On 11/25/2019 9:35 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, at 6:41 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
I thought we were pretty much told there would be no new operating
systems past Windows 10, so if your VFP app ran on Windows 10 now, then
it was going to run forever.
Windows 10X
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, at 6:41 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
> I thought we were pretty much told there would be no new operating
> systems past Windows 10, so if your VFP app ran on Windows 10 now, then
> it was going to run forever.
Windows 10X is not Windows 10 like on your
I thought we were pretty much told there would be no new operating
systems past Windows 10, so if your VFP app ran on Windows 10 now, then
it was going to run forever.
On 11/22/2019 11:13 AM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
This is good news. From what I gathered from the article the 32 bit apps
Same OS just with various bits not enabled. And lots of very annoying bits
enabled.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Home should work no problem...
Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
T 01706 222 792
E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
Follow us:
Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire, BB4 5HH
Thanks Tracey and John!
On 2019-03-01 17:06, Tracy Pearson wrote:
Yes.
VFP 9 installs on HOME, and I have several customers that I've seen
using
HOME with our product.
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
I use VFP9 on Home.
John
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
VFP9SP2 apps work fine on Windows 10 HOME, right? I know they work fine on
Win10 Professional but am double-checking the HOME version.
tia,
--Mike
___
Post Messages to:
Yes.
VFP 9 installs on HOME, and I have several customers that I've seen using
HOME with our product.
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 4:55 PM
To:
ntitled at any
time
-Original Message-
From: ProFox On Behalf Of Paul Hill
Sent: 29 May 2018 18:49
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Windows 10 April 2018 Update & Running EXE from Shared drive
(Samba)
Hi Gang,
Does anyone know if MS released a changelog for this Windows release?
I'm
So much fun, isn't it?
The only problem we've seen (so far) is the can't connect remote desktop.
Changing the server setting to uncheck the requirement for a secure
connection at least lets that work.
Connecting to SQL server has been noproblem.
Fred
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Paul Hill
Hi Gang,
Does anyone know if MS released a changelog for this Windows release?
I'm seeing odd network issues that are unrelated to my previous problems.
e.g. can't connect to SQL server, access denied errors when creating a
listening socket.
--
Paul
client's databases
> was just too risky.
>
> --
>
> rk
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 7:19 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Windows 10 Ap
:19 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 April 2018 Update & Running EXE from Shared drive
(Samba)
IMO despite some initial problems with CDX corruption and SMB2 there has been
no reason not to use it for over 10 years since those problems were fixed. If
nothing else it
IMO despite some initial problems with CDX corruption and SMB2 there has been
no reason not to use it for over 10 years since those problems were fixed. If
nothing else it is orders of magnitude faster than SMB1.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
It's not about running EXEs, it's about network connections:
> Windows 10 update 1803 does not open *network connections* on executables
> files on SMBv1 share.
Explains why my ADS was blocked.
People using Samba with SMB2 disable will have this problem too.
--
Paul
This issue is caused because SMB2 is disabled!
Thanks to Alan Bourke for pointing me in the right direction.
--
Paul
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
On 10 May 2018 at 08:53, Alan Bourke wrote:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50172067/sqlconnection-error-if-exe-is-executed-from-network-path
>
> Looking at the above it seems to indicate that you can no longer run EXEs
> from shared locations when the protocol is
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Mike wrote:
>
> But I still love to hate Windows.
>
Everyone needs a hobby.
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
> But I still love to hate Windows.
It's an annoying bugger sometimes.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
Alan,
Confirmed. Many thanks!
But I still love to hate Windows.
Mike
Alan Bourke wrote:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50172067/sqlconnection-error-if-exe-is-executed-from-network-path
Looking at the above it seems to indicate that you can no longer run EXEs from
shared locations
I'm placing my bets on your deduction, Alan.
Now to make sure my Samba servers are all up-to-date!
Thank you!
Mike
Alan Bourke wrote:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50172067/sqlconnection-error-if-exe-is-executed-from-network-path
Looking at the above it seems to indicate that you can
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50172067/sqlconnection-error-if-exe-is-executed-from-network-path
Looking at the above it seems to indicate that you can no longer run EXEs from
shared locations when the protocol is SMB1. Having said that SMB1 was
superseded in 2007 and deprecated in 2014.
Homegroup was removed in 1803, if you're not using a Windows domain due to your
servers being Linux I don't know if that is relevant.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
I don't know if you can find something here :
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletins.aspx
El jue., 10 may. 2018 7:22, Mike escribió:
> Fernando,
>
> Would love to.
