RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Adam Buckland
A British Embassy spokesman said: The bust of Sir Winston Churchill by Sir Jacob Epstein was uniquely lent to a foreign head of state, President George W Bush, from the Government Art Collection in the wake of 9/11 as a signal of the strong transatlantic relationship. It was lent for the first

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Madigan
Of course the fact that he's Kenyan and hates the British has no bearing on it whatsoever.  - Original Message - From: Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 5:40 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so

RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Adam Buckland
A fact that no one has been able to prove except in a small group of birthers imagination.. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 19 March 2012 09:49 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Madigan
His Father is a Kenyan.  - Original Message - From: Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 5:59 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand A fact that no one has been able to prove except in

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Nicholas Geti
Typical of the liberals. As I said many times, as soon as one comments about a liberal, they all counterattack with you conservatives did this and that. without actually defending their cause. Instead of making the case that Obama can be understood they immediately said how bad Bush was at

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Madigan
When he's speaking without the teleprompter suddenly we have 57 states.      From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 3:34 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Nicholas Geti
Again and again you liberals change the subject and attack any answers to the new subject. Get with the program and defend the original premise that Obama is understandable. You have not done that. We all know Bush was a malaprop so why beat that point to death and hope it will deflect any

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Stephen Russell
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net wrote: Typical of the liberals. As I said many times, as soon as one comments about a liberal, they all counterattack with you conservatives did this and that. without actually defending their cause. Instead of making the case

RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread geoff
I was making an APOLITICAL comment that it is rather hypocritical to criticise Obama's speech-making after Bush's mangling of the english language during his term. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread geoff
And under Bush, 'fish have human rights' -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Tuesday, 20 March 2012 6:14 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand When he's

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Madigan
You're an idiot, and that's an apolitical statement.   - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 5:37 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand I was making an APOLITICAL

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread Ricardo Araoz
El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió: Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Does this mean GWB was that

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread Michael Madigan
Obama's greatest speeches were written by someone else.   He book, Dreams of My Father, was written by someone else.    He's a fraud.  From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:00 PM Subject:

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread Ricardo Araoz
El 18/03/12 19:04, Michael Madigan escribió: Obama's greatest speeches were written by someone else. He book, Dreams of My Father, was written by someone else. He's a fraud. From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List

RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread geoff
the point is that all things being equal... (and they are) Obama is a superb orator and GWB was so bad, he is now the STANDARD in bad. both had teleprompters, both had other people write their speeches. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread Michael Madigan
What does it matter?   Having oratory skills doesn't make you a good person.   Hitler was a mesmerizing orator who got his whole country to stuff Jews into ovens without a second thought.    I'll take a good man with limited speaking skills over an evil bastards like Obama and Hitler.  

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread Michael Oke, II
Sorry but no. There are far worse examples that resided at the same address. And the only people that find Obama to be such a wonderful orator are those that are enthralled with everything that he does regardless of it actual value. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread Michael Madigan
Rabble Rouser, nothing more.   An empty, soulless suit.  From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 7:22 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand Sorry but no.  There

RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread geoff
well hows this for a shock... I agree with you. some of the most evil men in history were amazing orators. but so were some of history's GREATEST men. Churchill, Martin Luther King just to name a few. I was only saying that GWB was just truly awful and Obama is an excellent orator. it remains

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-18 Thread Michael Madigan
Obama hates Churchill and sent his bust back to England.   More proof that he's an evil bastard.  From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:26 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to

RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-17 Thread geoff
I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who has literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish have human rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate president - if indeed ever.

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-17 Thread Pete Theisen
geoff wrote: I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who has literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish have human rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate president

RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-17 Thread geoff
while avoiding the politics since to be honest, i dont care that much, Bush was ALWAYS inarticulate and Obama is in fact a great orator. saying something of substance is always a different manner. but i had a desk calendar full of Bushisms. politics aside, he was a terrible, truly awful public

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-17 Thread Michael Oke, II
Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated

Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

2012-03-17 Thread Michael Madigan
Listen to Obama speak without a teleprompter and he's mediocre at best.   - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 12:45 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand while