Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

Bob Calco wrote: > Getting pregnant out of wedlock is wrong Hi Bob! I kind of like the idea of having a grand baby but I can't get the right kind of cooperation. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subs

RE: [OT] Nope, no bias here

> This is going to backfire, big time, on the Left. I agree, they are making a huge error in judgment here... v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:58 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One cannot impose values, but one can impose regulations that deny values. > The girl made a mistake, but she did not choose to compound the mistake by > killing the innocent child. I would say the Ms Palin has done a pretty good >

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

s.com/rightwingmike/5690856 I Wish Hillary had married OJ http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4236924 --- On Wed, 9/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here > To: profox@leafe.com >

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

>I do find it funny how she cannot uphold the moral values she wants to >impose on the nation in her own family...food for thought. I find it funny and telling that Jean uses the word 'impose'. Compulsion is it MO of the left. The only time they talk about freedom or free choice is when they w

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

Really? Who do you propose will support and raise the child then? The Government? > > btw that idea of those two teens getting married is > probably a bad one too ___ Post

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> I do find it funny how she cannot uphold the moral values she wants to >> impose on the nation in her own family...food for thought. > > Jean, you

RE: [OT] Nope, no bias here

http://tinyurl.com/5sq7n5 - - - The Us magazine cover story is filed under the URL slug "sarah-palin-very-difficult-to-work-with". This particular smear job on Sarah Palin was literally spoon fed to the magazine and bloggers on the left by the Huffington Post that featured a hacked up YouTube ver

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

/rightwingmike/5690856 I Wish Hillary had married OJ http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4236924 --- On Wed, 9/3/08, Jean Laeremans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Jean Laeremans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here > To: "ProFox Email List"

RE: [OT] Nope, no bias here

> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I do find it funny how she cannot uphold the moral values she wants to > impose on the nation in her own family...food for thought. Jean, you simply don't get it, my friend. Just because I promote a particular Christ

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I do find it funny how she cannot uphold the moral values she wants to impose on the nation in her own family...food for thought. A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscr

Re: [OT] Nope, no bias here

Bob Calco wrote: > About Obama: > > http://www.drudgereport.com/us1.jpg > > About Sarah: > > http://markhalperin.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/usnewscover.jpg > > This is infuriating. I'm going to donate another $100 to McCain's campaign > today. Hi Bob! Good, glad you can help! Don't worry ab

RE: [OT] Nope, no bias here

s.com/rightwingmike/4236924 --- On Fri, 7/25/08, Kristyne McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Kristyne McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Nope, no bias here > To: "'ProFox Email List'" > Date: Friday, July 25, 2008, 5:15 PM > Bob, >

RE: [OT] Nope, no bias here

> Bob, > > > I am really appalled at the fact the NYT rejected McCain's op ed > after > > printing Obama's. That's low even by their entirely > > compromised standards. > > But when you follow the money, you see the whole mainstream > > media *really > > is* in the tank for the Obamessiah. > > Th

RE: [OT] Nope, no bias here

Bob, > I am really appalled at the fact the NYT rejected McCain's op ed after > printing Obama's. That's low even by their entirely > compromised standards. > But when you follow the money, you see the whole mainstream > media *really > is* in the tank for the Obamessiah. The NYT has published