>
> Where to start?
>
> Mike
>
>
> Fernando D. Bozzo wrote:
> > Hi Mike:
> >
> > If you
Fernando,
Would love to.
Where to start?
Mike
Fernando D. Bozzo wrote:
Hi Mike:
If you suspect that the problem could be because of a new restriction
policy, you may try to find the full description of what did include this
update.
El jue., 10 may. 2018 5:33, Mike
Hi Mike:
If you suspect that the problem could be because of a new restriction
policy, you may try to find the full description of what did include this
update.
El jue., 10 may. 2018 5:33, Mike escribió:
> Thanks, Gianni. That's a dead-on exact match for what I've run into.
Thanks, Gianni. That's a dead-on exact match for what I've run into.
But, the TechNet article you referenced seems to point the finger at
SMBv1, or higher not being available.
While this might be the case, it's obvious that Windows 10 1803 is now
applying additional restrictions when the EXE
Someone on the Italian TechNet Forum had a similar problem but with SQL server.
May be you can find something useful in the discussion.
Problemi connessione SQL dopo l'aggiornamento di Aprile 2018
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/it-IT/38a6727a-7dce-48ef-8c3e-a69e7847c9b8/
Gianni
On
Have already tried that. No change.
To be more precise...it's not that the EXE won't run, it's that the EXE
can't connect to my Maria DB server.
BUT!
Since the same application CAN connect to Maria DB if the EXE is run
locally, this appears to be a security policy issue.
I am NOT on a
Try enabling "SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support" in "Windows features".
Gianni
On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:23:49 -0500, Mike wrote:
Heads up...
After updating to Win 10 Pro 17134 (last night) apps that are stored on a
network share (Samba server) will no longer run. Move the EXE
"hold off the regular monthly updates for up to 30 days", god! I had
forgotten what Wd$ was all about. Thanks for the reminder.
On 09/05/18 17:03, Ted Roche wrote:
One of my clients had to recreate all their RDP settings. Whether that
was related to this change, or just because the target
One of my clients had to recreate all their RDP settings. Whether that
was related to this change, or just because the target machine changed
its DNS name and that didn't show until the monthly reboot, well, we
may never know.
The post I made earlier about blocking the "April Update" also had
Thanks Paul. Now maybe I'll have to talk someone through how to change it,
since it's a remote site.
Fred
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Paul Hill wrote:
> On 9 May 2018 at 20:00, Fred Taylor wrote:
> > We don't use Advantage, but we had a
f Paul Hill
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 3:13 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 April 2018 Update & ADS Server
On 9 May 2018 at 20:00, Fred Taylor <fbtay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We don't use Advantage, but we had a problem with a machine trying to use
> remote de
On 9 May 2018 at 20:00, Fred Taylor wrote:
> We don't use Advantage, but we had a problem with a machine trying to use
> remote desktop after the latest update for W10. Had to uninstall it. It
> kept saying something about security corruption.
The old 'Allow remote
We don't use Advantage, but we had a problem with a machine trying to use
remote desktop after the latest update for W10. Had to uninstall it. It
kept saying something about security corruption.
.
Fred
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
If you are only using US English in language settings, nothing would go bad. :)
But I noticed that some differences regarding Chinese Hong Kong
Language Pack between Home and Professional. It seemed that Win 10
Home didn't install Hong Kong's Supplementary Character Set. I didn't
noticed the same
-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 2:58 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 Anniversary Update Massively Broken
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Kurt
Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 2:58 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 Anniversary Update Massively Broken
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Kurt Wendt <kurt_we...@globetax.com> wrote:
> So - it's the Windows version of Russian Roulette! :-)
Well, except you
On 8/4/2016 2:57 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
So - it's the Windows version of Russian Roulette! :-)
Well, except you don't get any vodka...
... and you have to clean up the mess after you lose ;^)
Oh, that is just
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> So - it's the Windows version of Russian Roulette! :-)
Well, except you don't get any vodka...
