary

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Logging Ciphers being used

2016-06-15 Thread Jacob Anderson
It's sent to the back-end: X-SSL-cipher= TLSv1.2/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 TLSv1.2 Kx=ECDH Au=RSA Enc=AESGCM(128) Mac=AEAD -Original Message- From: Karl Rossing [mailto:karl.ross...@barobinson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 2:28 PM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: [Pound Mailing

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Blocking spambots

2016-03-01 Thread Jacob Anderson
You could just take the draconian route and block the bot's IP addresses using ipfw or iptables. That way you don't even take up resources in pound. Just dump them at the gate... -Original Message- From: Mike Slinn [mailto:msl...@micronauticsresearch.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Blocking spambots

2016-03-01 Thread Jacob Anderson
You could just take the draconian route and block the bot's IP addresses using ipfw or iptables. That way you don't even take up resources in pound. Just dump them at the gate... -Original Message- From: Mike Slinn [mailto:msl...@micronauticsresearch.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Blocking spambots

2016-03-01 Thread Jacob Anderson
Neither is blocking by user-agent. You can spoof a user-agent more easily than you can jump to a new IP. -Original Message- From: Mike Slinn [mailto:msl...@micronauticsresearch.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 11:24 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Blocking

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound Compiled with Openssl1.1

2018-01-04 Thread Jacob Anderson
What if you add the macro back into config.h: # define LHM_lh_new(type, name) \ ((LHASH_OF(type) *)lh_new(LHASH_HASH_FN(name), LHASH_COMP_FN(name))) Here's where it seems to have been removed: https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-commits/2016-January/002778.html seems to be equivalent