Bill Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to say, I also switched from PowerMail to Thunderbird last year,
because of the lack of support in PowerMail for imap (slow and
crash-prone) and html (extra keystrokes to read an ever-increasing
amount of mail). Thunderbird also seems to respond more
Michael Lewis told:
It means that no email client can be all things to all people.
Have anyone ever asked for that in an email application, I wonder. Being
reasonably flexible and useful does not mean being all things to all
people and as reasonably flexible is a quite attainable objective, I
see
Ken Pope said:
typing, sending, downloading, and
searching (not surprising given the FoxTrot engine) seemed faster.
I'd say that, on slower hardware, Powermail is slower except for
searching. Especially so with several email connections at the same
time, but also overall.
Mikael
Technoids:
PM
Jefferis Peterson said:
However, there is a very noticeable delay when typing in a new email while
PM is downloading new email
Actually, I thought that bug was gone. I haven't noticed it lately, but
it's possible I just have gotten used to it.
Mikael
Technoids:
PM 5.6.3 build 4504 sv /
Jeremy Hughes said:
Apart from the inconvenience of having to compact the database regularly
(it takes about 30 minutes to do this on my 2GHz iMac), another problem
with the monolithic file format is that incremental backups (Retrospect,
Time Machine, whatever) have to back up the entire database
Ulrik Larsen - Utopian. sa såhär:
Could there be a point in the preferences where this can be adjusted,
whether or not the user wants to forward text or original message?
Powermail doesn't author HTML-messages. As the (external) HTML-display
engine is not the same in 3.x and 5.x I think the same
On 6/15/08 7:06 AM, MB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, there is a very noticeable delay when typing in a new email while
PM is downloading new email
Actually, I thought that bug was gone. I haven't noticed it lately, but
it's possible I just have gotten used to it.
Machine Name:
More and more e-mail is in html format. Hardcore PowerMail users say
they don't want to be bothered with this mail, that most of it is spam
anyway, but that's not true in my community. When html mail arrives,
PowerMail wants you to make a choice... open your web browser to read
it, download
Bill Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When html mail arrives,
PowerMail wants you to make a choice... open your web browser to read
it, download the images, or read it as plain text (which sometimes turns
out to be a blank screen). Other mail programs assume you want to read
it, unless it's
Bill Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More and more e-mail is in html format. Hardcore PowerMail users say
they don't want to be bothered with this mail, that most of it is spam
anyway, but that's not true in my community. When html mail arrives,
PowerMail wants you to make a choice... open your
On Sunday, June 15, 2008, Kjell Olausson sent forth:
Bill Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More and more e-mail is in html format. Hardcore PowerMail users say
they don't want to be bothered with this mail, that most of it is spam
anyway, but that's not true in my community. When html mail
Tim Lapin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
While I too prefer plain text e-mail I agree that more and more
legitimate e-mail is now in HTML format. Unfortunately, PM doesn't
really know what to do with it. Such e-mail might be readable in plain
text but it also might result in a blank page.
If
The last time I looked at it, you couldn't just mix in your replies to
parts of a the received HTML mail. I'm no big fan of HTML mails
either, but there ARE occasions where it's nice to have the formatting
preserved.
Am 15.06.2008 um 17:11 schrieb Michael J. Hußmann:
Tim Lapin ([EMAIL
powermail-discuss Digest #2841 - Sunday, June 15, 2008
Re: Review of Power Mail
by Kjell Olausson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Review of Power Mail
by MB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: typing speed (was: Importing from Entourage 2004?)
by MB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: typing
Cotty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-6-12 12:16 PM said:
Well if it's any consolation, I am extremely happy with Powermail - been
using it for years (Claris Emailer before that) and I find it is stable,
does exactly what I need from an email application, without any
distractions and fancy footwork,
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
incremental backups (Retrospect, Time Machine, whatever)
have to back up the entire database each time it changes.
I'm sure you did not mean to include the word whatever.
The word whatever implies that ALL backup programs suffer this defficiency.
Richard Hart
In fact, SpamSieve works better with Thunderbird -- with PowerMail, I
remember having to reconfigure it every time I upgraded either program.
And it seemed to want to dump its corpus every once in a while.
However, I'm grateful to the folks at CTM for introducing me to
SpamSieve -- it was
17 matches
Mail list logo
