Right you areit does seem to be very capable for a ridiculous price.
Unfortunately, while it will create a shortcut for the desktop that will
take you directly to the desired remote computer's desktop (this is
EXACTLY what I'm looking for), that same double-click of the shortcut
insists
Thanks, Peter! I'm still looking (after taking a short break to deal
with more pressing matters.)
Mike
Peter Cushing wrote:
On 06/11/2017 08:38, Alan Bourke wrote:
Take a look at Thinstuff maybe.
http://www.thinstuff.com/products
Uses RDP but far cheaper than implementing a Microsoft RDP
XPS is Microsoft's proprietary answer to PDFs. You can extrapolate from there.
If you're all Windows all the time, the fact that it's built into the OS could
offer the advantages mentioned by Paul. Good luck using those docs outside the
context of Windows.
--
rk
-Original Message-
In my experience, FoxyPreviewer handles PDF docs seamlessly - you don't
need a UI.
Laurie
On 7 November 2017 at 19:33,
wrote:
> On 2017-11-07 13:44, Paul Hemans wrote:
>
>> Yes it was easier. I needed the application to have no user interface. I
>>
On 2017-11-07 13:44, Paul Hemans wrote:
Yes it was easier. I needed the application to have no user interface.
I
had a lot of problems getting a seamless print to happen using PDF
without
looking to pay for licenses which I didn't want to do at the time.
That's interesting. I'm working
Yes it was easier. I needed the application to have no user interface. I
had a lot of problems getting a seamless print to happen using PDF without
looking to pay for licenses which I didn't want to do at the time.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:41 AM,
On 2017-11-07 13:29, Paul Hemans wrote:
I have used it for automated printing through .net
Was it easier to use/implement?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
I have used it for automated printing through .net
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:28 AM, wrote:
> Why would somebody use this instead of creating a PDF? Was this M$'s
> effort to replace Adobe's PDF file? Always wondered that.
>
[excessive quoting
Why would somebody use this instead of creating a PDF? Was this M$'s
effort to replace Adobe's PDF file? Always wondered that.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
On 11/7/2017 8:34 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
I am now found.
Was blind, but now you see...
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
I am now found.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 11:22 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] LogMeIn -- Richard
On 2017-11-06 16:44,
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Mike wrote:
>
> So far, Remote Utilities (yeah, goofy name, but that's what they call it)
> seems to be the front runner. In case this helps someone else I'll keep you
> posted.
>
Wow, RU seems too good to be true! Which should make a reasonable
On 06/11/2017 08:38, Alan Bourke wrote:
Take a look at Thinstuff maybe.
http://www.thinstuff.com/products
Uses RDP but far cheaper than implementing a Microsoft RDP server setup.
Works fine for VFP applications.
We use this and it works great. We also use RDP guard to stop brute
force
13 matches
Mail list logo