Sure, sling it over here, but I suspect the time has passed by now!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
UR guess is correct!
On 1/30/2013 3:42 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
Sure, sling it over here, but I suspect the time has passed by now!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
So did u guys get it done for your client?
--Original Message--
From: Kurt @ VR-FX
Sender: ProFox
To: profox@leafe.com
ReplyTo: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Re-Fox HELP!!!
Sent: Jan 30, 2013 5:10 AM
UR guess is correct!
On 1/30/2013 3:42 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
Sure, sling it over
Yes - I knocked the sucker out of the ball park!
The problem was - a data error was occurring when they were attempting to
pack a shipment. But, the packing program claimed there was a Qty error -
and it would NOT let them complete the packing process.
After you sent me the Decompiled program -
Dear ProFox'ers:
My VFP app of over a decade uses Valid for validation. Because
VFP does not allow two Valid methods on the call chain, I have had to
not have control-level validation on nested forms. I would like to
change this.
I understand that some people have used LostFocus
Hi Gene,
to stop a control losing focus issue a NODEFAULT in the lostfocus.
so you might have code like this:
IF this.Value 0
NODEFAULT
ENDIF
I haven't done this in a long time so I may be inaccurate but that
should at least set you on the right path
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
On
Hi Gene,
The Valid method is here only to say I am allowed to leave the current object
or not. As you have seen, you should not have another 'sequence' in it.
Once Valid returns .T., the Lostfocus method is here to compute what to do when
you leave the current object.
I have never have
At 10:42 2013-01-30, Frank Cazabon frank.caza...@gmail.com wrote:
to stop a control losing focus issue a NODEFAULT in the lostfocus.
so you might have code like this:
IF this.Value 0
NODEFAULT
ENDIF
I haven't done this in a long time so I may be inaccurate but that
should at least set
Really? Why does that not surprise me...
Mike
Original Message
Subject: Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8
From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Date: 1/30/2013 4:15 PM
Was talking new tech with directors and found out we had a Surface. So I
Because google hasn't written a version for that OS yet?
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:
Really? Why does that not surprise me...
Mike
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:
Really? Why does that not surprise me...
Mike
---
Not even in the free apps? Go figure!
The device has a nice feel and the keyboard is pretty slick as well.
It is charging now. When I get home and get
Really? They're always pretty spry and on the ball from what I've seen.
It's not like MSoft would surprise them with a new version of Windows.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [NF] Bitch and moan over Win8
From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Date:
Dear ProFox'ers:
I have LostFocus validation working reasonably well now with a
test form though I am sure that more complications will ensue.
I have just found a weird behaviour of clear events. I thought
I understood clear events.
In my LostFocus, I start by checking if
Gene,
you should really only have one READ EVENTS (in your main program and
nowhere else) and one CLEAR EVENTS in your application. You shouldn't
have to use CLEAR EVENTS to close a form.
It sounds like you want your exit button to act like a cancel button.
Set the buttons Cancel property
Are there any other things that I have to watch for using this way of
handling validation? (I am remembering now why I went with a button
toolbar (to allow exiting a form when the current entry control has an
invalid value), but there are probably other traps.)
Toolbars and the
15 matches
Mail list logo