On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Malcolm Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any comments on the statements made in this article?
A company that tries to get your business through fear rather than
offering a superior product is one that I don't want to do business
with.
Yeah, what everybody else
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Malcolm Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any comments on the statements made in this article?
A company that tries to get your business through fear rather than
offering a superior product is
Vince Teachout wrote:
What a bunch of manure. 58 versions of licensing permutations? Gasp!
As opposed to unlimited permutations for proprietary licenses?Open
source license complexity? As compared to Microsoft license
simplicity?It doesn't provide the level of testing that
Any comments on the statements made in this article?
Why Open Source Database Drivers Are Not Viable
http://www.datadirect.com/developer/jdbc/open-source-database-drivers/index.ssp
Thanks,
Malcolm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
On Jul 24, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
Any comments on the statements made in this article?
Sounds a lot like FUD to me. There are so many concerns raised about
the risk inherent in open source licenses, but there is not a single
OSI-approved license that is even close
Malcolm Greene wrote:
Any comments on the statements made in this article?
A lot of the points apply equally to proprietary software.
Paul
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Malcolm Greene wrote:
Any comments on the statements made in this article?
Why Open Source Database Drivers Are Not Viable
http://www.datadirect.com/developer/jdbc/open-source-database-drivers/index.ssp
What a bunch of manure. 58 versions of licensing permutations? Gasp!
As opposed to
7 matches
Mail list logo
