On 1 December 2015 at 23:36, Raoul Duke wrote:
> Yes, I sorta hope we all know & can understand that this is subjective
> stuff. Too sad it is rare that head hunters / career counselors /
> managers know that / expend the energy to figure it out. And
> furthermore it is always
Here is one:
What constitutes fun in programming? How do we define it and what are its
parameters (i.e. when is it no longer fun)?
Best,
Huw
On 1 December 2015 at 18:43, Huw Lloyd <huw.softdesi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Paola,
>
> I would suggest you turn that question on its he
Catherine and others,
The historical question may be more informative, in that this may help to
inform a unit of analysis that incorporates the needs of the student (e.g.
their intellectual development) into an understanding of how to construct
and deploy a curriculum.
However, for conventional
I'm not clear on the full shape of your problem, Linda. What will the
programs be used for, for instance? Are you using programming as a means
of analysing data?
Working through a more thorough description may help you, even if the
emails on this list do not.
Best,
Huw
On 6 April 2016 at
Hi Raoul,
No doubt it could be construed as either-or rather than both-and. Having
relevant media to support professional development is necessary. However,
it seems rather too easy to end up with a cultural reduction toward the
technological means rather than the ends (and thus we end up
Sorry for any upset.
One of the things I like about Paola's description (which requires work to
put here and which I regret "cutting off") is the appropriateness of her
comment "I didn’t know what was going on." This (I believe) addresses the
point of orientation, of discerning the units of the
; for our students. It is patently absurd.
>
> I could not let that pass unchallenged, but I will now leave this
> conversation, as it is not achieving anything constructive.
>
> Linda
>
> On 12 September 2017 at 19:02, Huw Lloyd <h...@bootstrapsystems.co.uk>
> wrote:
&
where teachers will be able to enter their criteria and target age groups,
> and access the reviews and experience of other teachers in using these
> systems. We hope that this will help teachers benefit from the experience
> of others, and choose hardware that meets their needs better, rath
This draft paper references additional material, however you might get the
gist of it without that basis:
https://www.academia.edu/42233036/A_Study_of_Active_Orientation_Part_1_A_Perspective_Based_Theory_of_Cognitive_Development
Best,
Huw
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:30 AM Chris A wrote:
> Hi