El 26/06/14 17:59, Adam Buckland escribió:
Well done to the USA.
Good luck in the next round and ignore all the bile that sad cow Anne Coulter
spews from her festering puss filled hatred ridden gob
Sorry I'd like to say what I really think about her but I have had to hold
back
El 26/06/14 17:59, Adam Buckland escribió:
Well done to the USA.
Good luck in the next round and ignore all the bile that sad cow Anne Coulter
spews from her festering puss filled hatred ridden gob
Sorry I'd like to say what I really think about her but I have had to hold
back
Yes no passion is there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4-bobBbZGc
From: ProFox [profox-boun...@leafe.com] on behalf of Adam Buckland
[adam.buckl...@eurohill.com]
Sent: 26 June 2014 21:59
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [WC] World Cup
Well done
Well done to the USA.
Good luck in the next round and ignore all the bile that sad cow Anne Coulter
spews from her festering puss filled hatred ridden gob
Sorry I'd like to say what I really think about her but I have had to hold
back and as a rugby fan I don't even like football
Ed Leafe wrote:
I believe hockey uses something similar to review potential
goal/no-goal calls: officials off the ice who review the play and communicate
their decision.
Seems to work good in hockey. You don't have reviews for penalties.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions,
The booth officials could be retired officials too old/injured to
run on the field, but who know the game inside and out. They
should be at least as experienced as the field officials whose
calls they may overturn. But by having the review done away from
the field, the decision could be
Ted Roche wrote:
And how about Venus and that outfit? Should that be allowed?
Shouldn't we just go back to requiring white tennies?
Hi Ted,
Never got over the seminary? I tell you I couldn't wait to get out of there!
She is wearing a brown body suit, but when it gets sweaty it is the same
On Jun 5, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
Here's another reminder. LOL.
http://www.eatliver.com/img/2009/3849.jpg
Love it!
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On 05/06/10 10:50, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
Here's another reminder. LOL.
http://www.eatliver.com/img/2009/3849.jpg
Love it!
LOL
That's exactly it!
___
Post Messages to:
So, on the umpire's call that robbed the perfect game, isn't it a case
of the immovable object and the irresistible force?
1. The umpire's call is final, period. Opening the slightest crack in
that, no matter how egregious the screw-up, means that we'll spend a
half hour every game with the
And how about Venus and that outfit? Should that be allowed?
Shouldn't we just go back to requiring white tennies?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
So, on the umpire's call that robbed the perfect game, isn't it a case
of the immovable object and the irresistible force?
I disagree that you can say that the call on the final out robbed the
pitcher of a perfect game. Were there any
Ed Leafe wrote:
No video review is allowed at all (this was a WC qualifier). IOW, if
none of the officials saw it, it didn't happen.
Thanks. I wondered about that. Futbol seems to be a more purist sport
for most fans, like baseball. Ted's right about why the instant replay
wouldn't
On Jun 5, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Ken Kixmoeller f/h wrote:
Thanks. I wondered about that. Futbol seems to be a more purist sport
for most fans, like baseball. Ted's right about why the instant replay
wouldn't work in baseball (or life). OTOH, American football's rise in
popularity was driven by
Take it [WC] folks, or we'll have no recourse but to start talking
about baseball umpires, perfect games, and the legendary Celtics vs.
LA rivalry that are _real_ sports.
g,dr...
(Go Boston!)
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
On Jun 4, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Ken Kixmoeller f/h wrote:
Well, I'll be filtering it myself due to Thierry Henry being a cheating
b*stard and ensuring we're not there.
Whatever the he|| that means I even googled it, and I still don't
understand.
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jun 4, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Ken Kixmoeller f/h wrote:
I still don't understand.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=henry+handball+ireland
OIC -- thanks. The Ireland part is what I was missing. Otherwise there
were 100s of Thierry Henry' links.
So they don't use instant replay in
On Jun 4, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Ken Kixmoeller f/h wrote:
So they don't use instant replay in WC competition? On the replays it
looked pretty blatant.
No video review is allowed at all (this was a WC qualifier). IOW, if
none of the officials saw it, it didn't happen.
Quoting
18 matches
Mail list logo