[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-17 Thread Jeremy Teo
Hello, apologies for the delay. I have uploaded a working GRUB 2 + ppc multiboot and example program at http://polaris.blastwave.org/wiki/PolarisBootstrap (Thanks to Noah Yan for the original patch and help) On 2/15/06, Ben wrote: > Not to pester, but did you get that put up on polaris.blastw

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-16 Thread Cyril Plisko
Ladies and gents, I would like to ask everyone contributing to polaris.blastwave.org: please do not foorget to leave a comment summarizing your change tto wiki. RSS feed includes this comment and it helps those monitoring the site via RSS aggregator (me, for example). Regards, Cyril On

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 2/15/06, ken mays wrote: > Cyril, > > Ref: > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=5696&tstart=0 > {See Keith's comments} > > "See > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=2217&tstart=0. > There are at least three more pending changes that are > not yet > available

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 2/15/06, Ken Mays wrote: > 1. Have all of the GCC 3.4.3 patches been done in consistency to the Solaris > x86 Engineering requirements? I remember three fixes were needed for their > build of GCC 3.4.3. > I think that question is for me, so I try to answer. Ken, I am not sure what the Solar

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:36:22PM -0600, Noah yan wrote: > Here is the file. you can load it from network or fs, when let it go, It > should print out: "boot v9 boot interface" and then something like: default > catch code = xxx, SRR0=xx SRR1=xx > > let me know your results Ok, i will t

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:24:11PM -0600, Noah yan wrote: > Sven and Ken, > > Thanks for offering. I have been applying a developer ODW from bbrv for this > efforts of work and hope to get one soon so I can do this myself. Cool, but as i do firmware development, i still think there are some stuff

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:26:44AM -0600, Noah yan wrote: > On 2/15/06, Ken Mays wrote: > > > > 1. Have all of the GCC 3.4.3 patches been done in consistency to the > > Solaris x86 Engineering requirements? I remember three fixes were needed for > > their build of GCC 3.4.3. > > > > 2. SmartFirmwa

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:32:44AM -0800, Ken Mays wrote: > 1. Have all of the GCC 3.4.3 patches been done in consistency to the Solaris > x86 Engineering requirements? I remember three fixes were needed for their > build of GCC 3.4.3. > > 2. SmartFirmware update? I figured SmartFirmware could g

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 2/15/06, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:32:44AM -0800, Ken Mays wrote: > > 1. Have all of the GCC 3.4.3 patches been done in consistency to the > > Solaris x86 Engineering requirements? I remember three fixes were needed > > for their build of GCC 3.4.3. > > > > 2. SmartFirmw

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread ken mays
Cyril, Ref: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=5696&tstart=0 {See Keith's comments} "See http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=2217&tstart=0. There are at least three more pending changes that are not yet available on any branch (as far as I know, no one has actua

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Noah yan
Sven and Ken, Thanks for offering. I have been applying a developer ODW from bbrv for this efforts of work and hope to get one soon so I can do this myself. To make it fast, how about I send you the binay inetboot.elf (I need some time to clean the source and check in)? the smartfirmware should c

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Noah yan
On 2/15/06, Ken Mays wrote: > > 1. Have all of the GCC 3.4.3 patches been done in consistency to the > Solaris x86 Engineering requirements? I remember three fixes were needed for > their build of GCC 3.4.3. > > 2. SmartFirmware update? I figured SmartFirmware could get us rolling with > the prope

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread ken mays
If I can be provided with the latest Smartfirmware (beta or otherwise through private email (Sven)) and the code mentioned, then I can let you know some immediate results (if I don't end up with a 'brick'). Let me know if you have some specific procedures you (Noah) want me to follow for the appro

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-15 Thread Ken Mays
1. Have all of the GCC 3.4.3 patches been done in consistency to the Solaris x86 Engineering requirements? I remember three fixes were needed for their build of GCC 3.4.3. 2. SmartFirmware update? I figured SmartFirmware could get us rolling with the proper GRUB2 as well, yet something fell off

[powerpc-discuss] Re: Re: Status update

2006-02-14 Thread Ben
Not to pester, but did you get that put up on polaris.blastwave.org yet? I couldn't find it. -Ben This message posted from opensolaris.org