Re: Re-Fox HELP!!!

2013-01-30 Thread Alan Bourke
Sure, sling it over here, but I suspect the time has passed by now! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: Re-Fox HELP!!!

2013-01-30 Thread Kurt @ VR-FX
UR guess is correct! On 1/30/2013 3:42 AM, Alan Bourke wrote: Sure, sling it over here, but I suspect the time has passed by now! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

Re: Re-Fox HELP!!!

2013-01-30 Thread desmond . lloyd
So did u guys get it done for your client? --Original Message-- From: Kurt @ VR-FX Sender: ProFox To: profox@leafe.com ReplyTo: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: Re-Fox HELP!!! Sent: Jan 30, 2013 5:10 AM UR guess is correct! On 1/30/2013 3:42 AM, Alan Bourke wrote: Sure, sling it over

RE: Re-Fox HELP!!!

2013-01-30 Thread Kurt
Yes - I knocked the sucker out of the ball park! The problem was - a data error was occurring when they were attempting to pack a shipment. But, the packing program claimed there was a Qty error - and it would NOT let them complete the packing process. After you sent me the Decompiled program -

Using LostFocus Instead of Valid

2013-01-30 Thread Gene Wirchenko
Dear ProFox'ers: My VFP app of over a decade uses Valid for validation. Because VFP does not allow two Valid methods on the call chain, I have had to not have control-level validation on nested forms. I would like to change this. I understand that some people have used LostFocus

Re: Using LostFocus Instead of Valid

2013-01-30 Thread Frank Cazabon
Hi Gene, to stop a control losing focus issue a NODEFAULT in the lostfocus. so you might have code like this: IF this.Value 0 NODEFAULT ENDIF I haven't done this in a long time so I may be inaccurate but that should at least set you on the right path Frank. Frank Cazabon On

Re: Using LostFocus Instead of Valid

2013-01-30 Thread Jean MAURICE
Hi Gene, The Valid method is here only to say I am allowed to leave the current object or not. As you have seen, you should not have another 'sequence' in it. Once Valid returns .T., the Lostfocus method is here to compute what to do when you leave the current object. I have never have

Re: Using LostFocus Instead of Valid

2013-01-30 Thread Gene Wirchenko
At 10:42 2013-01-30, Frank Cazabon frank.caza...@gmail.com wrote: to stop a control losing focus issue a NODEFAULT in the lostfocus. so you might have code like this: IF this.Value 0 NODEFAULT ENDIF I haven't done this in a long time so I may be inaccurate but that should at least set

Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8

2013-01-30 Thread Mike Copeland
Really? Why does that not surprise me... Mike Original Message Subject: Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8 From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com To: profoxt...@leafe.com Date: 1/30/2013 4:15 PM Was talking new tech with directors and found out we had a Surface. So I

Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8

2013-01-30 Thread Michael Oke, II
Because google hasn't written a version for that OS yet? Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote: Really? Why does that not surprise me... Mike

Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8

2013-01-30 Thread Stephen Russell
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote: Really? Why does that not surprise me... Mike --- Not even in the free apps? Go figure! The device has a nice feel and the keyboard is pretty slick as well. It is charging now. When I get home and get

Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8

2013-01-30 Thread Mike Copeland
Really? They're always pretty spry and on the ball from what I've seen. It's not like MSoft would surprise them with a new version of Windows. Original Message Subject: Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8 From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: profoxt...@leafe.com Date:

clear events Issue

2013-01-30 Thread Gene Wirchenko
Dear ProFox'ers: I have LostFocus validation working reasonably well now with a test form though I am sure that more complications will ensue. I have just found a weird behaviour of clear events. I thought I understood clear events. In my LostFocus, I start by checking if

Re: clear events Issue

2013-01-30 Thread Frank Cazabon
Gene, you should really only have one READ EVENTS (in your main program and nowhere else) and one CLEAR EVENTS in your application. You shouldn't have to use CLEAR EVENTS to close a form. It sounds like you want your exit button to act like a cancel button. Set the buttons Cancel property

Re: Using LostFocus Instead of Valid

2013-01-30 Thread Ken Dibble
Are there any other things that I have to watch for using this way of handling validation? (I am remembering now why I went with a button toolbar (to allow exiting a form when the current entry control has an invalid value), but there are probably other traps.) Toolbars and the