Correction:
3 (4 : 'y{~<< -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] Namens R.E. Boss
> Verzonden: woensdag 12 september 2012 8:34
> Aan: programm...@jsoftware.com
> Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] Removin
3 (4 : '({.y) (] {~ [:<^:3 i.~)^:x y') 1 1 2 3 1 9 10 8 1
2 3 9 10 8 1
3 (4 : 'y{~<<<3{.I.(={.)y') 1 1 2 3 1 9 10 8 1
2 3 9 10 8 1
R.E. Boss
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] Namens Rog
If it's a general approach and (more importantly :-) it solves your
problem, then take the general solution and simplify it for your specific
problem.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:49 PM, June Kim (김창준) wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> Thanks, Roger, as always. I am aware of that wiki page, but I think it'
Hi Roger,
Thanks, Roger, as always. I am aware of that wiki page, but I think it's a
more general approach. How could I use that to make removen simpler and
more elegant?
Best regards
June
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Roger Hui wrote:
> You may want to look at
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jw
Hi All,
Unfortunately, I was unable to get the video conference setup in time for
tonight's NYCJUG meeting.
Hopefully this will be rectified for the December meeting that we will host.
Sorry for the late notice.
Ken
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Devon McCormick wrote:
> NYCJUG will meet a
Several kinds of issues intersect here.
One issue is of course the existing implementations of J. As we have
seen, the implementation for imposing rank on a verb involves
sequential processing.
One issue is machine architecture. Historically, J has been
implemented on a CPU architecture -- it's d
You were right
It was my misunderstanding.. Done!
Raul Miller-4 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, pascha wrote:
>> Thanks.. "row_number" works
>> But now the problem is I want the verb to iterate over one array at a
>> time.
>> for example if I do proccess"0(1+i.2) the resultant inp
An interesting and potentially useful ambiguity here is that
process"0 (1+i.2)
conceptually (as I understand it) processes the two arguments
simultaneously but actually processes them serially as it is written
in Raul's example. One reason this is interesting is that you could
write "process"
Hi Pascha,
If you haven't looked at Henry Rich's 'J for C Programmers', specifically
Chapter 5 http://www.jsoftware.com/help/jforc/declarations.htm#_Toc191734319
and Chapter 6
http://www.jsoftware.com/help/jforc/loopless_code_i_verbs_have_r.htm#_Toc191734331
I think that is an excellent start
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, pascha wrote:
> Thanks.. "row_number" works
> But now the problem is I want the verb to iterate over one array at a time.
> for example if I do proccess"0(1+i.2) the resultant input is:
>
> /home/user/input/filename1.pgm
> /home/user/input/filename2.pgm
Not exact
Thanks. It uses a constact in android 3.0 so that it failed in older
android. A new apk has been uploaded, please test again and attach
logcat to me if it failed again.
Втр, 11 Сен 2012, Konrad Hinsen писал(а):
> bill lam writes:
>
> > There should be another set of messages for "JJNI" which po
Thanks.. "row_number" works
But now the problem is I want the verb to iterate over one array at a time.
for example if I do proccess"0(1+i.2) the resultant input is:
/home/user/input/filename1.pgm
/home/user/input/filename2.pgm
what I want is to "separately" process each array. In the first iter
bill lam writes:
> There should be another set of messages for "JJNI" which polt used.
There's tons of JJNI stuff but it doesn't seem related. I'll send you
the full log by private mail.
Konrad.
--
For information about J forum
There should be another set of messages for "JJNI" which polt used.
Втр, 11 Сен 2012, Konrad Hinsen писал(а):
> bill lam writes:
>
> > There might be some debug mesages in logcat showing how plot demo
> > failed. Search with keyword "logcat" in google play.
>
> Here's the log, filtered by "j-i
bill lam writes:
> There might be some debug mesages in logcat showing how plot demo
> failed. Search with keyword "logcat" in google play.
Here's the log, filtered by "j-interface". There's an error message
but I don't understand what it means.
Konrad.
D/j-interface(11752): init called
I/j-i
Right, the main problem for me is I've troubles to understand iteration of
verbs over array dimension
any suggestion for tutorial?
aks_sba wrote:
>
> Pascha,
>
> The people who have been responding are trying to help you understand the
> "j way" to get your problem addressed. In other words, t
armv6 should not run at all. It might be an armv7 with vfp-lite.
Втр, 11 Сен 2012, bill lam писал(а):
> I guess galaxy s might use armv6 with vfp-lite which is only marginally
> faster than software emulation.
>
> There might be some debug mesages in logcat showing how plot demo
> failed. Search
I guess galaxy s might use armv6 with vfp-lite which is only marginally
faster than software emulation.
There might be some debug mesages in logcat showing how plot demo
failed. Search with keyword "logcat" in google play.
Втр, 11 Сен 2012, Konrad Hinsen писал(а):
> bill lam writes:
>
> > insta
If the grand total verb is likely to need different definitions for
different contexts, I think it makes even more sense to define it
separately from the subtotal verb.
--
Raul
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Robert Cyr wrote:
> Thank you Raul.
>
> As for gt, there are often multiple levels o
If I understand what you wrote, you want something like this:
require'files'
process=: 3 :0
row_number=. ":y
input=: fread '/home/user/input/filename', row_number ,'.pgm'
NB. insert here, some calculations which define output as a sequence
of characters
assert. 1=#$output
assert. ' ' =
Thank you Raul.
As for gt, there are often multiple levels of sub-totals, requiring a
loop, , or perhaps a recusrsive form.
Your point on reserved words is well taken.
Robert
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
>gt=: ([#_:), +/@:(}."1)
>M=: mt,gt
>
> --
> Raul
>
> P.S
Me too.
I originally had doublequotes around "beginner", but decided
"self-identified" made the point well enough.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Roger Hui wrote:
>> For a self-identified beginner -- that's quite smart.
>
> I suspect this "beginner" has multiple advanced degrees in math, comp.
bill lam writes:
> installation: must first un-uninstall any previous android j.
>
> speed test:
> timex '%. 500 500 ?@$ 1000'
I just tested this on a Samsung Galaxy S. No problems, but not much of a speedup
either:
1.0.5 (3 runs):
15.265 15.1584 14.9573
The test version (3 runs):
14.2
> For a self-identified beginner -- that's quite smart.
I suspect this "beginner" has multiple advanced degrees in math, comp.
sci., etc.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Ian Clark wrote:
> For a self-identified beginner -- that's quite smart.
>
> (;"_1) indeed! You've been reading the J Dict
24 matches
Mail list logo
