For another thing, there are special rules about how the u and v are stacked in
the context of an explicit operator. There is a big difference between - 1 :
('u=.+';' u`'''' ') and - 1 : ('f=.+';' f`'''' ')
-Dan
---
;
> 2 ^^:([`('"' atomic_rep)`]) 0 1 2
> 2 4 16
>
> So I'd prefer to agree that gerund means "array of atomic representations".
>
> -Dan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
> [mailto:progra
e attempted to capture the meaning of
>> "gerund"
>>
>> Sidebar in NuVoc definition of ` :
>> http://jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/backtick#sidebar.3Agerunds
>>
>> As a necessary premise in the definition of a modifier utility:
>> www.jsoftware.com/jwiki
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Verb display in function tables
>>>>
>>>> Ok...
>>>>
>>>> ...except that gerunds are defined as vectors.
>>>>
>>>> Conceptually speaking, if it's a scalar, or a matrix, it's something
>&g
livers exactly
>>> what was asked for is rarely the hero of folklore.
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>> PS: If we wish to continue the digression, it might be better to start
>>> with the links below, better starting point would be wh
>>>
>>
ide-effect of the method used to remove the trailing atom
>>> (select-all-but-last as opposed to select-first).
>>>
>>> The proposed scalar should be a transparent replacement for the original
>>> vector, whose shape wasn't serving a specific purpose (no
DOOG#definition
>
> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Raul Miller
> Sender: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:52:13
> To: Programming forum
> Reply-To: Programming forum
> Subject:
n
Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
-Original Message-
From: Henry Rich
Sender: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:19:45
To: Programming forum
Reply-To: Programming forum
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Verb display in function tables
I think Dan has it
.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/backtick#sidebar.3Agerunds
>
> As a necessary premise in the definition of a modifier utility:
> www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DanBron/Snippets/DOOG#definition
>
> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Raul Miller
sary premise in the definition of a modifier utility:
www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DanBron/Snippets/DOOG#definition
Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
-Original Message-
From: Raul Miller
Sender: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:52:13
To: Programming fo
uperfluous,
> but often pernicious).
>
> -Dan
>
>
> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Raul Miller
> Sender: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:41:56
> To: Programming forum
> Repl
rogramming-boun...@jsoftware.com
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:41:56
To: Programming forum
Reply-To: Programming forum
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Verb display in function tables
I often do that myself, but in this case, the original phrase was also
generating a 1 element vector, so I decided that a
I often do that myself, but in this case, the original phrase was also
generating a 1 element vector, so I decided that a 1-element vector
was an appropriate result.
--
Raul
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Dan Bron wrote:
> Because in many contexts, a scalar is more convenient than a 1-element
Because in many contexts, a scalar is more convenient than a 1-element vector,
I make a habit of tacking on a {. as in {.u`'' .
-Dan
On Feb 18, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> I would use u`''
>
> avg 1 :'u`'
> +---+
> |avg|
> +---+
> avg
> |value error: avg
>
> --
> R
I would use u`''
avg 1 :'u`'
+---+
|avg|
+---+
avg
|value error: avg
--
Raul
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Edward Mokurai Cherlin
wrote:
> I had thought that I would not be able to get a program to show the
> definition of a function given its name, but I found a kludge for the
>
Edward,
Are you using J in your OLPC project?
Skip
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Edward Mokurai Cherlin <
moku...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> I had thought that I would not be able to get a program to show the
> definition of a function given its name, but I found a kludge for the
> purpose usi
Here is verb table from the z locale. Does it help?
table
1 : (':'; '(((#~LF-.@e.])5!:5<''u'');,.y),.({.;}.)":x,y u/x')~
+table i.5
┌─┬─┐
│+│0 1 2 3 4│
├─┼─┤
│0│0 1 2 3 4│
│1│1 2 3 4 5│
│2│2 3 4 5 6│
│3│3 4 5 6 7│
│4│4 5 6 7 8│
└─┴─┘
On 2/17
show =: 1 : '5!:5<''u'''
should serve your purposes. Execute as an adverb, i.e.
(+/%#) show
+/ % #
There are other formats, which you can find in the help section on foreigns
under 5!: .
Marshall
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Edward Mokurai Cherlin <
moku...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> I had
I had thought that I would not be able to get a program to show the
definition of a function given its name, but I found a kludge for the
purpose using tie. Now I would like to know whether somebody has a
direct solution. My application for this capability is a defined
adverb for producing function
19 matches
Mail list logo
