Re: Gartner Analyst Relations

2019-11-23 Thread AndyHC

+1

On 24-Nov-2019 1:21 AM, Bill Anderson wrote:

The trouble is MSFT could have easily been the source of the rumor.

Bill Anderson





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/df0f3b2c-0ef8-993c-599a-5683a22e0...@hawthorncottage.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Gartner Analyst Relations

2019-11-23 Thread Bill Anderson
The trouble is MSFT could have easily been the source of the rumor.

Bill Anderson

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 10:40 AM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 11/22/2019 11:40 AM, Vince Teachout wrote:
> > On 11/22/19 10:11 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
> >> Thankfully my memory on bullshit fades but I recall something about
> >> them hosing FoxPro wy before it's true demise.  You others longer
> >> in the game than I may recall better (unless you've got that CRS
> >> syndome too.  CRS = Can't Remember Shit)
> >
> >
> > Yeah, we lost a client because those scrotes and their Foxpro is dead
> > gospel.  "Why would be use an obsolete tech?"
> >
> >
> I'm sure MANY shops/teams out there dumped FoxPro because of Gartner.
> SURE of it.  My employer at the time used their words as gospel and was
> looking to dump the Fox too based on that.  Is it too late for a
> class-action lawsuit against those douchebags?  LOL
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ca+o1enesfkt4y32pmdh1ekk-0omacccdl-gaifh8rdy9oic...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: So, about this VFPA thing...

2019-11-23 Thread Koen Piller
Yes that is one solution. You van also install VFPA in a separate
directory, not in the same as VFP9. One can  than decide to construct the
pjx either in VFP9 or VFPA. Deployment of an exe built under VFPA: mr. Chen
published a document How-to-Do
Rgds
Koen

Op za 23 nov. 2019 om 12:32 schreef MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>

> So do we just keep developing as we were but put the VFPA runtime files
> in place (and deploy them to client sites)?  No real change for our
> development?
>
> On 11/22/2019 11:08 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> > Yes, that is the right site.
> >
> > Happy Coding!
> > Tracy
> >
> > On November 22, 2019 10:42:56 PM EST, Vince Teachout 
> wrote:
> >> Apparently, I've been under a rock, and there's a magically enhanced
> >> VFP9 SP2 that fixes some bugs, can run concurrently with vfp9, and
> >> supports 64 bits.
> >>
> >> Before I download something, am I on the right site:
> >> http://baiyujia.com/vfpadvanced/f_vfpa_about.asp ?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> >> Subscription Maintenance:
> >> https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> >> OT-free version of this list:
> >> https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> >> Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
> >> This message:
> >>
> https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ce5a8b3d-d308-5d78-eeb7-1c92e4e1d...@caracal.net
> >> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions
> >> of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This
> >> statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid
> >> to see the obvious.
> >>
> >> Report [OT] Abuse:
> >>
> http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/ce5a8b3d-d308-5d78-eeb7-1c92e4e1d...@caracal.net
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> >text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/cacuu1su2+av8nc2pxp5sypces9232bmq67rfn10mkfqvzeq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: So, about this VFPA thing...

2019-11-23 Thread Jürgen Wondzinski
Just to be clear: There are TWO versions of VFPA ("A" like the Hex notation
of "10")

a) the patched version of your existing VFP9 installation. This implies that
it's stil a 23Bit version.
This is the version you most probably want to use immediately.
Download the 32Bit on the bottom of:
http://baiyujia.com/vfpadvanced/f_vfpa_about.asp
It needs a current VFP9 installation with SP2, and then creates a new
directory with a patched new VFP9.exe and also copies all of the other files
of your VFP9 source directory.  Thus, after installation you just rename the
old VFP9 directory to something different, and rename the new directory to
the original name, and all your Registrykeys and Links will work without
interruption.

b) a new VFP10 err... VFPA compiler for 64 bit executables. 
Stil with some compatibility problems, and I'm not sure if I would ever need
it, but:
http://baiyujia.com/vfpadvanced/f_vfpa_gotovfpa64.asp



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox  Im Auftrag von Vince Teachout
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. November 2019 04:43
An: ProFox Email List 
Betreff: So, about this VFPA thing...

Apparently, I've been under a rock, and there's a magically enhanced
VFP9 SP2 that fixes some bugs, can run concurrently with vfp9, and supports
64 bits.

Before I download something, am I on the right site: 
http://baiyujia.com/vfpadvanced/f_vfpa_about.asp ?

Thanks!





[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/016801d5a1f2$a3e57860$ebb06920$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: So, about this VFPA thing...

2019-11-23 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
So do we just keep developing as we were but put the VFPA runtime files 
in place (and deploy them to client sites)?  No real change for our 
development?


On 11/22/2019 11:08 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:

Yes, that is the right site.

Happy Coding!
Tracy

On November 22, 2019 10:42:56 PM EST, Vince Teachout  wrote:

Apparently, I've been under a rock, and there's a magically enhanced
VFP9 SP2 that fixes some bugs, can run concurrently with vfp9, and
supports 64 bits.

Before I download something, am I on the right site:
http://baiyujia.com/vfpadvanced/f_vfpa_about.asp ?

Thanks!





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ce5a8b3d-d308-5d78-eeb7-1c92e4e1d...@caracal.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions
of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This
statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid
to see the obvious.

Report [OT] Abuse:
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/ce5a8b3d-d308-5d78-eeb7-1c92e4e1d...@caracal.net


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
   text/plain (text body -- kept)
   text/html
---


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ae9fc971-d862-462f-04dd-73c6867a2...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.