On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, John Daughtry j...@daughtryhome.com wrote:
What are, say, the
three biggest open questions/challenges in visual languages? Is there a
meta-paper that perhaps discusses VL from such a high level?
On 10 March 2011 17:06, John Zabroski johnzabro...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, John Daughtry j...@daughtryhome.com wrote:
There is a lot of scattered research on visual languages... some more
directly studying visual languages than others. Some extant work is about
visual languages when the researcher doesn't even realize it (a colleagues
All,
There is a lot of scattered research on visual languages... some more
The best book I know of on visual language is:
Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art by Scott Mccloud
--
Derek M. Jones tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667
Knowledge Software Ltd
Corrections...
On 9 March 2011 10:37, alex a...@slab.org wrote:
Artists often say they like Max and PD because they are visual.
However you can put boxes where you like, it makes no difference
because visual layout in these languages is entirely secondary syntax.
I meant secondary notation
On 9 March 2011 13:31, Thomas Green green...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I wonder whether the way that spoken English sometimes uses pitch and stress
to emphasize particular parts of an utterance (No, it's MINE!) should be
seen through the same spectacles? Of course, 'real' linguists have their
terms