... and you have to clean up the mess after you lose ;^)
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 Anniversary Update Massively Broken
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Paul Hill <paulroberth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 17:12, Ken Dibble <krdib...@stny.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> Even more reasons why we all should bend o
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Paul Hill wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 17:12, Ken Dibble wrote:
>>
>> Even more reasons why we all should bend over and let Microsoft force
>> "updates" on us, and why software professionals should advise people that
On 4 August 2016 at 17:12, Ken Dibble wrote:
> Woody Leonhard, I guy I trust:
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/3104389/microsoft-windows/the-case-against-windows-10-anniversary-update-grows.html
>
> Even more reasons why we all should bend over and let Microsoft force
>
This really sounds like a re-run of the horrors they had with rolling
out version 3.11 of Windows for Workgroups.
And every single version since then.
Bill's gone, Steve's gone, and yet...
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
> Woody Leonhard, I guy I trust:
Update
Thank you all for your comments/opinions or otherwise.
My client has reversed the Win10 update and all is well again.
i.e. same pc, same office, no change to my application.
It simply fails to "append general", as in it skips this line in my code.
So now I have time to apply a
On 2016-07-27 04:59, Alan Bourke wrote:
I just tested this under Windows 10, VFP9 SP2 and a small table with a
general field linked to Word 2016 .docx files. It seems to indeed work
fine once I set the properties of the report field to 'Scale Picture -
Retain Shape'.
So again I would strongly
In my case, I started with an invoice already in a PDF, as that's how
I send them to clients. I'm a big fan of PDF for this purpose: they're
not (easily) modified, the print pretty at the client's site
regardless of their printers, and they make a professional appearance.
Word, not so much.
Okay, Sytze, Alan says it works fine.
Is it possible that you are trying to run 64-bit Office from within
(always 32-bit) Visual FoxPro? That might cause a problem.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
> I just tested this under Windows 10, VFP9 SP2 and a
That's how most do it!
Storing those files outside of VFP DBF files actually improve security
and ease of management. You can make use of the file sytsem's features
to manage them. In the case of extreme security breaches, you could
just relocate if not delete the file, instead of having to dig
I just tested this under Windows 10, VFP9 SP2 and a small table with a
general field linked to Word 2016 .docx files. It seems to indeed work
fine once I set the properties of the report field to 'Scale Picture -
Retain Shape'.
So again I would strongly suspect path resolution issues.
--
Alan
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, at 10:11 PM, Sytze de Boer wrote:
> Yes, I'm trying to print the Doc file embedded in a report. Like you can
> with a picture.
I'm amazed that *ever* worked without getting involved in
ReportListeners.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 and Append General
Yes, I'm trying to print the Doc file embedded in a report. Like you can with a
picture.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Ted Roche <tedro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Sytze de Boer
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Sytze de Boer wrote:
>
> My remaining issue though, is there some way I can print a report with the
> DOC file details.? (In much the same way as printing a report with a JPG
> file, or otherwise)
>
I'm sorry for being dense, but what do you
Yes, I'm trying to print the Doc file embedded in a report. Like you can
with a picture.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Sytze de Boer
> wrote:
> >
> > My remaining issue though, is there some way
Thank you all for your opinions/advice.
I am happy to NOT store data in the General field, since the data is
already saved in DOC format, which is unique to each invoice.
("INV"+alltrim(str(invnum))+".DOC"
My remaining issue though, is there some way I can print a report with the
DOC file
[reordered to chronological]
At 02:26 2016-07-26, Dave Crozier wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Sytze de Boer
Sent: 26 July 2016 04:46
To: profox
Subject: Windows 10 and Append General
So I
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Koen Piller wrote:
> And Ted yes I am with you when changing functional good running code.
> However Sytze has a problem with exactly that. So in this case it is my
> opinion to change completely and dont store anything in a General Field
Alan
I mistread sure my advise was for Sytze.
And Ted yes I am with you when changing functional good running code.
However Sytze has a problem with exactly that. So in this case it is my
opinion to change completely and dont store anything in a General Field but
change the code I am sure he will
> Alan,
>
> Donot store anything in GeneralFields, and if you must than donot.
I don't. The original questioner did.
> Just store the fullpath in of the .doc .xls or whatever file in your memo
> field.
I generally store a relative path beneath a defined root location and
retrieve files when
Well, I think the effect that Sytze was depending on was the feature
of General fields that store a bitmap image of the linked OLE object
in the field, suitable, in some cases, for printing. That's how the
FRX report worked.
It's a dangerous thing to depend on, since different OLE servers store
Alan,
Donot store anything in GeneralFields, and if you must than donot.
Just store the fullpath in of the .doc .xls or whatever file in your memo
field.
Advise you to change your code and I can garantee you will be a happy
foxpro user again.
