So do we just keep developing as we were but put the VFPA runtime files
in place (and deploy them to client sites)? No real change for our
development?
On 11/22/2019 11:08 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
Yes, that is the right site.
Happy Coding!
Tracy
On November 22, 2019 10:42:56 PM EST, Vince Teachout <[email protected]> wrote:
Apparently, I've been under a rock, and there's a magically enhanced
VFP9 SP2 that fixes some bugs, can run concurrently with vfp9, and
supports 64 bits.
Before I download something, am I on the right site:
http://baiyujia.com/vfpadvanced/f_vfpa_about.asp ?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance:
https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions
of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This
statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid
to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse:
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/[email protected]
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
