On 08/09/11 10:41, Rob Arthan wrote:
On 6 Sep 2011, at 15:19, Phil Clayton wrote:
I would have a similar issue the other way around. Is it possible
for the width of the editor window to be the same whether or not Xpp
is started with a journal window?
That is exactly the old behaviour which is
Phil,
On 6 Sep 2011, at 15:19, Phil Clayton wrote:
>>> I would have a similar issue the other way around. Is it possible for the
>>> width of the editor window to be the same whether or not Xpp is started
>>> with a journal window?
>>
>> That is exactly the old behaviour which is bad for peo
Rob,
On 04/09/11 11:49, Rob Arthan wrote:
Phil,
On 3 Sep 2011, at 20:01, Phil Clayton wrote:
Rob,
Thanks for the latest release. I have been using this for a while now and have
a few comments.
On 14/08/11 16:18, Rob Arthan wrote:
a) For visual compatibility with the ISO standard, a sym
Phil,
On 3 Sep 2011, at 20:01, Phil Clayton wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Thanks for the latest release. I have been using this for a while now and
> have a few comments.
>
>
> On 14/08/11 16:18, Rob Arthan wrote:
>> a) For visual compatibility with the ISO standard, a symbol for unary
>> minus in Z ha
Rob,
Thanks for the latest release. I have been using this for a while now
and have a few comments.
On 14/08/11 16:18, Rob Arthan wrote:
a) For visual compatibility with the ISO standard, a symbol for unary
minus in Z has been added to the font and defined as a synonym of the
unary minus wr
Oops1
On 14 Aug 2011, at 16:18, Rob Arthan wrote:
> ...
> b) In xpp, you can now switch dynamically between the horizontal and vertical
> layout using a new item in the window geometry.
I meant "new item in the Window Menu".
Regards,
Rob.___
Proofpo
