RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost

above all and even bought the paid for version for real time scanning. Dave -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz Sent: 21 November 2013 14:24 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost I got roped in when it found

RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost

Spybot SD or Malwarebytes. Both free. John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 I've been using Spyhunter, but at $40/year, it's too much, imo. Recommendations? Suggestions? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost

Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz Sent: 21 November 2013 14:24 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost I got roped in when it found a problem, but wanted $$ to remove it. Somewhat mal-ish itself. On Nov 21, 2013 9:14

RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost

I got roped in when it found a problem, but wanted $$ to remove it. Somewhat mal-ish itself. On Nov 21, 2013 9:14 AM, Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk wrote: Superantispyware It's free for the stantard version -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On

RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost

Superantispyware It's free for the stantard version -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz Sent: 21 November 2013 14:13 To: ProFox Email List Subject: [NF] Malware protection vs cost I've been using Spyhunter, but at $40/year, it's

RE: [NF] Malware protection vs cost

Spybot SD or Malwarebytes. Both free. I like MalwareBytes for manual scans. Spybot: I used to like it. Lately though, all it ever seems to find on anybody's machine is the same mostly-harmless tracking cookie--even when MalwareBytes and Avast! find lots of other stuff on the same machine.