Regards,
Koen
2016-07-26 9:46 GMT+02:00 Alan Bourke
Sytze:
As you're coming to learn, depending on Microsoft to maintain their
APIs and compatibility from version to version is a gamble.
Unless there's some reason the client wants to edit their invoices
after sending, rather than saving in Word, have them save a PDF file.
Test out your code to
/products.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 26 July 2016 11:17
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 and Append General
Dave Crozier wrote:
> Even SQLExpress can now hold over 100Gb of data
Currently it is 1
Dave Crozier wrote:
> Even SQLExpress can now hold over 100Gb of data
Currently it is 10GB per database, you can have as many databases as
disk space allows.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
No, No, No ... General fields are the work of the devil bloated memo files,
VFP table size restrictions, links that get mysteriously corrupted, slow as
hell etc.
Better to store your binary data outside VFP in a SQL server of some type which
is made for the job and/or just store links to
Not saving in Program files are you?
That's a no no now.
Al
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan
Bourke
Sent: 26 July 2016 09:47
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10 and Append General
> It seems this no longer wo
> It seems this no longer works with Win10
I don't know why it wouldn't work with Windows 10 other than you are
linking it and it can't resolve the path in the link.
If you do MODIFY GENERAL does it bring up the .DOC?
Frankly I'm surprised it worked on a report layout in *any* OS. The help
I don't use the GENERAL data type in VFP.
I always think It's better to store binary data outside of DBF.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Sytze de Boer wrote:
> So I have used this approach for 20 years and it has always worked
> My client prepares an invoice using Word
>
Here's (possibly) some helpful info.
I have a client that I upgraded from Win7 to 10, and he uses Excel a
LOT. There's a website that he goes to and they have a link he clicks
that downloads a collection of data that is autoloaded from the browser
into Excel. Well, after working for years
Using the CLSID {054AAE20-4BEA-4347-8A35-64A533254A9D}, the LocalServer32
key has a default value that will point to the TabTip.exe. Running that will
launch the onscreen keyboard.
I dug through a patch to some code to discover that.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8643501=diff
Thanks to Alan and Paul. I'd forgotten about the Disk Cleanup tool.
John
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
>
> There is a 'Windows.old' folder, which is your old installation should you
> decide to roll back. Here's how to delete it:
> http://blog.laptopmag.com/delete-windows-old-folder
>
There is a 'Windows.old' folder, which is your old installation should
you decide to roll back. Here's how to delete it:
http://blog.laptopmag.com/delete-windows-old-folder
Obviously don't delete it until your are 100% sure.
I think any '$windows' folder is the location to which the Windows 10
Hi John,
I think it's related to the upgrade process.
If you are happy with Windows 10 and don't want to downgrade you can run
the 'Disk Clean-Up' tool that is built into Windows.
Paul
On 3 September 2015 at 10:32, John Weller wrote:
> I've just successfully upgrade to
On 5 August 2015 at 22:19, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I discovered this bug in C# but I suspect it will effect other
languages. It looks like ADO is effected so could effect Fox.
Windows 10
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I discovered this bug in C# but I suspect it will effect other
languages. It looks like ADO is effected so could effect Fox.
Windows 10 introduced changes to the following cultures:
Finnish (Finland)
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
snip
3.11 is an interesting version number. Networking got added to
Windows. You might have thought that this was a big thing, but the
version number was not bumped to 4 or even 3.2.
If I remember correctly it was called Windows for workgroups and it
It was in the days of DDE and you could change chart data on one machine and
have the chart update on another. DDE was brilliant, yet now there is talk
of windows machines talking like that. All old hat , been done.
Al
-Original Message-
If I remember correctly it was called Windows for
3.11 is an interesting version number. Networking got added to
Windows.
Not exactly. There was Windows 3.1, and then Windows 3.11 which was what
we would now think of as a service pack for Windows 3.1, i.e. not a
standalone product. These had network support but only with third-party
On 2014-10-20 16:44, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Oct 20, 2014, at 12:58 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Was Windows 1.0 the one where Steve Ballmer did a crazy commercial
akin to Crazy Eddie back in the 80s? Crazy Eddiehis prices are
INSANE! lol
On Oct 17, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't think it will be a problem. Windows 10 is basically Windows 8.2.
Love this! http://talkinthe.net/Images/2014/10/21/001.jpg
-- Ed Leafe
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
On 10/21/2014 11:27 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 2014-10-20 16:44, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Oct 20, 2014, at 12:58 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Was Windows 1.0 the one where Steve Ballmer did a crazy commercial
akin to Crazy Eddie back in the
On 10/21/2014 12:59 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Oct 17, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't think it will be a problem. Windows 10 is basically Windows 8.2.
Love this! http://talkinthe.net/Images/2014/10/21/001.jpg
-- Ed Leafe
for a '9'.
Maybe MS can solve the problem in their time-tested fashion, by
renaming everything.
Dan Covill
From: j...@johnweller.co.uk
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Windows 10
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:42:16 +0100
What happened to Windows 9?
John Weller
, long, long time ago.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:22 PM, jeff j...@san-dc.com wrote:
Wasn't there an NT 2.0?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com
Date:10/18/2014 07:02 (GMT-07:00)
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10
message
From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com
Date:10/18/2014 07:02 (GMT-07:00)
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
This
is the company that made:
Windows 3
Windows 3.11
Windows 95
Windows NT
Windows NT 3.51
WIndows 98
From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com
Date:10/18/2014 07:02 (GMT-07:00)
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
This
is the company that made:
Windows 3
Windows 3.11
Windows 95
Windows NT
Windows NT 3.51
WIndows 98
At 07:02 2014-10-18, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
This
is the company that made:
Windows 3
Windows 3.11
Windows 95
Windows NT
Windows NT 3.51
WIndows 98
Windows NT 4
Windows Me
Windows 2000
Windows Vista
Windows 7
On Oct 20, 2014, at 12:58 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Was Windows 1.0 the one where Steve Ballmer did a crazy commercial akin to
Crazy Eddie back in the 80s? Crazy Eddiehis prices are INSANE!
lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
-- Ed Leafe
Wow! He almost had hair back then!
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Oct 20, 2014, at 12:58 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Was Windows 1.0 the one where Steve Ballmer did a crazy commercial akin to Crazy Eddie
back in the 80s? Crazy Eddiehis prices are INSANE! lol
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014, at 10:20 PM, AndyHC wrote:
I had a copy of Windows 1.x given out free by ms at a meeting of the PC
Users Group in London sometime in the mid 80s.
In sort of similar news, we very occasionally have a need to dredge up
Foxpro for Windows 2.6 and the old 16-bit version of
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
This
is the company that made:
Windows 3
Windows 3.11
Windows 95
Windows NT
Windows NT 3.51
WIndows 98
Windows NT 4
Windows Me
Windows 2000
Windows Vista
Windows 7
Windows 8
You left out Windows XP. How is that
Wasn't there an NT 2.0?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com
Date:10/18/2014 07:02 (GMT-07:00)
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote
Leafe e...@leafe.com
Date:10/18/2014 07:02 (GMT-07:00)
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
This
is the company that made:
Windows 3
Windows 3.11
Windows 95
Windows NT
Windows NT 3.51
WIndows 98
: Windows 10
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
This
is the company that made:
Windows 3
Windows 3.11
Windows 95
Windows NT
Windows NT 3.51
WIndows 98
Windows NT 4
Windows Me
Windows 2000
Windows Vista
Windows 7
Windows
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Fred Taylor fbtay...@gmail.com wrote:
I can verify the Windows 2.0 runtime with PageMaker. Either that or I'm
mis-remembering the same as you, Ted
Thanks, Fred. We can always look it up and cite Wikipedia:
...@leafe.com
Date:10/18/2014 07:02 (GMT-07:00)
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Windows 10
On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
This
is the company that made:
Windows 3
Windows 3.11
Windows 95
Windows NT
Windows NT 3.51
WIndows 98
Windows NT 4
Windows Me
: Re: Windows 10
I swear I had a copy of Win 1.0
I may have been smoking something (it was a different time then), and
from what I recall it was pretty much click and look...no apps, no
functionality.
I even kept the diskettes for a while along with my Lotus 123 and
Frogger disks.
Mike
Ted
I had a copy of Windows 1.x given out free by ms at a meeting of the PC
Users Group in London sometime in the mid 80s.
On the PC's available at the time it was slower than watching paint dry,
I couldn't get my management even vaguely interested - they had taken
the giant step from mainframes to
On 17 October 2014 20:05, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:
I may have missed it...has anyone tested VFP 9 on Windows 10 yet?
Don't think it will be a problem. Windows 10 is basically Windows 8.2.
--
Paul
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo