At 11:35 AM 12/21/2006 -0500, Hal Kaplan wrote:
...
Is it wiser to dwell in the hell you know or to transport yourself to one
of which you are ignorant and play the newbie role yet once again?
...
Indeed, this rule of thumb comes to mind. But to apply it, do so
completely. For example, whether
On 12/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, one could argue that, due to its very nature, Linux is by a far
margin the 'best known hell' as compared to MS Windows.
It's true... do you know what they've put deep inside Vista?
Neither does anyone else ;)
--
Ted Roche
Ted
= Subject: RE: [NF] Browser/Internet problem - Solved
=
= At 11:35 AM 12/21/2006 -0500, Hal Kaplan wrote:
= ...
= Is it wiser to dwell in the hell you know or to transport
= yourself to
= one of which you are ignorant and play the newbie role yet
= once again?
= ...
=
= Indeed, this rule
= Subject: Re: [NF] Browser/Internet problem - Solved
=
= On 12/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
= Also, one could argue that, due to its very nature, Linux
= is by a far
= margin the 'best known hell' as compared to MS Windows.
=
=
= It's true... do you know what
Hal Kaplan wrote:
You are absolutely correct, CC. What I wrote is applicable to virtually ANY
change, with the exception of underwear, and that would depend on whether you
are discussing style
You mean as in boxers vs briefs ? I am sure I read somewhere that a
strong positive
= Subject: Re: [NF] Browser/Internet problem - Solved
=
= Hal Kaplan wrote:
= You are absolutely correct, CC. What I wrote is
= applicable to virtually ANY change, with the exception of
= underwear, and that would depend on whether you are
= discussing style
=
= You mean as in boxers
=
= At the moment, most of my time is spent serving clients that
= only use MS Windows. They're getting fed up. Even the 'big'
= guys. In the meantime when I get some spare time I dabble in
= Linux and other open source software. A lot of my clients
= are already dropping MS Office and going
On 12/19/06, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. For monitoring your computer, MS cannot be trusted IMO.
Gee, Charlie, if you feel that you can trust them to monitor the
application space, how can you trust them to run the OS?
g,dr
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche Associates, LLC
At 08:37 AM 12/20/2006 -0500, Ted Roche wrote:
On 12/19/06, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. For monitoring your computer, MS cannot be trusted IMO.
Gee, Charlie, if you feel that you can trust them to monitor the
application space, how can you trust them to run the OS?
g,dr
Paul Newton wrote:
Richard Kaye wrote:
If you don't use a proxy server, then there shouldn't be anything there.
If there is, that could cause you problems.
Well I don't use a proxy server and there isn't anything there
Uninstalled Norton Internet Security 2006 (which came
On 12/19/06, Paul Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uninstalled Norton Internet Security 2006 (which came with the laptop).
Solved problem.
Well, you're certainly secure if you can't access the internet.
I am now using the Windows (XP) firewall and AVG. Is that all I need ?
Any
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:30:49 -0500, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Ad-aware is one product I can
think of, but I believe there are a lot more out there - many of the
free.
No reason not to use Windows Defender from Microsoft.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Charlie Coleman wrote:
I would advise not using the Windows firewall. Instead, use something like
ZoneAlarm. I believe it gives you much more function, control, and
monitoring capability than the Windows firewall (and lets face it, based on
past performance, MS can't really be trusted in
At 04:04 PM 12/19/2006 +, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:30:49 -0500, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Ad-aware is one product I can
think of, but I believe there are a lot more out there - many of the
free.
No reason not to use Windows Defender from Microsoft.
Is
14 matches
Mail list logo
