: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router
recommendation(CLARIFIED)
All,
I've continued researching the highly recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about
$100 US).
My initial concern that this product might have
Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6?
--- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router
recommendation(CLARIFIED)
To: profox@leafe.com
Date: Saturday
: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:14
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router
recommendation(CLARIFIED)
Can you use existing CAT 5 cabling or do you have to upgrade to CAT 6?
--- On Sat, 9/13/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 2008-09-13 18:02, Malcolm wrote:
I've continued researching the highly
recommended D-Link DIR 655 (about $100 US).
A little background story to why I bought this
router - maybe someone finds it useful...
I'm connected to the citys fiber-lan via
ethernet.and pays for 100Mb/10Mb
I'm looking for a small network gigabit router recommendation - I
have several servers that will be moving large amounts of
data.between themselves. I don't have the budget for a SAN. Would
also like to connect a wireless hub to this mix. Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Malcolm
--- StripMime Report --
Apple Airport or TimeCapsule g...
Gil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NF] Looking for small network gigabit router recommendation
I'm looking
At 2008-09-12 23:49, you wrote:
I'm looking for a small network gigabit router recommendation - I
have several servers that will be moving large amounts of
data.between themselves. I don't have the budget for a SAN. Would
also like to connect a wireless hub to this mix. Any suggestions?
D-Link
Dan,
D-Link DIR-655
All ports Gigabit and very high throughput both on LAN and WAN.
I'm reading reviews on Amazon and NewEgg and (so far) this seems to be
the product to buy.
My only concern: Some people have complained that this device is not
compatible with 64-bit OS's. Any thoughts?
Gil,
Apple Airport or TimeCapsule g...
A little to far out for me. But thanks!
Malcolm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Malcolm Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only concern: Some people have complained that this device is not
compatible with 64-bit OS's. Any thoughts?
That's bizarre. TCP doesn't care whether the senders nor receivers are
32-bit or 64-bit, Windows or OS X or
Hi Ted,
My only concern: Some people have complained that this device is not
compatible with 64-bit OS's. Any thoughts?
That's bizarre. TCP doesn't care whether the senders nor receivers are
32-bit or 64-bit, Windows or OS X or Linux or Solaris. I wonder if
Microsoft's implementation of TCP
11 matches
Mail list logo
