and ever will exist.
Steven
--
From: Richard O'Keefe
Sent: 29/03/2012 07:55
To: Steven Clarke
Cc: John Daughtry; Brad Myers; Raoul Duke; Ppig-Discuss-List
Subject: Re: studies of naming?
On 29/03/2012, at 3:39 AM, Steven Clarke wrote:
We don’t have the luxury
With respect to the UI portion...
Here is a paper by Myers and Rosson from 1992:
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=142789
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Raoul Duke rao...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
along the lines of a thought i've had of late why is there so much
*code*!?, i wonder if anybody
hates it so much that they
cannot make themselves be excited about it.
John Daughtry
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 19:47 +0100, Stasha Lauria wrote:
I fully agree on both:
1- Don't teach Java.
2- before learning
I would suggest taking a more holistic view of the design space. Rather than
asking which tool is best, you may be better served by seeking to
empirically describe and explain the underlying trade-offs. In what ways do
option1 help, hinder, and undermine learning? In what ways do option2 help,
Maybe it is time to rewrite K-12 math books to be in line with computational
processing.
It would be great. Imagine dad at the dining room table trying to explain to
little Johnny... 100 Cheerios are here, and if we add another, we have -100
Cheerios.
Sorry, I couldn't help myself.
With respect
Chris brings up an interesting point... the underlying strategy. I think the
strategic intension of the usage is more interesting than the pattern by
itself.
Take these strategies for example (off the top of my head):
1. Use static whenever a method doesn't access attributes
2. Use static
