RE: [powernet] RE: The use of equivalent Primary Calibration Standard for sources

2017-12-06 Thread Roger Schanzenbach
John: By recollection, the San Onofre procedure required traceability to NIST or "major industrial nations". We did not keep a report on file for defense. Roger Schanzenbach, CHP From: Martinson, Tim [mailto:tim.martin...@flukebiomedical.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 1:00

[powernet] RE: The use of equivalent Primary Calibration Standard for sources

2017-12-05 Thread Martinson, Tim
Hello John, Regarding equivalency of calibration standards; NIST, the German PTB and many other nations standards institutes are signatories to the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA). This includes radiation standards. You can go to the CIPM website:

[powernet] RE: The use of equivalent Primary Calibration Standard for sources

2017-12-05 Thread Holmes, Stephen J:(GenCo-Nuc)
Our procedures specifically call out "NIST" with no allowance for other standards organizations Stephen J Holmes, CHP Rad Prot Tech Support Manager stephen.hol...@exeloncorp.com 315-791-3577 | 845-476-0796 (mobile) [cid:image004.png@01CFD817.5B92ABA0] R.E.