Yes, you may know what you really want (but not always) and
really need (not nearly so often the case). You are the guy with
the money, and you are the guy who makes the decisions, and none of
this guarantees that you are not about to make a totally stupid
decision, or one that is
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gene Wirchenko
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 2:08 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: Problem with GROUP BY
At 13:06 2016-02-20, "jerry foote" wrote:
>Thanks for all the feed back
At 11:34 2016-02-22, Ted Roche wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> I have a new job which I hope will work out. Part of why I have it is
> because of this failure in communication. It is quite the juggling act.
Best of
At 13:06 2016-02-20, "jerry foote" wrote:
Thanks for all the feed back on the group by clause.
This what I ended up with
SELECT service.manifest_n, service.bill_of_la, service.release_no,
service.frm_acct, service.source,;
service.source_id, sum(service.units) as totat
At 12:22 2016-02-20, Paul Hill wrote:
On 20 February 2016 at 16:20, Graham Brown wrote:
> The Virgin Media router also has DHCP.
My Virgin Media has an option for 'modem mode' or similar that
switches off DHCP.
You can find this in the admin
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> I have a new job which I hope will work out. Part of why I have it is
> because of this failure in communication. It is quite the juggling act.
>
Best of luck in your new job!
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche &
At 12:35 2016-02-19, "Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox)"
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> Happy Friday, all, and permit me to vent a little steam...
>
The only quibble is that I wouldn't add the [NF] tag -- it is F and
At 08:02 2016-02-19, Ken Dibble wrote:
* Ted Roche wrote:
The Original Poster (OP) fails to explain:
- why they want to do this,
- what their environment is (OS, #records, performance needed, etc.),
- what they have tried as an alternative,
- the bigger picture of how
I have forwarded this to the committee that handles it. I am not sure when the
next round of nominations is going to be
opened.
Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.
www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech
Hey - I liked that Dragons comment!
Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Consultant
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:44 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re:
I've never seen STFW before, until you just mentioned it Peter. Of course, the
milder term used by Ted is the LMGTFY.com!:-)
Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Consultant
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
You may well get a better response making this [NF] as opposed to [OT] Graham!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 22 February 2016 17:21
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Two DHCP servers on a
Doh!!! read this as DNS not DHCP!! But the same thing goes as the DHCP is
turned on for each DNS server but only one is in operation at any one time.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 22 February 2016 17:18
To: ProFox
We have 2 x DNS 2012 servers on the network DNS-A and DNS-B but the second one
is only used in auto failover situations within the 3 clusters. Maybe you
should take a look at clustering.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Graham Brown
;-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter Cushing
Sent: 22 February 2016 17:07
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Including an SQL expression builder on a form
On 22/02/2016 17:03, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Oops, I forgot to add Doug into
On 22/02/2016 17:03, Dave Crozier wrote:
Oops, I forgot to add Doug into the mix!!
Dave
I thought as soon as you started listing names, you were digging a
hole. Everyone not on the list is a bad coder ;-)
Donald Trump will be sooo pissed ;-)
Peter
This communication is intended for the
Oops, I forgot to add Doug into the mix!!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: 22 February 2016 17:03
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Including an SQL expression builder on a form
Doug Hennig's code, in the Stonefield
Doug Hennig's code, in the Stonefield Tools, was something I needed to
review in depth, mostly in the debugger, to chase down an obscure bug
in a client's database. Excellent coding style, imo.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> I'll add Andy Kramek and
I'll add Andy Kramek and Marcia's coding style into the good pot also!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 22 February 2016 16:58
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: Including an SQL expression builder
Yes,
Calvin and also John Koziol were excellent coders but I just couldn't get on
with Ken Levi's programming style - a little like his speaking style i.e. all
enthusiasm and disconnected jumping from subject to subject. Steven Black
certainly writes great neat structured code, which raises the
Yes, now you mention it I went through the same maze years ago, and gave up.
It's amazing how so much of vfp stuff (the bits we can see) is so
opaque, but other parts are elegant and clear - almost anything from
Calvin /Hsia for example./
On 22/02/2016 17:34, Dave Crozier wrote:
Andy,
I had
Andy,
I had a look for it in xSource some time ago. The Wizard is there but it is
that convoluted it would be quicker to rewrite it!!!. It is all linked in to
the Wizard framework that M$ used and it is like unravelling spaghetti!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox
Isn't it in xsource?
On 20/02/2016 01:15, Joe Yoder wrote:
Thanks Stephen,
I was hoping there is a way to programatically access the functionality
include in the Query Builder. - apparently not.
Thanks again,
Joe
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Stephen Russell
Query Maker was one - seems it's still available:
www.hallogram.com/qrymkr/
I tried it years ago but found it too complicated for what I wanted. I
ended up building a simple one using the picker class (samples or
foundation classes??) for users to run against un-normalised views that
I
24 matches
Mail list logo