RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Rick Schummer
It works perfectly. I like to use the Anchor property editor/builder too. It is really useful with common settings and the always helpful try it out here feature. Cool example what you can do with property editors. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Profox
...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred Taylor Sent: 13 March 2009 02:07 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field) That's what the .Anchor property is for. A value of 5 (top and bottom absolute) might be what you need. Fred On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:03

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Grigore Dolghin
Kevin, I 100% agree with you here. When user maximizes Excel he expects to see more columns, not same number of columns. If the user wants to widen a column, he has means to do it. In both Excel and VFP. (Side note: same rationale applies to why the programmer should NEVER increase/decrease the

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Richard Kaye
The help file spells that out pretty clearly. Of course, I scratched my head for a while until I noticed this. The anchor uses the location when the object is created. If you want to base anchoring on the control's current position after it is has been moved, reset the control's Anchor

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Tracy Pearson
I've resorted to putting some controls inside a container and setting the container to grow relatively. The objects in the container are set absolute. This keeps labels and buttons tight with the grid that resizes. Tracy -Original Message- From: Richard Kaye Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Richard Kaye
[mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 9:43 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field) I've resorted to putting some controls inside a container and setting the container to grow relatively

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
Rick Schummer wrote: It works perfectly. I like to use the Anchor property editor/builder too. It is really useful with common settings and the always helpful try it out here feature. Cool example what you can do with property editors. Agreed. That was a very nice touch on that feature!

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
Grigore Dolghin wrote: (Side note: same rationale applies to why the programmer should NEVER increase/decrease the font size during resize). I agree. (Some devs actually do that? Say it ain't so!) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Rick Schummer
(Side note: same rationale applies to why the programmer should NEVER increase/decrease the font size during resize). While I agree that the zoom/resize feature is annoying, I have customers who are visually handicap and they love the zoom feature. Another one of those personal preferences.

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread Paul McNett
Rick Schummer wrote: (Side note: same rationale applies to why the programmer should NEVER increase/decrease the font size during resize). While I agree that the zoom/resize feature is annoying, I have customers who are visually handicap and they love the zoom feature. Another one of those

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-13 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
On Fri, March 13, 2009 12:11 pm, Paul McNett wrote: I think that both are valid but separate concepts: + controls should resize to the size of the form, but *not* change font size. + there should be separate Zoom In/Zoom Out/Zoom Normal functions that change the font size and control size,

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
So I'm just missing the code in the grid.Resize? Do you bind that to the form resize with BINDEVENTS? That's exactly what I wanted it for---to drop the grid with the bottom when the user resizes. Tracy Pearson wrote: It's not totally useless for grids. You do need to add code in the resize

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread Tracy Pearson
No need to bind anything. Put code to call a method in the resize event of the grid. In the method handle the column resizing. When the grid's anchor property is set to allow horizontal growth, changing the width of the parent container fires the resize event which calls your method. Tracy

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread Kevin Cully
I've been just calling the grid.AutoFit() method to optimize the grid columns, assuming that there isn't a huge text field being displayed. Would there be other downsides to calling that method? -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Tracy Pearson wrote: No need to bind anything. Put code to call a

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread Tracy Pearson
I've not used it extensively. Depending on the data, you might have 5 rows showing with short information, then when the user scrolls down the information is cut off. It is the user experience that keeps me from using it. Spreadsheet programs have that feature, and when I've used it, I've not

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread Allen Pollard
, March 12, 2009 3:26 PM Subject: Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field) I've been just calling the grid.AutoFit() method to optimize the grid columns, assuming that there isn't a huge text field being displayed. Would there be other downsides to calling that method

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
Kevin Cully wrote: I've been just calling the grid.AutoFit() method to optimize the grid columns, assuming that there isn't a huge text field being displayed. Would there be other downsides to calling that method? I too always just used AutoSize for the horizontal display. What I'm looking

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread Fred Taylor
That's what the .Anchor property is for. A value of 5 (top and bottom absolute) might be what you need. Fred On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:03 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Kevin Cully wrote: I've been just calling the

Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-12 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
Fred Taylor wrote: That's what the .Anchor property is for. A value of 5 (top and bottom absolute) might be what you need. Well I'll be darned.for whatever reason, I must have done something different last time. It works perfectly. I've thrown together a quick grid sample form and sent

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-11 Thread Richard Kaye
enhancements to TEXT...ENDTEXT anchors mo' better convergence of ANSI SQL with VFP SQL intellisense in watch window Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 On Wed, March 11, 2009 11:50 am, Vince Teachout wrote: John Weller wrote: It's

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-11 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
On Wed, March 11, 2009 3:18 pm, Richard Kaye wrote: enhancements to TEXT...ENDTEXT anchors mo' better convergence of ANSI SQL with VFP SQL intellisense in watch window The anchors feature sounds very cool, but I must admit that I've not yet tapped into that. You have, obviously? How many

RE: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

2009-03-11 Thread Tracy Pearson
It's not totally useless for grids. You do need to add code in the resize event of a grid to account for the width changes. Each grid will be unique, but can be generic with a property holding the resizable columns. Vertical changes are a big plus to the user. -Original Message- From: MB