Re: [Powernet] Count Room Questions

We have a limit for the Tennelec which requires supervision approval for similar reasons mentioned by David Brehm below. This is to make sure a peer check is taken to minimize the chances that it would become contaminated. Michael Macho Radiation Protection Supervisor - Dosimetry Comanche Peak

[Powernet] Can I get added to the list?

Hello, Can I get added to the email distribution? I am assuming the role of Supervisor Radiological Analysis next week and I would like to receive these emails. Thank you, Erin M. Salling Senior Instructor - Radiological Protection Nuclear Training, North Anna Power Station (540) 894-2418

Re: [Powernet] [EXTERNAL] Efficiency Bulletin 17-21 Weekly Source Checks of Portable RP Instrumentation

Ken, We implemented bulletin at the beginning of 2018. All of our portable instruments (friskers, ion chambers, area monitors, etc), PCM's, TEM's and GEM5's went to weekly. We started tracking for performance issues once we went to the weekly source checks and have not seen noticeable

Re: [Powernet] FW: Benchmark question - HS posting

Look at the wording in the last revision of the ODCM, prior to implementing GL 89-01. Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc. 4350 Big Springs Road, Lebanon, TN 37090 615-453-3712 (Office) jim...@keysolutionsinc.com 413-403-9805 (e-Fax) From: Powernet On

Re: [Powernet] Count Room Questions

I’d be reluctant to put in a procedure hard limits. A guideline or documented expectation does seem prudent to ensure that someone does not do something that would result in an area posting change without some prior thought/planning. While rare (in my experience) it does happen that

[Powernet] Count Room Questions

Everyone, Do you have a Count Room limit that prohibits samples from entering for a: 1. Contamination level that is too high (i.e., >100,000 dpm/100cm2) 2. Radiation level that is too high (i.e., >5mr/hr) Thanks, Tony Pilo Duke Energy INPO Loanee Emergency Preparedness W: