Re: PACK AND ALL THAT

Jerry, correct, you are right. So just donot pack() and you are able to make your transaction reversible. Pack() and Zap() are for development only, they should not be used in production. To pack a temporary table ( cursor ) is completely overkill, just create a new cursor with the same name

Re: PACK AND ALL THAT

Another way is to reuse the deleted records. In few words : to delete a record, I transform the (integer) key value to the negative one (mykey = -ABS(mykey)). When I have a record to add, I lookfor the first record with a negative key. If FOUND() I replace the data and the key with the new

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

On 4 June 2015 at 18:57, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote: I understand the upgrade is free. But how much is the DOWNGRADE, if they launch yet another turkey like Vista? Win 8 was Vista II Know a few people

W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?

For years I've convinced that MSSoap Toolkit was indispensable on the server side for answering Soap requests, and lately I've been searching on the web about how to keep using existent web-services without it, replacing it with something else. Today I've uninstalled the soap toolkit from a

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

On 4 June 2015 at 16:56, Kurt Wendt kurt_we...@globetax.com wrote: I don't mind losing Hearts - but I sure hope Spider Solitaire is still there - as that's really the only occasional WinOS game I play. I just checked. It has Microsoft Solitaire Collection. -- Paul

Re: [NF] All OSs are malware

Yes, the NSA compiles it. I guess they just check it's properly coded and then compile it so that you may have better security. On 05/06/15 11:43, Alan Bourke wrote: All cryptographic code goes as source code to NSA and is returned as object code to be used by windows Does it? Source?

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

We just found out, in shipping out an update to one of our vertical apps, that 1024x768 is still too large for some, with old square 4x3 aspect ratios and poor eyesight. As long as human eyes are human eyes, that is never going to change either. Nor are people over 40 ever going to be able

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

What will you lose? The ability to interact with a SAMBA 3 Domain. That's gonna cost me. Although, MS swore up and down that they wouldn't allow it in Windows 7 either, and then customers complained in batchloads, so they added some registry hacks, and it works...also in Win 8.x and

Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?

I'm testing this, and found that when you configure COM+ to use Soap (I've using this article: http://www.kehm.de/henrik/blog/files/a5019da836d29c3cee972f5f62b5a8bd-19.html), then every time I replace the component on COM+ console (test_service.dll), a new dll is generated on a .net framework

Re: [NF] All OSs are malware

No, Ricardo, I believe when Alan said Source? he meant: Can you be provide a verifiable, legitimate citation to your claim that the NSA gets Microsoft's encryption source code and ships it back to them as object code? I'd be interested in reading that too. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 10:16 AM,

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Ken Dibble krdib...@stny.rr.com wrote: What will you lose? The ability to interact with a SAMBA 3 Domain. Well, that could be a problem. I've got legacy Linux servers deployed at client sites with older Samba servers, working fine for years. Looks like I'll

Re: [NF] All OSs are malware

Verifiable? LOL An MCP in the encryption area told me personally some 15 years ago (this is not hearsay), he had to send his source code and received executable code. He is top notch, I won't reveal his name. As for verifiable or legitimate you may believe my word or not, don't really care.

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

Ken, Just to be clear, are you saying Win10 won't connect to a Samba 3 server? Or is Win10-connectivity only a problem when a Samba 3 server is providing AD services? I've got MANY Linux boxes providing simple share of data files... If Win10 won't talk to them, that's huge for me. Thanks

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

Great! That's what I was hoping you said...just wanted to make sure. Thank you for clarifying the details. Mike Ken Dibble wrote: Just to be clear, are you saying Win10 won't connect to a Samba 3 server? Or is Win10-connectivity only a problem when a Samba 3 server is providing AD

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

Just to be clear, are you saying Win10 won't connect to a Samba 3 server? Or is Win10-connectivity only a problem when a Samba 3 server is providing AD services? I've got MANY Linux boxes providing simple share of data files... If Win10 won't talk to them, that's huge for me. Thanks for

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

What will you lose? The ability to interact with a SAMBA 3 Domain. Well, that could be a problem. I've got legacy Linux servers deployed at client sites with older Samba servers, working fine for years. Looks like I'll have to look at upgrade options. The Windows Update is free, but the

Re: [NF] Win10 what you will lose in the OS update

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Ken Dibble krdib...@stny.rr.com wrote: SAMBA 4 emulates Active Directory, though I don't know how well. Looking around at samba.org, it seems like Samba 4.1 is specifcally targeting Windows 10 AD.