On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 18:00, Malcolm Greene wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> Are you just focused on collaboration or are you looking to build a
> sustainable knowledgebase?
>
> We looked at Chatter - its a cool tool - but went the route of a wiki because
> our goal was not only to collaborate, but to
On 2018-06-15 13:00, Malcolm Greene wrote:
Mike,
Are you just focused on collaboration or are you looking to build a
sustainable knowledgebase?
We looked at Chatter - its a cool tool - but went the route of a wiki
because our goal was not only to collaborate, but to build, as an
internal
Mike,
Are you just focused on collaboration or are you looking to build a sustainable
knowledgebase?
We looked at Chatter - its a cool tool - but went the route of a wiki because
our goal was not only to collaborate, but to build, as an internal community, a
shared knowledgebase of re-usable
On 2018-05-29 12:23, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
The Corporate gig has tasked me with looking into a way for several
similar organizations to communicate and share with each other things
are the related to the success of all of them; a collaborative sharing
of ideas, best
On 2018-05-29 12:39, Ed Leafe wrote:
On May 29, 2018, at 11:23 AM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
The Corporate gig has tasked me with looking into a way for several
similar organizations to communicate and share with each other things
are the related to the success of
Not a good option for this nationally shared information vehicle.
On 2018-06-02 05:38, Man-wai Chang wrote:
A simple IMAP server should do, one that supports shared mailboxes.
Basically, you can run a BBS or web-forum with it.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:23 AM,
wrote:
The Corporate gig has
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Fernando D. Bozzo wrote:
> I think that a CMS could be an option
ION, everything on the internet is a CMS ;)
Not to disagree with you, Fernando, but just to ask if you had a
specific product in mind.
A CMS primarily designed for chronological journal entries is
A simple IMAP server should do, one that supports shared mailboxes.
Basically, you can run a BBS or web-forum with it.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:23 AM,
wrote:
> The Corporate gig has tasked me with looking into a way for several similar
> organizations to communicate and share with each other
My goodness, there IS a product called SugarCRM!!
So which is it, Dave? :-)
On 2018-06-01 10:46, Eric Selje wrote:
Or maybe SugarCRM? Sugar is sweet.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:12 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
On 2018-05-30 11:05, Dave Crozier wrote:
Mike,
Or maybe SugarCRM? Sugar is sweet.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:12 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2018-05-30 11:05, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
>> Mike,
>> SweetCRM is a particularly good open source CRM that is constantly
>> evolving with loads of free "addins". Paid
On 2018-05-30 11:05, Dave Crozier wrote:
Mike,
SweetCRM is a particularly good open source CRM that is constantly
evolving with loads of free "addins". Paid version is cloud hosted but
the open source version you can host on either your own or an external
ISP's server
Dave
Dave Crozier
e
property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any
time
-Original Message-
From: ProFox On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: 30 May 2018 15:51
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Best Practices for collaborative sharing of informat
So many points have been made that cover a variety of this major request.
Can you describe in more detail what you want to achieve? What is the
mission statement or the executive view for this functionality? From that,
we might get you closer to a PRODUCT that scales in multiple directions.
Are
On 2018-05-30 01:20, Fernando D. Bozzo wrote:
I think that a CMS could be an option
Any you would recommend in particular?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
I think that a CMS could be an option
El mar., 29 may. 2018 18:22,
escribió:
> The Corporate gig has tasked me with looking into a way for several
> similar organizations to communicate and share with each other things
> are the related to the success of all of them; a collaborative sharing
>
And nothing in our current solution stack in Microsoft. Java shop
running JSP pages on Linux servers and Oracle database.
On 2018-05-29 17:47, Eric Selje wrote:
Justified.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Eric Selje
wrote:
> As many of
On 2018-05-29 13:18, Ed Leafe wrote:
On May 29, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
Another +1 for Slack.
Slack works well for synchronous communication, not as well for async,
and is worthless as a document store.
This need is for information sharing on a permanent level, with thread
Justified.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Eric Selje wrote:
> > As many of you know from my SW Fox session. I'm an advocate of OneNote.
>
> And if you don't, you can read it here:
>
>
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Eric Selje wrote:
> As many of you know from my SW Fox session. I'm an advocate of OneNote.
And if you don't, you can read it here:
http://saltydogllc.com/wp-content/uploads/OneNote-to-Rule-Them-All.pdf
> If
> you have a SharePoint site you can share it on
As many of you know from my SW Fox session. I'm an advocate of OneNote. If
you have a SharePoint site you can share it on it's amazing as a
collaboration tool.
Eric
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
> I'm with Ted - wikis are great for this type of thing. We're using a
>
I'm with Ted - wikis are great for this type of thing. We're using a hosted
version of Atlassian Confluence. No fuss - no muss. Works well. Recommended.
Malcolm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Wiki.
You need to have a Wikimaster and/or volunteers/power-users who can
step in and refactor things, clean up threaded discussions into
outlines, etc.
Best practices become static, organized documents, easy to index and
cross-reference.
Many support file upload/download for a shared
We use Google Drive for the necessary file sharing.
Fred
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 29, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
> >
> > Another +1 for Slack.
>
> Slack works well for synchronous communication, not as well for async, and
> is worthless as a
On May 29, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
>
> Another +1 for Slack.
Slack works well for synchronous communication, not as well for async, and is
worthless as a document store.
-- Ed Leafe
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
text/plain (text body
Another +1 for Slack.
Fred
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Stephen Russell
wrote:
> Ed beat me to Slack. We use it with the KofC to keep small groups working
> on a project together in touch with one another. None of us work together
> but we can all hook up as needed to share via Slack.
Ed beat me to Slack. We use it with the KofC to keep small groups working
on a project together in touch with one another. None of us work together
but we can all hook up as needed to share via Slack.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:23 AM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> The
On 2018-05-29 12:39, Ed Leafe wrote:
On May 29, 2018, at 11:23 AM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
The Corporate gig has tasked me with looking into a way for several
similar organizations to communicate and share with each other things
are the related to the success of
On May 29, 2018, at 11:23 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
> The Corporate gig has tasked me with looking into a way for several similar
> organizations to communicate and share with each other things are the related
> to the success of all of them; a collaborative
28 matches
Mail list logo
